Two tropes have dominated discussions of Indian federalism: fiscal and constitutional. Isolated exceptions aside, scholars have not linked India’s federalism to comparative theories of nationalism, or to a comparative exploration of national identities. To examine how India’s federalism has done, we may also need to ask what kind of nation India is. Once we answer that question, the oft-assumed binary—that the stronger the states are, the weaker the centre will be–loses its edge. Both can be simultaneously strong. The new exception may be the problem of cross-border terrorism, which indeed generates a binary for the new age. Secessionism also creates centre–state binaries, but that may be more on account of how the basic ideational principles of Indian nationhood have been violated, not followed, or about how far the historical process of nation-building penetrated the rebellious regions. Such problems have not been about the basic flaws of Indian federalism.
AhujaAmitVarshneyAshutosh (2005). Antecedent nationhood, subsequent statehood: explaining the success of Indian federalism. In Phillip G.RoederDonaldRothchild (Eds), Sustainable Peace: Power and Democracy after Civil Wars (pp. 241–264). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
2.
AustinGranville (1999). The Indian constitution: cornerstone of a nation. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
3.
BhattacharyaM. (1992). The mind of the founding fathers. In N.MukarjiB.Arora (Eds), Federalism in India: Origins and Development (pp. 87–104). New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House.
4.
BhattacharyaM. (1991). Pluralism, regionalism and decentralizing tendencies in contemporary Indian politics. In Ethnicity and nationalism (pp. 114–166). New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
GellnerErnest (1983). Nations and nationalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
7.
GolwalkarM.S. (1947). We or our nationood defined. Pune: Publisher Kale.
8.
Government of Tamil Nadu. (1971). Report of the centre-state relations inquiry committee 1971. Madras: Director of Stationery and Printing.
9.
GopalSarvepalli (2011). Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography, Volume 2 (reprinted). Delhi: Oxford University Press.
10.
GrahamBruce (2007). Hindu nationalism and Indian politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
HobsbawmEric1990. Nations and nationalism since 1780. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
HorowitzDonald (1985). Ethnic groups in conflict. Berkley, London: University of California Press.
13.
KhemaniStuti (2003). Partisan politics and intergovernmental transfers in India. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3016, April.
14.
KingRobert D. (1997). Nehru and the language politics of India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
15.
KymlickaWill (1996). Multicultural citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
LijphartArend (1977). Democracy in plural societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
17.
RaoM. GovindaSinghNirvikar (2005). Political economy of federalism in India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
18.
NooruddinIrfanChhibberPradeep (2008). Unstable politics: fiscal space and electoral volatility in the Indian states. Comparative Political Studies, 41(8): 1069–1091.
19.
RudolphLloydRudolphSusanne (2010a). Federalism as state formation in India: A theory of shared and negotiated sovereignty. International Political Science Review, 31(5): 1–21.
20.
RudolphLloydRudolphSusanne (2010b). The old and new federalism in independent India. In PaulBrass (Ed.), Routledge handbook of south asian politics (pp. 147–161). London: Routledge.
21.
SheshadriH.V.SudarshanK. S.RaoSuryaNarainK.MadhokBalraj (1990). Why Hindu rashtra. Delhi: Suruchi Prakashan.
22.
SinghGurharpal (2000). Ethnic conflict in India: A case study of Punjab. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
23.
Sridharan.E. (1999). Coalition formation and coalition politics in India. In D. D.KhannaGert W.Kueck (Eds), Principles, Power and Politics (pp. 270–290). New Delhi: McMillan.
24.
StepanAlfred (1999). Federalism and democracy: Beyond the US model. Journal of Democracy10(4): 19–34.
25.
StepanAlfredLinzJuanYadavYogendra (2011). Crafting state-nations: India and other multinational democracies. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
26.
StuligrossDavidVarshneyAshutosh (2002). Constitutional design and ethnic pluralism in India. In AndrewReynolds (Ed.), The architecture of democracy (pp. 429–458). New York: Oxford University Press.
27.
TillinLouise (2007). United in diversity? Asymmetry in Indian federalism. Publius, 37(1): 45–67.
28.
UpadhyayDeen Dayal (1992). Akhand Bharat aur Muslim samasya (Undivided India and the Muslim problem). Noida: Jagriti Prakashan.
29.
VarshneyAshutosh (2002). Ethnic conflict and civic life: Hindus and Muslims in India. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.
WeberEugene (1976). Peasants into Frenchmen, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
32.
WeinerMyron (1978). Sons of the soil: Migration and ethnic conflict in India. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
33.
YadavYogendraPalshikarSuhas (2003). From hegemony to convergence: Party system and electoral politics in Indian states. Journal of Indian School of Political Economy, 15(1–2): 5–44.
34.
YadavYogendraPalshikarSuhas (2009a). Revisiting third electoral system: Mapping electoral trends in India, 2004–09. In SandeepShastriK.C.SuriYogendraYadav, Electoral politics in Indian states (pp. 393–429). New Delhi: OUP.
35.
YadavYogendraPalshikarSuhas (2009b). Ten theses on state politics in India. In ShastriElectoral politics in Indian states (pp. 46–63). New Delhi: OUP.
