AhmedS., & JaidkaK. (2013). Protests against #delhigangrape on Twitter: Analyzing India’s Arab spring. eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 5(1), 28–58.
BonillaY., & RosaJ. (2015). #Ferguson: Digital protest, hashtag ethnography, and the racial politics of social media in the United States. American Ethnologist, 42(1), 4–17.
6.
BottaF., MoatH. S., & PreisT. (2015). Quantifying crowd size with mobile phone and Twitter data. Royal Society Open Science, 2(5), 150162.
7.
GohdesA. (2015). Pulling the plug: Network disruptions and violence in civil conflict. Journal of Peace Research, 52(3), 352–367.
8.
GohdesA. (2018). Studying the Internet and violent conflict. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 35(1), 89–106.
9.
Hootsuite & We Are Social (2020). Digital 2020: India. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2020-india
10.
JainA., & RadhikaJ. (2019). Status of policing in India report 2019. Common Cause and Centre for the Study of Developing Societies.
11.
LarsonJ., NaglerJ., RonenJ., & TuckerJ. (2019). Social networks and protest participation: Evidence from 130 million Twitter users. American Journal of Political Science, 63(3), 690–705.
12.
MameiM., & ColonnaM. (2016). Estimating attendance from cellular network data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 30(7), 1281–1301.
13.
McPhailC., & McCarthyJ. (2004). Who counts and how: Estimating the size of protests. Contexts, 3(3), 12–18.
14.
MellonJ., & ProsserC. (2017). Twitter and Facebook are not representative of the general population: Political attitudes and demographics of social media users. Research & Politics, 4(3), 1–9.
15.
OlzakS. (1989). Analysis of events in the study of collective action. Annual Review of Sociology, 15, 119–141.
16.
SchweingruberD., & McPhailC. (1999). A method for systematically observing and recording collective action. Sociological Methods & Research, 27(4), 451–498.
17.
SobolevA., ChenK., JooJ., & Steinert-ThrelkeldZ. (2020). News and geolocated social media accurately measure protest size variation. American Political Science Review, 114(4), 1343–1351.
18.
Steinert-ThrelkeldZ. (2019). The future of event data is images. Sociological Methodology, 49(1), 68–75.
19.
VarshneyA. (2019). Modi consolidates power: Electoral vibrancy, mounting liberal deficits. Journal of Democracy, 30(4), 63–77.
20.
VarshneyA., & WilkinsonS. (1996). Hindu-Muslim riots 1960–93: New findings, possible remedies. Rajiv Gandhi Institute for Contemporary Studies.
21.
WilliamsM., BurnapP., & SloanL. (2017). Towards and ethical framework for publishing Twitter data: Taking into account users’ views, online context, and algorithmic estimation. Sociology, 51(6), 1149–1168.
22.
ZeitzoffT. (2017). How social media is changing conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 61(9), 1970–1991.
23.
ZhangH., & PanJ. (2019). Casm: A deep-learning approach for identifying collective action events with text and image data from social media. Sociological Methodology, 49(1), 1–57.
24.
ZhongZ., WangT., & HuangM. (2017). Does the Great Fire Wall cause self-censorship? The effects of perceived internet regulation and the justification of regulation. Internet Research, 27(4), 974–990.