Bar-TalD. (2013). Intractable conflicts: Socio-psychological foundations and dynamics. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139025195
3.
BerardiF. ‘Bifo’. (2009). The soul at work: From alienation to autonomy. Semiotext.
4.
BignallS., & PattonP. (2010). Deleuze and the postcolonial. Illustrated ed. Edinburgh University Press.
5.
BohrerA. J. (2019). Marxism and intersectionality: Race, gender, class and sexuality under contemporary capitalism. 1st ed. Transcript Verlag.
6.
BoutangY. M. (2012). Cognitive capitalism. 1st ed. Polity.
7.
BuchananI. (2020). Assemblage theory and method: An introduction and guide. Bloomsbury Academic.
8.
BüscherM., UrryJ., & WitchgerK. (2010). Mobile methods. Taylor & Francis.
9.
ChowR. (2010). Postcolonial visibilities: Questions inspired by Deleuze’s method. In BignallS. & PattonP. (Eds.), Deleuze and the Postcolonial (pp. 62–77). Edinburgh University Press.
10.
DattaA. (Ed.). (2020). The problem. Victimhood: A symposium of its politics in our times [Seminar 727]. https://www.india-seminar.com/2020/727/727_the_problem.htm
11.
DeanJ. (1996). Solidarity of strangers: Feminism after identity politics. University of California Press.
12.
DeanJ. (2009). Democracy and other neoliberal fantasies: Communicative capitalism and left politics. Duke University Press.
13.
DeleuzeG. (1994). Difference and repetition. Athlone Press.
14.
EagletonT. (2016). Materialism. Reprint ed. Yale University Press.
15.
EderJ., HartmannB., & TedjasukmanaC. (2020). Bewegungsbilder: Politische videos in Sozialen Medien[Moving Images: Political Videos in Social Media]. Bertz und Fischer.
16.
FatimaI. (2015). Khoon Diy Baarav [Blood Leaves Its Trail].
17.
FielitzM., & MarcksH. (2020). Digitaler Faschismus: die sozialen Medien als Motor des Rechtsextremismus[Digital Fascism: Social Media as an Engine of Right Extremism]. Dudenverlag.
18.
FraserN. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 25/26, 56–80. 10.2307/466240
19.
GhoshP. (2016). The deed of words: Two considerations on politics of literature. Aakar Books.
20.
GhoshP. (2022). Insurgent metaphors: Essays on culture and class. Routledge.
21.
GhoshS. (2010). Fire: A queer film classic. Arsenal Pulp Press.
22.
HabermasJ. (1990). Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit: Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft [Structural Change in the Public Sphere] (1st ed.). Suhrkamp Verlag.
23.
HaiderA. (2018). Mistaken identity: Race and class in the age of Trump. Verso.
24.
JamesW. (2000). Pragmatics and other writings. Penguin.
25.
KishoreS. (2018). Indian documentary film and filmmakers: Practicing independence. Edinburgh University Press.
26.
KramerM. (2017). Mobilizing conflict testimony: A lens of mobility for the study of documentary practices in the Kashmir conflict. Social Sciences, 6(3), 88. 10.3390/socsci6030088
27.
KramerM. (2022). A bird at my window: Communicative community and contextual visibility. In TitzmannFritzi-Marie & SchneiderNadja-Christina (Eds.). Conference publication: How to live together? circulatory practices and contested spaces in India. RePLITO.
28.
LakoffG., & JohnsonM. (2003). Metaphors we live by: With a new afterword. Revised ed. University of Chicago Press.
29.
LiangL. (2003). Conceptualizing law and culture [Seminar, 525]. https://www.india-seminar.com/2003/525/525%20lawrence%20liang.htm
30.
MarksL. U. (2000). The skin of the film: Intercultural cinema, embodiment, and the senses. Illustrated ed. Duke University Press.
31.
MassumiB. (1995). The autonomy of affect. Cultural Critique, 31(31), 83–109.
32.
MazzarellaW. (2009). Affect: What is it good for? In DubeSaurabh (Ed.). Enchantments of modernity (pp. 309–327). Routledge India. 10.4324/9780203150993-19
33.
MazzarellaW. (2013). Censorium: Cinema and the open edge of mass publicity. Duke University Press.
NegtO., & KlugeA. (1972). Öffentlichkeit und Erfahrung. Zur Organisations analyse von bürgerlicher und proletarischer Öffentlichkeit [Structural Change in the Public Sphere] (2nd ed.). Suhrkamp.
36.
RobinsK. (2004). Beyond imagined community? InIdentitätsräume: Nation Körper und Geschlecht in den Medien (pp. 114–132). Transcript.
37.
SchatzkiT. R., & CetinaK. K. (2000). The practice turn in contemporary theory. Routledge.
38.
SchneiderN.-C. (2015). Applying the lens of mobility to media and gender studies: An introduction. InNew media configurations and socio-cultural dynamics in Asia and the Arab World (pp. 225–242). Nomos.
39.
ShellerM., & UrryJ. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 38(2), 207–226. 10.1068/a37268
40.
StengersI. (2017). Another science is possible: A manifesto for slow science. S. Muecke (Transl.). 1st ed. Polity.
41.
SundaramR. (2020). Hindu nationalism’s crisis machine. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 10(3), 734–741. 10.1086/712222
42.
TáíwòO. O. (2022). Elite capture: How the powerful took over identity politics. Pluto Press.
UdupaS. (2016). Archiving as history-making: Religious politics of social media in India. Communication, Culture & Critique, 9(2), 212–230. 10.1111/cccr.12114
45.
UrryJ. (1999). Sociology beyond societies: Mobilities for the twenty-first century. Subsequent ed. Taylor & Francis Ltd.
46.
WarnerM. (2005). Publics and counterpublics. Zone Books.