From Fieldsite to ‘Fieldsite’: Ethnographic Methods in the Time of COVID

Basu P. , & De Jong F. (2016). Utopian archives, decolonial affordances Introduction to special issue. Social Anthropology, 24(1), 5–19.

Blasco P. G. Y. (2012). ‘A wondrous adventure’: Mutuality and individuality in Internet adoption narratives. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 18(2), 330–348.

Bonilla Y. , & Rosa J. (2015). # Ferguson: Digital protest, hashtag ethnography, and the racial politics of social media in the United States. American Ethnologist, 42(1), 4–17.

Chambers T. (2020a). ‘Lean on me’: Sifarish, mediation & the digitisation of state bureaucracies in India. Ethnography, https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138120940755

Chambers T. (2020b). Networks, labour and migration among Indian Muslims artisans. UCL Press.

Dirks N. B. (2001). Castes of mind: Colonialism and the making of modern India. Princeton University Press.

Gupta A. , & Ferguson J. (1997). Discipline and practice: ‘The field’ as site, method, and location in anthropology. In Gupta A. , Ferguson J. , & Ferguson J. G. (Eds.), Anthropological locations: Boundaries and grounds of a field science (pp. 1–47). University of California Press.

Hine C. (2017). ‘Ethnographies of online communities and social media: Modes, varieties, affordances’. In Fielding N. G. , Lee R. M. , & Blank G. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of online research methods (pp. 401–415). SAGE Publications.

Marcus G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24(1), 95–117.

Roy S. C. (1912). The Mundas and their country. Asia Publishing House.

Roy S. C. (1915). The Oraons of Chota Nagpur. Brahmo Mission Press.

Ruby J. (Ed.) (1982). A crack in the mirror: Reflexive perspectives in anthropology. University of Pennsylvania Press.

Sundar N. , Deshpande S. , & Uberoi P. (2000). Indian anthropology and sociology: Towards a history. Economic and Political Weekly, 35(24), 1998–2002.