ChatterjeePartha (2001). On civil and political society in post-colonial democracies. In KavirajSudipta & KhilnaniSunil (Eds), Civil society: History and possibility (pp. 165–178). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
FernandesLionel. (1990). Political science in India—the crux?The Indian Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 15–21.
3.
KothariRajni. (1964). The Congress system in India. Asian Survey, 4(12), 1161–1173.
4.
MahajanGurpreet. (2013). India: Political ideas and the making of a democratic discourse. London: Zed Books.
5.
PetersB. Guy. (2014). Further thoughts on the relevance of political science: A response to Mathew Wood. Politics, 34(3), 287–290.
6.
PetersG., PierreJ., & StokerG. (2010). The relevance of political science. In MarshDavid & StokerGerry (Eds), Theory and methods in political science (3rd ed., pp. 325–342). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
7.
ShahGhanashyam. (2001). Political science in India: A discipline and intellectual pursuit. The Indian Journal of Political Science, 62(1), 11–23.
8.
StokerGerry, PetersB. Guy, & PierreJon (2015). Introduction. In Gerry StokerB.PetersGuy & PierreJon (Eds), The relevance of political science (pp. 1–15). London: Palgrave.
9.
WoodMathew. (2014). Bridging the relevance gap in political science. Politics, 34(3), 275–286.
10.
WoodMathew. (2015). Book review: The relevance of political science. Retrieved 26January2017, from http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/book-review-the-relevance-of-political-science/