BerinskyA., HuberG., & LenzG. (2012). Using mechanical Turk as a subject recruitment tool for experimental research. Political Analysis, 20, 351–368.
2.
BhogaleS. (2018, October). Querying the Indian parliament: What can the question hour tell us about Muslim representation in India? (TCPD Working Paper No. 2018-1). Sonipat: Trivedi Centre for Political Data, Ashoka University.
3.
EvansJ. A., & AcevesP. (2016). Machine translation: Mining text for social theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 42, 21–50.
4.
GrimmerJ. (2013). Representational style in congress: What legislators say and why it matters. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
5.
GrimmerJ. (2015). We are all social scientists now: How big data, machine learning, and causal inference work together. PS: Political Science & Politics, 48(1), 80–83.
6.
GrimmerJ., & StewartB. M. (2013). Text as data: The promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts. Political analysis, 21(3), 267–297.
7.
LoweW., & BenoitK. (2013). Validating estimates of latent traits from textual data using human judgment as a benchmark. Political Analysis, 21(3), 298–313.
8.
LucasC., NielsenR., RobertsM. E., StewartB. M., StorerA., & TingleyD. (2015). Computer assisted text analysis for comparative politics. Political Analysis, 23(2), 254–277.
9.
MillerM. C. (2013). Wronged by empire: Post-imperial ideology and foreign policy in India and China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
10.
MonroeB. L., & SchrodtP. A. (2008). Introduction to the special issue: The statistical analysis of political text. Political Analysis, 16(4), 351–355.
11.
PhadnisA., & KashyapA. (2019, January24). The political project behind ‘Mann ki Baat’: Analysis of Prime Minister speeches. Paper presented at the University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad.
12.
Schonhardt-BaileyC. (2006). From the corn laws to free trade: Interests, ideas, and institutions in historical perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.