This article explores how Goa’s politics have evolved in conjunction with national politics. It finds that there has been an evolution from communal regional party government dominated by the Maharashtrawadi Gomantak Party (MGP) to the supremacy of two national parties—the Indian National Congress (INC) and Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)—that now dominate the politics of the state, while the situation in New Delhi has moved from national party supremacy to the rise of regional parties at the expense of national institutions. In that sense Goa’s politics continue to be at variance from the national pattern. However, its pattern of unstable coalitions and pervasive defections resembles the national pattern.
AmonkarSuresh G.GaitondePundalik D.DiasEnfemianoDulcoGurudasTambaMohan (n.d.). Goa opinion poll, Analytical study of voting pattern. Bastora.
2.
BrassPaul R. (1990). The politics of India since independence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
CottaL. Carvalho. (1966). Goa: The anatomy of merger politics. Delhi: Goa, Daman & Diu Territorial Congress Committee.
4.
Das GuptaJyotirinda. (1970). Language, conflict and national development. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5.
Deccan Herald. (2012, February22>). Bangalore.
6.
De SouzaPeter Ronald. (1996a). A democratic verdict. Economic and Political Weekly, 31(2–3), 13–20January, 149–152.
7.
De SouzaPeter Ronald. (1996b). The accountability factor. Seminar, No. 440, 36–39.
8.
De SouzaPeter Ronald. (1999). Pragmatic politics in Goa, 1987–99. Economic and Political Weekly, 31(34–35), 21–28August, 2434–2439.
9.
Economic Times. (2012, February10>). Mumbai.
10.
EstevesSarto (1966). Goa and its future. Bombay: Manaktalas.
11.
FernandesAureliano. (1997). Cabinet government in Goa. Panaji: Maureen & Canvet Pub.
12.
FernandesAureliano. (2003). Elections 1999: A ‘Yes Vote’ for defectors in Goa. In WallacePaulRoyRamashray (Eds), India’s 1999 elections and 20th century politics (pp. 187–205). New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
13.
GaitondePundalikManiA. D. (1956). The Goa problem. New Delhi: Indian Council of World Affairs, pp. 23–24.
14.
Goa Today. (March1994). An unending maze. Goa Today.
15.
Hindustan Times. (1963, December14>). New Delhi.
16.
JaffrelotChristophe (2007). The rise of the lower castes in north Indian politics, the BSP in Uttar Pradesh: Whose party is it? In MichaelS.M. (Ed.), Dalits in modern India, 2nd ed. (pp. 260–284). New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
17.
JaffrelotChristopheVerniersGilles (2009). The 2009 elections: The resilience of regionalism and ethnicity. South Asia Multidisciplinary Journal, 3(3), 1–25.
18.
JoshiRam (1964). The General Elections in Goa. Asian Survey, 4(4), 1093–1101.
19.
KochanekStanley A. (1968). The Congress party of India. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
20.
KothariRajni. (1964). The Congress ‘System’ in India. Asian Survey, 4(12), 1161–1173.
21.
LijphardtArend (1996). The puzzle of Indian democracy: A consociational interpretation. American Political Science Review, 90(2), 258–268.
22.
ManorJames (2011). The Congress party and the ‘Great Transformation’. In RupareliaSanjayReddySanjayHarrissJohnCorbridgeStuart (Eds), Understanding India’s new political economy (pp. 204–220). London and New York: Routledge.
23.
Morris-JonesW. H. (1966). Dominance and dissent. Government and Opposition, I(4), 451–466.
24.
Navhind Times (Panjim). (1970, June7>).
25.
Navhind Times (Panjim). (2012, January26>).
26.
NehruJawaharlal (1956). The Goa question. New Delhi: Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India.
27.
Portugal Overseas and the Question of Goa, Statements and Testimonies. n.d. Lisboa: Agencia-Geraldo Do Ultramar.
28.
RikerWilliam H. (1962). The theory of political coalitions. New Haven: Yale University Press.
29.
RubinoffArthur G. (1971). India’s use of force in Goa. Bombay: Popular Prakashan.
30.
RubinoffArthur G. (1990). India’s electoral system as a determinant of its party system. In LeleJayantVoraRajendra (Eds), Boeings and bullock-carts (pp. 95–110). Delhi: Chanakya Publications.
31.
RubinoffArthur G. (1998a). The construction of a political community, integration and identity in Goa. New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
32.
RubinoffArthur G. (1998b). The decline of India’s parliament. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 4(4), 13–33.
33.
RubinoffArthur G. (1999). Conflicting ambitions in Goa’s parliamentary elections. In RoyRamashrayWallacePaul (Eds), Indian politics in the 1998 election, regionalism, Hindutva and state politics (pp. 265–286). New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
34.
RubinoffArthur G. (2002). The State of Goa. Daxiyanggio, 2(2), 183.
35.
RubinoffArthur G. (2003). The continuous election campaign in Goa. In WallacePaulRoyRamashray (Eds), India’s 1999 elections and 20th century politics (pp. 167–186). New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
36.
SaksenaR. N. (1974). Goa into the mainstream. New Delhi: Abhinav Publications.
37.
SartoriGiovani (1976). Parties and party systems, A framework for analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
The Herald (Panjam). (2011, December12>).
39.
The Hindu. A House of crorepatis in Goa. Retrieved from http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article2985584.ece
40.
Times of India. (1963, December13>). New Delhi.
41.
Times of India. (1980, January10>). New Delhi.
42.
VarshneyAshutosh (2000). Is India becoming more democratic?Journal of Asian Studies, 59(1), 3–25.
43.
WeinerMyron (1957). Party politics in India. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
