BeaulieuEmily A. (2014). From voter ID to party ID: How political parties affect perceptions of electoral fraud in the United States. Manuscript, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
2.
CorstangeDaniel. (2009). Sensitive questions, truthful answers? Modeling the list experiment with LISTIT. Political Analysis, 17(1), 45–63.
3.
CorstangeDaniel. (2012). Vote trafficking in Lebanon. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 44(3), 483–505.
4.
DruckmanJamesGreenDonaldKuklinskiJamesLupiaArthur. (2006). The growth and development of experimental research in political science. American Political Science Review, 100(4), 627–35.
5.
GrovesRobert M. (2011). Three eras of survey research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(5), 861–871.
6.
HanmerMichael J.BanksAntoine J.WhiteIsmail K. (2014). Experiments to reduce the over-reporting of voting: A pipeline to the truth. Political Analysis, 22(1), 130–141.
7.
HillygusD. Sunshine. (2011). The evolution of election polling in the United States. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(5), 962–981.
8.
KinderDonald R.PalfreyThomas R. (1993). On behalf of an experimental political science. In KinderDonald R.PalfreyThomas R. (Eds.), Experimental foundations of political science. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 1–40.
9.
KingGaryHonakerJamesJosephAnneScheveKenneth. (2001). Analyzing incomplete political science data: An alternative algorithm for multiple imputation. American Political Science Review, 95(1), 49–69.
10.
KingGaryMurrayChristopher J.L.SalomonJoshua A.TandonAjay. (2004). Enhancing the validity and cross-cultural comparability of measurement in survey research. American Political Science Review, 98(1), 191–207.
11.
SnidermanPaul M.GrobDouglas B. (1996). Innovations in experimental design in attitude surveys. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 377–399.
