There is an existing debate on the epistemic hegemony of the knowledge system of industrial agriculture. The two sides posit a critique and offer alternatives from already existing practices of agriculture. Most often, the critique is on hard material grounds, while the alternatives are offered in terms of the recovery of a cultural set of practices. This article posits a fresh critique to complement the existing one and expands the scope of the alternative to make critical appraisals of existing knowledge systems. For the first, it critically analyses each of the presumptions that underlie the argument of the dominant vision and for the second, this article identifies, analyses and aims to foreground those perspectives that contested major policy decisions and the reasons for their subsequent marginalization. The issue of seed sovereignty—that of women farmers specially, retaining the authority to breed and propagate seeds for farming—is the focal point of this study.
AgrawalA. (1995). Dismantling the divide between indigenous and scientific knowledge. Development and Change, 26(3), 413–439.
2.
AgrawalA. (2009). Why ‘indigenous’ knowledge?Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 39(4), 157–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014220909510569
3.
BaruniT. (1990). Development and politics of knowledge: A critical interpretation of the social role of modernisation theories in the development of the third world. In MarglinA. F. & MarglinS. A. (Eds.), Dominating knowledge: Development, culture and resistance. Clarendon Press.
4.
BrownT. (2018). Farmers, subalterns, and activists: Social politics of sustainable agriculture in India. Cambridge University Press.
5.
DograB. (2016, October16). As Bayer and Monsanto merge, watch out for what happens to our food and farmers. The Wire. https://thewire.in/agriculture/bayer-monsato-deal-impact-concentration-seeds-agri-chemicals-industries-farmers
6.
DuttR. P. (1940). India today. Victor Gollancz.
7.
ElkanaY. (1981). A programmatic attempt at an anthropology of knowledge. In EverettM. & YehudaE. (Eds.), Sciences and cultures: Anthropological and historical studies of the sciences. Springer.
8.
EscobarA. (1995). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the third world. Princeton University Press.
9.
FAO (1989). The state of food and agriculture, 1989, food and agriculture organisation of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/3/t0162e/t0162e.pdf
10.
FitzgeraldD., (2003). Every farm a factory: The industrial ideal in American agriculture. Yale University Press.
11.
GOI. (n.d.). State of Indian agriculture 2012–13. https://agritech.tnau.ac.in/ta/pdf/2013/State%20of%20Indian%20Agriculture%202012-13%20(English)%20with%20cover.pdf
12.
GroveR. H., (1995). Green imperialism: Colonial expansion, tropical Island Edens and the origins of environmentalism, 1600–1860. Cambridge University Press.
13.
IlesA., LovelaceG. G., MontenegroM., & GaltR. (2017). Agricultural systems: Co-producing knowledge and food. In FeltU., FouchéR., MillerC. A., & Smith-DoerrL. (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies (4th ed). MIT Press.
14.
KloppenbergJ. (1988). First the seed: The political economy of plant biotechnology: 1492–2000. Cambridge University Press.
15.
KumarR. (2019). India’s Green Revolution and beyond: Visioning agrarian futures on selective readings of agrarian pasts. Economic and Political Weekly, 54(34), 41–48.
16.
MarglinA. F., & MarglinS. A. (Eds.). (1990). Dominating knowledge: Development, culture and resistance. Clarendon Press.
17.
NandyA. (1987). Traditions, tyranny and utopias: Essays in politics of awareness. Oxford University Press.
18.
NewellP. (2003). Globalisation and the governance of biotechnology. Global Environmental Politics, 3(2), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.1162/152638003322068218
19.
PaceyA. (1983). The culture of technology. The MIT Press Cambridge.
20.
PeschardK. (2015). Farmers’ right and food sovereignty: Critical insights from India. In EdelmanM., ScottJ. C., BaviskarA., Borras JrS. M., KandiyotiD., Holt-GimenezE., WeisT., & WolfordW. (Eds.), Critical perspective of food sovereignty: Global agrarian transformations (Vol. 2). Routledge.
21.
PionettiC. (2006). Sowing autonomy: Gender and seed politics in semi-arid India. IIED.
22.
Rabobank (2006). Indian seed industry: Market overview and outlook. Industry Note 184-2006. Rabobank, Utrecht.
23.
RainaR. S. (1997). Public patronage and political neutrality in agricultural research: Lessons from British experience. The Economic and Political Weekly, 32(39), 2473–2485.
24.
RainaR., JosephK., HaribabuE., & KumarR. (2009). Agricultural innovation systems and the coevolution of exclusion in India [Working Paper SIID 07/2009]. Systems of Innovation for Inclusive Development Project.
25.
RamaswamiB., SelharM., & MurugkarM. (2007). Competition and monopoly in Indian cotton seed market. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(37), 3781–3789.
26.
RanderiaS. (2007). De-politicization of democracy and judicialization of politics. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(4), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407080398
27.
RichhariaR. H. (1977). A strategy for rice production to ensure sustained growth in Madhya Pradesh. M. P. Rice Research Institute. https://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/displaybitstream?handle=1/64440
28.
SahaiS. (2003). India’s Plant Variety Protection and Farmer’s Rights Act, 2001. Current Science, 83(3). http://www.ask-force.org/web/India/Sahai-Indias-Plant-Variety-2003.pdf
29.
SchreinemachersP., RaoK. P. C., EasdownW., HensonP., & KumarS. (2017). The contribution of international vegetable breeding to private seed companies in India. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 64, 1037–1049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-016-0423-y
30.
SeshiaS. (2002). Plant variety protection and farmers’ rights: Law-making and cultivation of varietal control. Economic and Political Weekly, 37(27), 2741–2747.
31.
ShivaV. (2019). The Seed Bill 2019 is a threat to India’s seed sovereignty and farmer’s rights. Jivad. https://www.navdanya.org/bija-refelections/2019/11/04/the-the-seed-bill-2019-is-a-threat-to-indias-seed-sovereignty-and-farmers-rights/
32.
SpielmanD. J., KoladyD. E.. (2014). The seed and agricultural biotechnology industries in India: An analysis of industry structure, competition, and policy options. Food Policy, 45, 88–100. https://csisa.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2013/10/Spielman-et-al-Seed-and-biotech-industry-in-India-FP-14.pdf
33.
VisvanathanS. (1997). A carnival for science: Essays on science, technology, and development. Oxford University Press.
34.
VoelckerA. J. (1893). Report on improvement of Indian agriculture. Eyre and Spottiswoode. https://archive.org/details/cu319240010393249
35.
WalkerA. (1820). Indian agriculture. [Reprinted in Dharampal. (1971). Indian Science and Technology in the Eighteenth Century: Some Contemporary European Accounts. Biblia Impex.].
36.
WeilerH. N. (2009). Whose knowledge matters? Development and the politics of knowledge. In HanfT., WeilerH. N., & DickowH. (Eds.), Festschrift for Peter Molt. Baden-Baden.
37.
WhitcombeE. (1972). Agrarian conditions in Northern India: The United provinces under British rule, 1860–1900 (Vol. 1). University of California Press.
38.
YapaL. (1993). What is improved seed? An epistemology of the green revolution. Economic Geography, 69(3), 254–273.
