The debates on the devolution of powers to the panchayats since the last two decades received enormous attention because of the increasing role played by these institutions in planning and implementation of the development programmes in rural India. But it is observed that devolution agenda including the agenda of fiscal devolution and tax decentralization has not been taken up sincerely in many states including the states of Andhra Pradesh and Odisha. Based on the review of secondary data, the present article critically examines the status of the fiscal devolution to the panchayats in the states of Andhra Pradesh and Odisha. This article argues that both the states need to strengthen the own revenue of panchayats based on the recommendations of the Finance Commissions of the respective states. In this context, the process of tax decentralization and principles of sharing the state taxes should receive paramount importance.
AlokV.N. (2006). Local government organization and finance: Rural India. In AnwarShah (ed.), Local governance in developing countries (pp. 205–231) Washington, DC: World Bank.
2.
AsfawA., FrohbergK., JamesK.S., & JuttingJ. (2004). Modeling the impact of fiscal decentralisation on health outcomes, empirical evidence from India (pp. 1–29). Bonn: Centre for Development Research, ZEF Discussion Paper on Development Policy.
3.
BardhanP. (1996). Decentralized development. Indian Economic Review, 31(2), 139–156.
4.
BardhanP., & MookherjeeDilip. (2000). Capture and governance at local and national levels. American Economic Review, 90(2), 135–139.
5.
BoexJ. (2009). Fiscal decentralisation and intergovernmental finance reforms as an international development strategy (IDG Working Paper No. 2009-06, pp. 1–24). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Centre on International Development and Governance.
6.
DharS. (2006). Tapping local resources to increase panchayat incomes. Economic and Political Weekly, 41(14), 1371–1375.
7.
GulatiC.J. (1996). Panchayati Raj in India: Problems and prospects (IRIS-India Working Paper No. 31). Maryland, US: Centre for Institutional Reform and Informal Sector(IRIS), University of Maryland.
8.
JhaS. (2002). Strengthening local governments: Rural fiscal decentralisation in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 37(26), 2611–2623.
9.
ManorJ. (1999). The political economy of democratic decentralization (Directions in Development Series). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
10.
ManorJ. (2002). Democratic decentralisation in two Indian states: Past and present. The Indian Journal of Political Science, 63(1), 51–71.
11.
Ministry of Panchayati Raj. (2012). Devolution to panchayats in India: Ranking functional environment at sub-national level, empirical assessment, 2011–12. Retrieved 19April2012, from www.panchayat.gov.in
12.
OommenM.A. (1998). Devolution of resources to rural local bodies: A comparative study of select state finance commission reports (Institute of Social Sciences occasional paper series 21). New Delhi: Institute of Social Sciences.
13.
OommenM.A. (Ed.). (2008). Fiscal decentralisation to local governments in India. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
14.
OommenM.A. (2010). Have the state Finance Commissions fulfilled their constitutional mandates. Economic and Political Weekly, 45(30), 39–44.
15.
PalharyaS. (2003). Madhya Pradesh; decentralised governance hampered by fiscal constraint. Economic and Political Weekly, 38(11), 1025–1028.
16.
RajaramanI., BohraO.P., & RenganathanV.S. (1996). Augmentation of panchayat resources. Economic and Political Weekly, 31(18), 1071–1083.
17.
RaniP.G. (1999). State Finance Commissions and Rural Local Bodies: Devolution of Resources. Economic and Political Weekly, 34(25), 1632–1639.
18.
RaoK.V.N., & Sundar RamD. (1990). Political development in Andhra Pradesh 1978–1989—A study. The Indian Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 540–564.
19.
ReddyM.G. (2003). Status of decentralised local bodies; post-73rd amendment scenario. Economic and Political Weekly, 38(12–13), 1284–1292.
20.
ReddyM.G., & SreedeviN. (2004). Local finances in Andhra Pradesh: A situation analysis. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 50(3), 829–839.
21.
RondenelliD. (1981). Government decentralisation in comparative perspective: Theory and practice in developing countries. International Review of Administrative Science, 47(2), 133–145.
22.
SarumathyM. (n.d.). Andhra Pradesh. In ChoudhuryR.C. & JainS.P. (Eds), Patterns of decentralised governance in rural India (Vol. 1, pp. 25–63). Hyderabad: National Institute of Rural Development.
23.
World Bank. (2006, 15June. India–Inclusive growth and service delivery: Building on India’s success, development policy review (Report No. 34580). Washington, DC: World Bank.
24.
XaxaJ. (2006). Grama panchayat in Odisha. Orissa Review, 62(7–8), 75–81.
