It is crucial to understand how environmentally friendly investments are interrelated with commodity futures. This study examines the quantile connectedness among global environmental, social and governance (ESG) stocks and commodities using the quantile vector autoregression (QVAR) approach on data spanning from May 2017 to April 2024. The findings exhibit higher return spillover in lower and upper quantiles and less spillover in the median quantile. Furthermore, during the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia–Ukraine war, connectedness has increased among ESG stocks and commodities in all market conditions. Further analysis indicates that Europe ESG leaders (EU_ESG) and USA ESG leaders (US_ESG) serve as diversifiers in all market scenarios, but world ESG leaders (WL_ESG) act as a diversifier just in the natural market. Emerging markets ESG leaders (EM_ESG) generally function as a risk absorber and, in calm times, act as a hedge against developed ESG shocks. Finally, gold functions as a safe haven in crises for environmentally friendly investments. Our findings provide valuable information to investors, policymakers and portfolio managers regarding portfolio diversification.
AdamsZ., CollotS., & KartsakliM. (2020). Have commodities become a financial asset? Evidence from ten years of financialization. Energy Economics, 89, 104769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104769
2.
AdhikariR., & PutnamK. J. (2020). Comovement in the commodity futures markets: An analysis of the energy, grains, and livestock sectors. Journal of Commodity Markets, 18, 100090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomm.2019.04.002
3.
AhmadI., IqbalS., KhanS., HanH., Vega-MuñozA., & Ariza-MontesA. (2022). Macroeconomic effects of crude oil shocks: Evidence from South Asian countries. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.967643
4.
AhmedA. D., & HuoR. (2021). Volatility transmissions across international oil market, commodity futures and stock markets: Empirical evidence from China. Energy Economics, 93, 104741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104741
5.
AliS., YoussefM., UmarM., & NaeemM. A. (2024). ESG meets DeFi: Exploring time-varying linkages and portfolio implications. International Journal of Finance & Economics. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.3060
6.
AnderssonE., HoqueM., RahmanM. L., UddinG. S., & JayasekeraR. (2022). ESG investment: What do we learn from its interaction with stock, currency and commodity markets?International Journal of Finance & Economics, 27(3), 3623–3639.
7.
AndoT., Greenwood-NimmoM., & ShinY. (2022). Quantile connectedness: Modeling tail behavior in the topology of financial networks. Management Science, 68(4), 2401–2431. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.3984
8.
BalG. R., & MaharanaA. K. (2023). Can equity market risk be diversified with the help of ESG investment and commodities?Global Business Review, 09721509231189573. https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509231189573
9.
BarsonZ., OforiK. S., JuniorP. O., BoakyeK. G., & AmpongG. O. A. (2024). Time-varying connectedness between ESG stocks and BRVM traditional stocks. Journal of Emerging Market Finance, 23(3), 306–335.
10.
BasakS., & PavlovaA. (2016). A model of financialization of commodities. The Journal of Finance, 71(4), 1511–1556. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12408
11.
BaurD. G., & LuceyB. M. (2010). Is gold a hedge or a safe haven? An analysis of stocks, bonds and gold. Financial Review, 45(2), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6288.2010.00244.x
12.
BhattacherjeeP., MishraS., & BouriE. (2024). Does asset-based uncertainty drive asymmetric return connectedness across regional ESG markets?Global Finance Journal, 61, 100972.
13.
BhattacherjeeP., MishraS., & KangS. H. (2024). Extreme time-frequency connectedness across U.S. sector stock and commodity futures markets. International Review of Economics & Finance, 93, 1176–1197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.05.021
14.
BoungouW., & YatiéA. (2024). Uncertainty, stock and commodity prices during the Ukraine-Russia war. Policy Studies, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2024.2302440
15.
CagliE. C. C., MandaciP. E., & TaşkınD. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investing and commodities: Dynamic connectedness and risk management strategies. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 14(5), 1052–1074. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-01-2022-0014
16.
CarterC. A., & PowerG. J. (2018). Introduction to the special issue on the financialization of commodities. Journal of Commodity Markets, 10, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomm.2018.05.006
17.
CerquetiR., CicirettiR., DalòA., & NicolosiM. (2021). ESG investing: A chance to reduce systemic risk. Journal of Financial Stability, 54, 100887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2021.100887
18.
ChenB., & SunY. (2024). Financial market connectedness between the U.S. and China: A new perspective based on non-linear causality networks. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, 90, 101886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2023.101886
19.
CupriakD., KuziakK., & PopczykT. (2020). Risk management opportunities between socially responsible investments and selected commodities. Sustainability, 12(5), 2003. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12052003
20.
DaiY. (2021). Can ESG investing beat the market and improve portfolio diversification? Evidence from China. The Chinese Economy, 54(4), 272–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/10971475.2020.1857063
21.
DiboogluS., CevikE. I., & GillmanM. (2022). Gold, silver, and the US dollar as harbingers of financial calm and distress. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 86, 200–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2022.07.003
22.
DingS., CuiT., ZhengD., & DuM. (2021). The effects of commodity financialization on commodity market volatility. Resources Policy, 73, 102220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102220
23.
DreyerJ. K., MoreiraM., SmithW. T., & SharmaV. (2023). Do environmental, social and governance practices affect portfolio returns? Evidence from the US stock market from 2002 to 2020. Review of Accounting and Finance, 22(1), 37–61.
24.
DuttaA., BouriE., DuttaP., & SaeedT. (2021). Commodity market risks and green investments: Evidence from India. Journal of Cleaner Production, 318, 128523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128523
25.
EisenkopfJ., JuranekS., & WalzU. (2022). Responsible Investment and stock market shocks: Short-term insurance without persistence. British Journal of Management, 34(3), 1420–1439. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12664
26.
ElliottG., RothenbergT. J., & StockJ. H. (1996). Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica, 64(4), 813. https://doi.org/10.2307/2171846
27.
FisherT. J., & GallagherC. M. (2012). New weighted portmanteau statistics for time series goodness of fit testing. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 107(498), 777–787. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2012.688465
28.
GabauerD. (2021). Dynamic measures of asymmetric & pairwise connectedness within an optimal currency area: Evidence from the ERM I system. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 60, 100680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2021.100680
29.
GieseG., LeeL., MelasD., NagyZ., & NishikawaL. (2019). Performance and risk analysis of index-based ESG portfolios. The Journal of Index Investing, 9(4), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.3905/jii.2019.9.4.046
30.
HotiS., McAleerM., & PauwelsL. L. (2007). Measuring risk in environmental finance. Journal of Economic Surveys, 21(5), 970–998. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00526.x
31.
JainM., SharmaG. D., & SrivastavaM. (2019). Can sustainable investment yield better financial returns: A comparative study of ESG indices and MSCI indices. Risks, 7(1), 15.
32.
JarqueC. M., & BeraA. K. (1980). Efficient tests for normality, homoscedasticity and serial independence of regression residuals. Economics Letters, 6(3), 255–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(80)90024-5
33.
JiangW., & ChenY. (2022). The time-frequency connectedness among metal, energy and carbon markets pre and during COVID-19 outbreak. Resources Policy, 77, 102763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102763
34.
KatsampoxakisI., XanthopoulosS., BasdekisC., & ChristopoulosA. G. (2024). Can ESG stocks be a safe haven during global crises? Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine war with time-frequency wavelet analysis. Economies, 12(4), 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies12040089
35.
KhouryR. E., NasrallahN., HussaineyK., & AssafR. (2023). Spillover analysis across FinTech, ESG, and renewable energy indices before and during the Russia–Ukraine war: International evidence. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting/Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 34(2), 279–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/jifm.12179
36.
KilicY., DestekM. A., CevikE. I., BuganM. F., KorkmazO., & DiboogluS. (2022). Return and risk spillovers between the ESG global index and stock markets: Evidence from time and frequency analysis. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22, S141–S156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2022.11.015
37.
KoopG., PesaranM., & PotterS. M. (1996). Impulse response analysis in nonlinear multivariate models. Journal of Econometrics, 74(1), 119–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(95)01753-4
38.
LiY., & UmairM. (2023). The protective nature of gold during times of oil price volatility: An analysis of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Extractive Industries and Society, 15, 101284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2023.101284
39.
MahanamaT. K., ShirvaniA., RachevS. T., & FabozziF. J. (2024). Environmental indices in global markets: Innovating financial tools for sustainable investments. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4675036
40.
MaitraD., & DawarV. (2018). Return and volatility spillover among commodity futures, stock market and exchange rate: Evidence from India. Global Business Review, 20(1), 214–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150918803801
41.
Marín-RodríguezN. J., Gonzalez-RuizJ. D., & BoteroS. (2024). Connectedness between Sustainable Investment Indexes: The QVAR approach. Economies, 12(7), 170. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies12070170
42.
MarkowitzH. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1952.tb01525.x
43.
MeiraE., CunhaF. A. F. D. S., OrsatoR. J., Miralles-QuirósM. M., & Miralles-QuirósJ. L. (2023). The added value and differentiation among ESG investment strategies in stock markets. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), 1816–1834.
44.
MensiW., HammoudehS., Al-JarrahI. M. W., SensoyA., & KangS. H. (2017). Dynamic risk spillovers between gold, oil prices and conventional, sustainability and Islamic equity aggregates and sectors with portfolio implications. Energy Economics, 67, 454–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.08.031
45.
NdawonaT., KeetonG., CattaneoN., & MannL. (2019). An analysis of the impact of the financialization of commodity markets. Studies in Economics and Econometrics, 43(1), 63–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/10800379.2019.12097344
46.
NittayakamolphunP., BejranandaT., & PholkerdP. (2024). Asymmetric effects of uncertainty and commodity markets on sustainable stock in seven emerging markets. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(4), 155. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17040155
47.
OlsonE., VivianA., & WoharM. E. (2017). Do commodities make effective hedges for equity investors? Research in International Business and Finance, 42, 1274–1288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.064
48.
OzcelebiO., & KangS. H. (2024). Extreme connectedness and network across financial assets and commodity futures markets. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 71, 102099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2024.102099
49.
PediniL., & SeveriniS. (2025). Are there other fish in the sea? Exploring the hedge, diversifier and safe-haven features of ESG investments. Studies in Economics and Finance, 42(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/sef-05-2023-0255
50.
PesaranH., & ShinY. (1998). Generalized impulse response analysis in linear multivariate models. Economics Letters, 58(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-1765(97)00214-0
51.
PotharlaS., TurubilliS. K., & ShekarM. C. (2024). The social pillar of ESG: Exploring the link between social sustainability and stock price synchronicity. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 17(1), 130–152.
52.
RahmanM. A., & HasanM. B. (2025). Quantifying dynamic connectedness among diverse green and sustainable financial assets: Evidence from quantile-base VAR technique. Finance Research Open, 1(2), 100007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finr.2025.100007
53.
SahadudheenI., & KumarP. K. S. (2023). Time-varying relationship and volatility spillovers among oil, gold, forex and stock markets in Indian context: The juxtaposition of global economic crisis and COVID-19 pandemic. The Indian Economic Journal, 71(4), 748–767. https://doi.org/10.1177/00194662231166168
54.
SalemS. B., & JeribiA. (2025). The nexus of blue economy, green finance, and energy commodities: A quantile VAR approach. Modern Finance, 3(2), 96–119. https://doi.org/10.61351/mf.v3i2.272
55.
ShaikhI. (2021). On the relation between pandemic disease outbreak news and crude oil, gold, gold mining, silver and energy markets. Resources Policy, 72, 102025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102025
56.
SharmaI., BambaM., VermaB., & VermaB. (2024). Dynamic connectedness and investment strategies between commodities and ESG stocks: Evidence from India. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 18(3), 67–84.
57.
SharmaC., & RaniP. (2025). Dynamic interconnectedness of ESG indices and crude oil prices: A wavelet coherence approach in Asia-Pacific markets. Australian Economic Papers. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.12392
58.
TangK., & XiongW. (2012). Index investment and the financialization of commodities. Financial Analysts Journal, 68(6), 54–74. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v68.n6.5
59.
TürsoyT., & FaisalF. (2018). The impact of gold and crude oil prices on stock market in Turkey: Empirical evidences from ARDL bounds test and combined cointegration. Resources Policy, 55, 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.10.014
60.
VinodkumarN., & AlarifiG. (2022). Environmental social governance: A core value to responsible stakeholders and stock market sustainability in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 12(4), 1085–1101.
61.
WangJ., MishraS., SharifA., & ChenH. (2024). Dynamic spillover connectedness among green finance and policy uncertainty: Evidence from QVAR network approach. Energy Economics, 131, 107330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107330
62.
YangJ., AgyeiS. K., BossmanA., GubarevaM., & Marfo-YiadomE. (2024). Energy, metals, market uncertainties, and ESG stocks: Analysing predictability and safe havens. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 69, 102030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2023.102030
63.
YangB., PuY., & SuY. (2020). The financialization of Chinese commodity markets. Finance Research Letters, 34, 101438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101438
