Only looking at the Congress Party can obscure the fact that political dynasties, in different forms and degrees, exist in a number of political parties in India. There are many examples of political families ruling the roost across the states but digging deeper shows us that the malaise goes to the village level as well. Therefore, to completely examine the extent to which Indian politics is dynastic, this article investigates strategies and networks of a local political dynasty in the Meerut district of Uttar Pradesh (UP). It explores how a family, by getting elected its sons into the local political bodies, becomes a powerful political dynasty over a period of time and how entry of this dynasty into the Indian political system is assisted by political parties and caste associations. Furthermore, this article shows the ways in which popular notions of leadership and manhood play important role in the making of a dynast along with the importance of dynastic ties for the marginalized rather than privileged groups.
All India Jamiat-ul-Qureshi (1975). A Souvenir. In The pamphlet of the conference (translation from Urdu). Nagpur, Maharashtra.
2.
ArmaoF. (2015). Mafia-owned-democracies. Italy and Mexico as patterns of criminal neoliberalism. Revista de Historia Actual, 1, 4–21.
3.
BasuAmrita (2016). Women, dynasties, and democracy in India. In ChandraKanchan (Ed.), Democratic dynasties: state, party and family in contemporary Indian politics (pp. 136–172). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BerenschotW. (2011). On the usefulness of Goondas in Indian politics: ‘Moneypower’ and ‘musclepower’ in a Gujarati locality. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 34(2), 255–275.
5.
BlokA. (1972). The peasant and the brigand: Social banditry reconsidered. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 14(4), 494–510.
6.
BrassP. R. (1965). Factional politics in an Indian state: The congress party in Uttar Pradesh. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
7.
BrassP. (2011). An Indian Political Life: Charan Singh and Congress Politics (Vol. I, 1937 to 1961) (The Politics of Northern India 1937 To 2007). Delhi: SAGE.
8.
BrassP. (2012). Charan Singh and Congress Politics, 1957 to 1967 (Vol. II) (The Politics of Northern India 1937 To 2007). Delhi: SAGE.
9.
BriquetJ.-L., & Favarel-GarriguesG. (2010). Organized crime and states. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
10.
Census of India (2011). Census of India. New Delhi: Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs.
11.
ChhibberP. (2011). Dynastic parties: organization, finance and impact. Party Politics.
12.
ChandraK., & WamiqUmaira. (2011). India’s democratic dynasties. Seminar 622 (Special issue on Dynasties in South Asia).
13.
ChandraKanchan (1999). Post-Congress Politics in Uttar Pradesh: The ethnification of the party system and its consequences. In RoyR. and WallaceP. (Eds.), Indian Politics and the 1998 Election: Regionalism, Hindutva and state politics. New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
14.
ChandraKanchan. (ed.) (2016). Democratic Dynasties: State, Party and Family in Contemporary Indian Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
ChandraK. (2004). Why ethnic parties succeed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
ChubbJ. (1996). The mafia, the market and the state in Italy and Russia. Journal of Modern Italian Studies, 1(2), 273–291.
17.
CorbridgeS., & HarrissJ. (Eds.) (2001). Reinventing India. Liberalisation, Hindu nationalism and popular democracy. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
18.
DalBo, ErnestoDalBoPedro, & SnyderJason (2009). Political dynasties. Review of Economic Studies, 76(1), 115–142.
19.
DouglasWilson. (2015) The Politics of Protection Rackets in Post-New Order Indonesia: Coercive Capital, Authority and Street Politics. Routledge, London.
20.
DuncanI. (1997). New Political Equations in North India: Mayawati, Mulayam, and Government Instability in Uttar Pradesh. Asian Survey, 37(10), 979–996.
21.
GayerL. (2014). Karachi: Ordered disorder and the struggle for the city. London/Delhi/New York/Karachi: Hurst/HarperCollins/Oxford University Press.
22.
HansenT. B. (1999). The Saffron Wave: Democracy and Hindu Nationalism in Modern India. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
23.
HansenT. B. (2001). Wages of violence: Naming and identity in post-colonial Bombay. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24.
HansenT. B. (2005). Sovereigns beyond the state: On legality and public authority in India. In KaurR. (Ed.), Religion, violence and political mobilisation in South Asia (pp. 109–144). New Delhi: SAGE.
25.
JaffeR. (2013). The hybrid state: Crime and citizenship in urban Jamaica. American Ethnologist, 40(4), 734–748.
26.
JaffrelotC. (2003). India’s silent revolution: The rise of the low castes in North Indian politics. Delhi: Permanent Black.
27.
KothariR. (Ed). (1970). Caste in Indian politics. Delhi: Orient Longman.
28.
MicheluttiL. (2008). The vernacularisation of democracy: Politics, caste and religion in India. New Delhi: Routledge.
29.
MicheluttiL., . (2018). Mafia Raj: The Rule of Bosses in South Asia. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
30.
PaiS. (2002). Dalit assertion and the unfinished democratic revolution: the Bahujan Samaj Party in Uttar Pradesh. New Delhi. SAGE.
31.
PiliavskyA., & SbriccoliTommaso. (2016). The ethics of efficacy in north India’s goonda raj (rule of toughs). Journal of Royal Anthropological Institute, 22(2), 373–391.
32.
PriceP., & RuudA. E. (2010). Power and influence in India: Bosses, lords and captains. New Delhi: Routledge.
33.
RudolphL. I., & RudolphS. H. (1967). Modernity of tradition: political development in India. Bombay: Orient Longmans.
34.
RuudArild E., & IslamMohammad Mozahidul (2016). Political Dynasty Formation in Bangladesh. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 39(2), 401–414.
35.
SidelJ. (1999). Capital, coercion, and crime: Bossism in the Philippines. Stanford, CA: University of California Press.
36.
SinghJagpal (1998). Ambedkarisation and Assertion of Dalit Identity-Socio-Cultural Protest in Meerut District of Western Uttar Pradesh. Economic and Political Weekly, 33(40), 2611–2618.
37.
VaishnavM. (2011). The market for criminality: Money, muscle and elections in India. Retrieved from https://casi.sas.upenn.edu/sites/casi.sas.upenn.edu/files/iit/Market%20for%20Criminality%20-%20Aug%202011.pdf
38.
VolkovV. (2002). Violent entrepreneurs: The use of force in the making of Russian capitalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
39.
WilsonD. (2015). The politics of protection rackets in post-new order Indonesia: Coercive capital, authority and street politics. London, UK: Routledge.
40.
YadavY. (2000). Understanding the second democratic upsurge: Trends of Bahujan participation in electoral politics in the 1990s. In FrankelZ. H. F. R., BhargavaR. & AroraB. (Eds.), Transforming India. Social and political dynamics of democracy (pp. 120–145). Delhi: Oxford University Press.
