The Indian Forest Policy of 1988 and the subsequent government resolution on participatory forest management emphasized the need for people’s participation in natural forest management. This article lays out the institutions that emerge from this strategy and their involvement in decentralized Forest Resource Management. It also traces the inter-linkages between them in the governance of the forest resource in the Nilgiris district of Tamil Nadu.
Two levels of inquiry have been undertaken, one at the institutional level and the other at the household level. Based on data collected, using quantitative and qualitative methods, it is found that the presence of civil society organizations (CSOs) have an effect on the functioning of government institutions. The article informs the assessment that decentralization has a two-pronged function of bringing governance closer to the people and to also bring more political will to the people.
AgrawalA. (2001). The regulatory community: Decetralization and the panchayats environment in the van panchayats environment in the van (forest councils) of Kumaon, india. Mountain Research and Development, 2(3), 208–211.
2.
AgrawalA.OstromE. (2004). Collective action, property rights, and devolution of forest and protected area management.CGIAR Systemwide Program on Collective Action and Property Rights. Retrieved 15January2013, from http://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/bitstream/handle/10535/1465/Collective_Action%2c_Property.pdf?sequence=1
3.
BardhanP. (2002, Fall). Decentralization of governance and development. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(4), 185–205.
4.
ChhatreA.AgarwalA. (2012). Institutional governance format. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois.
5.
CrookR.ManorJ. (1998). Democracy and decentralisation in South Asia and West.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
FoxJ.ArandaJ. (1996). Decentralization and rural development in Mexico: Community participation in Oaxaca’s municipal funds program.San Diego, CA: Center for U.S.-Mexico Studies, University of California.
7.
GregersenH.Contreras-HermosillaA.WhiteA.PhillipsL. (2004). Forest governance in federal systems: An overview of experiences and implications for decentralization.Bogor Barat, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research. Retrieved 24April2013, from http://www.forest-trends.org/documents/files/doc_122.pdf
8.
KolavalliS. (1995). Joint forest management: Superior property rights?Economic and Political Weekly, 30(30), 1933–1938.
9.
LarsonA. M. (2004). Democratic decentralisation in the forestry sector: Lessons learned from Africa, Asia and Latin America.Nicaragua: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).
10.
LarsonA. M.RibotJ. C. (2004, Spring). Democratic decentralisation through a natural resource lens: An introduction. European Journal of Development Research, 16(1), 1–25.
11.
LarsonA. M.SotoF. (2008). Decentralization of natural resource governance regimes. The Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 33(1), 213–239.
12.
LitvackJ.JunaidA.BirdR. (2000). Rethinking decentralization at the World Bank.Washington, DC: World Bank.
13.
MandelbaumD. G. (1982). The Nilgiris as a region. Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 17, No. 36, September41982, pp. 1459–1467.
14.
MasscheleinJ.QuaghebeurK. (2006). Participation making a difference? Critical analysis of the participatory claims of change, reversal, and empowerment. Interchange, 37(4), 309–331.
15.
MoEF. (1988). National forest policy (1988). Resolution No. 3-1/86-FP.New Delhi: Department of Environment, Forests and Wildlife.
16.
MurrayR. (1990). Joint forest management resolution. Resolution No. 6-21/89-FP.New Delhi: Department of Environment, Forests and Wildlife.
17.
MohantyP. K. (2004). Encyclopaedia of primitive tribes in India, Volume 1. Delhi: Gyan Publishing House.
18.
ParthasarathyJ. (2008). The Toda of the Nilgiri district.Udhagamandalam: Hill Area Development Programme (HADP).
19.
PrasadR. (1999). Joint forest management in India and the impact of state control over non-wood forest products. Retrieved 29March2013, from Non-wood forest products and income generation: http://www.fao.org/docrep/x2450e/x2450e0c.htm
20.
RaghunandanT. (2012). Introduction. In RaghunandanT. (Ed.), Decentralisation and local govenments (pp. 1–23). New Delhi: Orient Blackswan Pvt ltd.
21.
RibotJ. (2002a). Afrícan decentralization: Local actors, powers and accountability. Democracy, Govemance and Human Rights Working Paper, No.8.
22.
RibotJ. (2002b). Democratic decentralization of natural resources: Institutionalizing.Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
23.
SayerJ.ElliottC.BarrowE.GretzingerS.MaginnisS.McShaneT.ShepherdG. (2004). The implications for biodiversity conservation of decentralised forest resources management. The UNFF inter-sessional workshop on decentralisation (pp. 1–24). Switzerland: Center for International Forestry Research. Retrieved 24April2013, from http://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/events/documentations/interlaken/papers/JSayer.pdf
24.
SchneiderA. (2003, Fall). Decentralization: Conceptualization. Studies in Comparative International Development, 38(3), 32–56.
25.
SharmaA.KabraA.KinhalG.PanwarH.MisraM. K.UpadhyayS.UpadhyayV. (2004). Lessons learned from eco-development experiences in India: A study.New Delhi: Project Tiger. Retrieved from http://projecttiger.nic.in/pdf/peace.pdf (accessed 1 March 2013).
26.
Tamil Nadu Forest Department. (2007a). Retrieved 29March2013, from http://www.forests.tn.nic.in/ProjectPrograms/projectprograms_home.html
27.
Tamil Nadu Forest Department (2007b). Tamil Nadu afforestation project: (2012–13). Retrieved 30March2013, from Tamil Nadu Forest Department: http://www.forests.tn.nic.in/ProjectPrograms/graphics/TAP%20PHASE%20II.pdf
28.
UNDP. (2007–2008). Human development report 2007–2008 Technical Note 1. Retrieved 2March2013, from http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDR_20072008_Tech_Note_1.pdf
29.
UNDP (2011). Frequently asked questions (FAQs) about the human development index (HDI). Retrieved 4March2013, from Human Development Index (HDI): http://hdr.undp.org/en/faq-page
30.
UNESCAP. (2004). What is good governance?. Retrieved 1May2013, from http://www.unescap.org/pdd/prs/ProjectActivities/Ongoing/gg/governance.asp
31.
YulianiE. L. (2004). Decentralization, deconcentration and devolution: What do they mean?Interlaken Workshop on Decentralization (pp. 27–30). Interlaken, Switzerland: Center for International Forestry Research. Retrieved from Center for International Forestry Research publication website: http://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/interlaken/Compilation.pdf (accessed 3 May 2013).
