BabbieE. (2010). The practice of social research (12th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
2.
BuckN., ErmischJ. F., & JenkinsS. P. (1995). Choosing a longitudinal survey design: The issues. Colchester, UK: ESRC Research Centre on Micro-Social Change, University of Essex.
3.
GrovesR. M. (2006). Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70(5), 646–675.
4.
HeathO. (2016, August). The UK experience: A symposium on the state of Election Surveys in India. The Seminar Magazine issue on ‘Measuring Democracy’, Vol. 684. Retrieved from https://www.india-seminar.com/2016/684/684_oliver_heath.htm
5.
HillygusD. S., & GuayB. (2016, August). Polling in the United States. The Seminar Magazine issue on ‘Measuring Democracy’, Vol. 684. Retrieved from https://www.india-seminar.com/2016/684/684_hillygus_&_brian_guay.htm
6.
JenseniusF. R., & VerniersG. (2017). Studying Indian politics with large-scale data: Indian election data 1961-today. Studies in Indian Politics, 5(2), 269–275.
7.
KailashK. K. (2012). The more things change, the more they stay the same in India: The Bahujan and the paradox of the ‘democratic upsurge’. Asian Survey, 52(2), 321–347.
8.
KumarS., HeathA., & HeathO. (2002). Determinants of social mobility in India. Economic & Political Weekly, 37(29), 2983–87.
9.
KumarS., RaiP., & GuptaP. (2016, August). Do surveys influence results?The Seminar Magazine issue on ‘Measuring Democracy’, Vol. 684, pp. 61–63. Retrieved from https://www.india-seminar.com/2016/684/684_sanjay_kumar_et_al.htm
10.
Lokniti Team (2009). National election study 2009: A methodological note. Economic & Political Weekly, 44(39), 196–202.
11.
LynnP. (2011). Maintaining cross-sectional representativeness in a longitudinal general population survey (Understanding Society Working Paper Series No. 2011–04). Colchester, UK: Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex.
12.
NooruddinI. (2014). Making surveys work better: Experiments in public opinion research. Studies in Indian Politics, 2(1), 105–108.
13.
NooruddinI. (2016, August). Building better surveys. The Seminar Magazine issue on ‘Measuring Democracy’, Vol. 684, pp. 71–74. Retrieved from https://www.india-seminar.com/2016/684/684_irfan_nooruddin.htm
14.
PalshikarS. (2013). Election studies. In SuriK. C. (Ed.), Indian democracy, ICSSR Research surveys and explorations political science (pp. 161–208). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
15.
RaiP. (2014). Fallibility of opinion polls in India. Economic & Political Weekly, 49(18), 13–17.
16.
SircarN., & VaishnavM. (2016, August). Exploiting survey data. The Seminar Magazine issue on ‘Measuring Democracy’, Vol. 684. Retrieved from https://www.india-seminar.com/2016/684/684_neelanjan_&_m_vaishnav.htm
17.
VaidD. (2013). Perspectives on methods in political science. Studies in Indian Politics, 1(1), 103–107.
18.
VaidD. (2018). Uneven odds: Social mobility in contemporary India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
19.
YadavY. (2000). Understanding the second democratic upsurge: Trends of Bahujan participation in electoral politics in the 1990s. In FrankelF. R., HasanZ., BhargavaR., & AroraB. (Eds.), Transforming India (pp. 120–145). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
20.
YadavY., & PalshikarS. (2008). Ten theses on state politics in India. The Seminar Magazine issue 591. Retrieved from https://www.india-seminar.com/2008/591/591_y_yadav_&_s_palshkar.htm