Research papers on female labour force participation (FLFP) are neither rare nor uncommon. However, papers measuring unpaid female labour are not many. This paper estimates the increase in gross domestic product (GDP) due to an increase in FLFP using two rounds of data from the Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS) of India. To show the effect of including female workers who are out of the labour force on the national income of the country, I adopt the method of imputing incomes for women not in employment, accounting for two scenarios: (a) without work and without a child and (b) without work and with a child. The estimates from our sample suggest an increase of 31% in total income earned if women who are out of the labour force are employed gainfully. Moreover, increasing participation of women aged 36–55 could make a substantial contribution towards reducing the gap between per capita income of India at present and the target it has set to achieve.
AddatiL., CattaneoU., EsquivelV., & ValarinoI. (2018). Care work and care jobs for the future of decent work. International Labour Office.
2.
AfridiF., BishnuM., & MahajanK. (2024). What determines women’s labor supply? The role of home productivity and social norms. Journal of Demographic Economics, 90(1), 55–87.
3.
AfridiF., DinkelmanT., & MahajanK. (2018). Why are fewer married women joining the work force in rural India? A decomposition analysis over two decades. Journal of Population Economics, 31(3), 783–818.
4.
AmaranteV., & RosselC. (2018). Unfolding patterns of unpaid household work in Latin America. Feminist Economics, 24(1), 1–34.
5.
AntonopoulosR. (2008). The unpaid care work paid work connection(No. 541). Working paper. Levy Economics Institute of Bard College.
6.
AntonopoulosR., & HirwayI. (2010). Unpaid work and the economy. In Unpaid work and the economy: Gender, time use and poverty in developing countries (pp. 1–21). Palgrave Macmillan.
7.
BalcázarC. F., CerianiL., OlivieriS., & RanzaniM. (2017). Rent-imputation for welfare measurement: A review of methodologies and empirical findings. Review of Income and Wealth, 63(4), 881–898.
8.
BernhardtA., FieldE., PandeR., RigolN., SchanerS., & Troyer-MooreC. (2018). Male social status and women’s work. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 108, 363–367.
9.
BertrandM., KamenicaE., & PanJ. (2015). Gender identity and relative income within households. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(2), 571–614.
10.
BryantJ., JacobsenV., BellM., & GarrettD. (2004). Labour force participation and GDP in New Zealand. The Treasury, New Zealand Government.
11.
BudlenderD. (2010). What do time use studies tell us about unpaid care work? Evidence from seven countries. In Time use studies and unpaid care work (pp. 23–67). Routledge.
12.
CerianiL., OlivieriS. D., & RanzaniM. (2019). Housing, imputed rent, and households’ welfare[World Bank policy research working paper 8955]. World Bank.
13.
ChakrabortyS., & MukherjeeS. (2014). Gender wage gap in the Indian labour market: Evidence from the NSS 66th round data. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 57(2), 259–280.
14.
ChakrabortyA., & SutradharR. (2023). Unpaid work by women: A state-level analysis of evidence from time-use survey. Indian Journal of Human Development, 17(3), 461–476.
15.
ChatterjeeU., MurgaiR., & RamaM. (2015). Job opportunities along the rural-urban gradation and female labor force participation in India[World Bank policy research working paper 7412]. World Bank.
16.
ChopraD. (2015). Balancing paid work and unpaid care work to achieve women’s economic empowerment. Institute of Development Studies.
17.
DesaiS. (2017). Declining female labour force participation in rural india: The demand side (pp. 55–71). Ideas for India.
18.
DeshpandeA., GoelD., & KhannaS. (2018). Bad karma or discrimination? Male–female wage gaps among salaried workers in India. World Development, 102, 331–344.
19.
DeshpandeA., & KabeerN. (2024). Norms that matter: Exploring the distribution of women’s work between income generation, expenditure-saving and unpaid domestic responsibilities in India. World Development, 174, 106435.
20.
DeshpandeA., & SinghJ. (2021). Dropping out, being pushed out or can’t get in? Decoding declining labour force participation of Indian women. IZA Institute of Labor Economics.
21.
DubeyA., OlsenW., & SenK. (2017). The decline in the labour force participation of rural women in India: Taking a long-run view. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 60(4), 589–612.
22.
Esteve-VolartB. (2004). Gender discrimination and growth: Theory and evidence from India. LSE STICERD Research Paper No. DEDPS42.
23.
FieldE., PandeR., RigolN., SchanerS., & MooreC. T. (2016). An account of one’s own: Can targeting benefits payments address social constraints to female labor force participation?. Policy Brief. Growth and Labour Markets in Low Income Countries Programme. https://glm-lic.iza.org/wpcontent/uploads/2017/12/GLMLIC-Policy-Brief_018.pdf
24.
FieldE., PandeR., & RigolN. (2021). On her account: Can strengthening women’s financial control boost female labor supply?American Economic Review, 111(7), 2342–2375.
25.
FletcherE., PandeR., & MooreC. M. T. (2017). Women and work in India: Descriptive evidence and a review of potential policies. Harvard Kennedy School.
26.
FleurbaeyM. (2009). Beyond GDP: The quest for a measure of social welfare. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(4), 1029–1075.
27.
GoldinC. (1994). The U-shaped female labor force function in economic development and economic history. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series (No. 4707).
28.
GoldinC. (2006). The quiet revolution that transformed women’s employment, education, and family. American Economic Review, 96(2), 1–21.
29.
GoldinC. (2021). Career and family: Women’s century-long journey toward equity. Princeton University Press.
30.
GuptaS. (2022). Labor market response to gendered breadwinner norms: Evidence from India. Word Bank.
31.
HirwayI. (2015). Unpaid work and the economy: Linkages and their implications. Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 58(1), 1–21.
32.
JayachandranS. (2020). Social norms as a barrier to women’s employment in developing countries(p. w27449). National Bureau of Economic Research.
33.
JensenR. (2012). Do labor market opportunities affect young women’s work and family decisions? Experimental evidence from India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(2), 753–792.
34.
KatzM. B., SternM. J., & FaderJ. J. (2005). Women and the paradox of economic inequality in the twentieth-century. Journal of Social History, 39(1), 65–88.
35.
KlasenS., & PietersJ. (2015). What explains the stagnation of female labor force participation in urban India?The World Bank Economic Review, 29(3), 449–478.
36.
LoichingerE., & ChengY. A. (2018). Feminising the workforce in ageing East Asia? The potential of skilled female labour in four advanced economies. Journal of Population Research, 35(2), 187–215.
37.
MondalB., GhoshJ., ChakrabortyS., & MitraS. (2018). Women workers in India: Labour force trends, occupational diversification and wage gaps. Azim Premji University.
38.
NeffD., SenK., & KlingV. (2012). The puzzling decline in rural women’s labor force participation in India: A re-examination[GIGA working paper 196]. GIGA.
39.
NordholtE. S. (1998). Imputation: Methods, simulation experiments and practical examples. International Statistical Review, 66(2), 157–180.
40.
PietersJ., & KlasenS. (2011). Drivers of female labour force participation in urban India during India’s Economic Boom. German Economic Association.
41.
PoddarS., & MukhopadhyayI. (2019). Gender wage gap: Some recent evidences from India. Journal of Quantitative Economics, 17, 121–151.
42.
PrillamanS. A., PandeR., SinghV., & MooreC. T. (2017). What constrains young Indian women’s labor force participation? Evidence from a survey of vocational trainees. EPoD, Harvard Kennedy School, Working Paper. https://epod.cid.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/inlinefiles/pandeprillamanmooresingh_skillspolicybrief.pdf
43.
RajuS. (1982). Regional patterns of female participation in the labor force of urban India. The Professional Geographer, 34(1), 42–49.
44.
RaniU., & UnniJ. (2009). Do economic reforms influence home-based work? Evidence from India. Feminist Economics, 15(3), 191–225.
45.
ReidM. G. (1947). The economic contribution of homemakers. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 251(1), 61–69.
46.
SahuD. (2024). Gender conundrum and unpaid work in India: Empirical evidence from India’s first large-scale time use survey. The Indian Economic Journal, 72(4), 711–727.
47.
SanghiS., SrijaA., & VijayS. S. (2015). Decline in rural female labour force participation in India: A relook into the causes. Vikalpa, 40(3), 255–268.
48.
SenguptaA., & DasP. (2014). Gender wage discrimination across social and religious groups in India: Estimates with unit level data. Economic & Political Weekly, 49, 71–76.
49.
SethP., & ChakravarthyR. (2023). Will Karnataka’s ‘Koosina Mane’ be a game changer for women in the rural workforce?https://justjobsnetwork.org/data-story/will-karnatakas- koosina-mane-be-a-game-changer-for-women-in-the-rural-workforce/
50.
SorsaP., MaresJ.DidierM., & GuimaraesC. (2015). Determinants of the low female labour force participation in India. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, (No. 1207), OECD Publishing, Paris.
51.
StiglitzJ. E., & YusufS.(Eds.) (2001). Rethinking the East Asian miracle. World Bank Publications.
52.
YoonJ. (2015). Labor market outcomes for women in East Asia. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 21(4), 384–408.
53.
YoungA. (1995). The tyranny of numbers: Confronting the statistical realities of the East Asian growth experience. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 641–680.
