This study investigates the total factor productivity (TFP) growth among urban cooperative banks in India during 2014–2020. The measurement of productivity is done using the data envelopment analysis-based Malmquist productivity index. We use two different models, viz., the intermediation approach and the production approach, to see how productivity estimates vary with the change in inputs and outputs. Our results show a large asymmetry in productivity estimates both among banks and over time. TFP estimates were consistently higher under the production approach vis-à-vis the intermediation approach. Further, the empirical results show that productivity gains were mainly determined by technological progress rather than efficiency improvements. Thus, collaborations in technological know-how can be beneficial to productivity growth.
AtaullahA., & LeH. (2006). Economic reforms and bank efficiency in developing countries: The case of the Indian banking industry. Applied Financial Economics, 16(9), 653–663.
2.
BankerR. D., ChangH., & LeeS. Y. (2010). Differential impact of Korean banking system reforms on bank productivity. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(7), 1450–1460.
3.
BankerR. D., CharnesA., & CooperW. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092.
4.
BarraC., DestefanisS., & LavaderaG. L. (2013). Regulation and the crisis: The efficiency of Italian cooperative banks. Centre for studies in economics and finance, working paper, 338.
5.
BarrosC. P., PeypochN., & WilliamsJ. (2010). A note on productivity change in European cooperative banks: The Luenberger indicator approach. International Review of Applied Economics, 24(2), 137–147.
6.
BergerA. N., & HumphreyD. B. (1997). Efficiency of financial institutions: International survey and directions for future research. European Journal of Operational Research, 98(2), 175–212.
7.
BhattacharyyaA., LovellC. A. K., & SahayP. (1997). The impact of liberalization on the productive efficiency of Indian commercial banks. European Journal of Operational Research, 98(2), 332–345.
8.
CasuB., & GirardoneC. (2006). Bank competition, concentration and efficiency in the single European market. Manchester School, 74(4), 441–468.
9.
CasuB., FerrariA., & ZhaoT. (2013). Regulatory reform and productivity change in Indian banking. Review of Economics & Statistics, 95(3), 1066–1077.
10.
CharnesA., CooperW. W., & RhodesE. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.
11.
CoccoreseP., & FerriG. (2020). Are mergers among cooperative banks worth a dime? Evidence on efficiency effects of M&As in Italy. Economic Modelling, 84, 147–164.
12.
CoelliT. (1996). A guide to DEAP version 2.1: A data envelopment analysis (computer) program. Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, University of New England, Australia, 96(08), 1–49.
13.
DasA., & GhoshS. (2006). Financial deregulation and efficiency: An empirical analysis of Indian banks during the post reform period. Review of Financial Economics, 15(3), 193–221.
14.
DasA., & GhoshS. (2009). Financial deregulation and profit efficiency: A nonparametric analysis of Indian banks. Journal of Economics and Business, 61(6), 509–528.
15.
Degl’InnocentiM., GrantK., ŠevićA., & TzeremesN. G. (2018). Financial stability, competitiveness and banks’ innovation capacity: Evidence from the global financial crisis. International Review of Financial Analysis, 59, 35–46.
16.
Degl’InnocentiM., KourtzidisS. A., SevicZ., & TzeremesN. G. (2017). Bank productivity growth and convergence in the European Union during the financial crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 75, 184–199.
17.
DoumposM., & ZopounidisC. (2013). Efficiency and performance evaluation of European cooperative banks. In Efficiency and productivity growth: Modelling in the financial services industry, pp. 237–252. West Sussex UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
18.
FäreR., GrosskopfS., LindgrenB., & RoosP. (1992). Productivity changes in Swedish pharamacies 1980–1989: A non-parametric Malmquist approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3(1–2), 85–101.
19.
FäreR., GrosskopfS., NorrisM., & ZhangZ. (1994). Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. American Economic Review, 66–83.
20.
FiordelisiF., & MareD. S. (2013). Probability of default and efficiency in cooperative banking. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 26, 30–45.
21.
FukuyamaH., & MatousekR. (2017). Modelling bank performance: A network DEA approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 256, 721–732.
22.
FukuyamaH., & MatousekR. (2018). Nerlovian revenue inefficiency in a bank production context: Evidence from Shinkin banks. European Journal of Operational Research, 271, 317–330.
23.
GauravS., & KrishnanJ. (2017). How efficient are India’s cooperative banks? Evidence from DCCBs. Economic & Political Weekly, 52(12), 115–124.
24.
GhoshS., & AnsariJ. (2018). Board characteristics and financial performance: Evidence from Indian cooperative banks. Journal of Co-Operative Organization and Management, 6(2), 86–93.
25.
GilbertR. A., & WilsonP. W. (1998). Effects of deregulation on the productivity of Korean banks. Journal of Economics and Business, 50(2), 133–155.
26.
GlassJ. C., McKillopD. G., QuinnB., & WilsonJ. (2014). Cooperative bank efficiency in Japan: A parametric distance function analysis. European Journal of Finance, 20(3), 291–317.
27.
GulatiR., & KumarS. (2011). Impact of non-traditional activities on the efficiency of Indian banks: An empirical investigation. Macroeconomics and Finance in Emerging Market Economies, 4(1), 125–166.
28.
HosonoK., SakaiK., & TsuruK. (2006). Consolidation of cooperative banks (Shinkin) in Japan: Motives and consequences. Discussion papers, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
29.
HsiaoH. C., ChangH., CianciA. M., & HuangL. H. (2010). First financial restructuring and operating efficiency: Evidence from Taiwanese commercial banks. Journal of Banking and Finance, 34(7), 1461–1471.
30.
IsikI., & HassanM. K. (2003). Financial deregulation and total factor productivity change: An empirical study of Turkish commercial banks. Journal of Banking and Finance, 27(8), 1455–1485.
31.
KevorkI. S., KolliasC., TzeremesP., & TzeremesN. G. (2018). European financial crisis and bank productivity: Evidence from Eastern European Countries. Applied Economics Letters, 25(4), 283–289.
32.
KontolaimouA., & TsekourasK. (2010). Are cooperatives the weakest link in European banking? A non-parametric metafrontier approach. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(8), 1946–1957.
33.
KumarS., & GulatiR. (2009). Did efficiency of Indian public sector banks converge with banking reforms?International Review of Economics, 56, 47–84.
34.
LalT. (2018). Impact of financial inclusion on poverty alleviation through cooperative banks. International Journal of Social Economics, 45(5), 808–828.
35.
LangG., & WelzelP. (1996). Efficiency and technical progress in banking Empirical results for a panel of German cooperative banks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 20(6), 1003–1023.
36.
MallickS., RughooA., TzeremesN. G., & XuW. (2020). Technological change and catching-up in the Indian banking sector: A time-dependent nonparametric frontier approach. Computational Economics, 56, 217–237.
37.
MohanT. R., & RayS. C. (2004). Comparing performance of public and private sector banks: a revenue maximisation efficiency approach. Economic & Political Weekly, 1271–1276.
38.
MolyneuxP., & WilliamsJ. (2005). The productivity of European co-operative banks. Managerial Finance, 31(11), 26–35.
39.
MukherjeeK., RayS. C., & MillerS. M. (2001). Productivity growth in large US commercial banks: The initial post-deregulation experience. Journal of Banking & Finance, 25(5), 913–939.
40.
NayakR. K. (2012). Financial inclusion through cooperative banks: A feasible option for inclusive growth. Indore Management Journal, 4(3), 9–17.
41.
PasiourasF., & SifodaskalakisE. (2010). Total factor productivity change of Greek cooperative banks. Managerial Finance, 36(4), 337–353.
42.
RajuS. (2018). Assessing the efficiency of urban co-operative banks in India. The Central European Review of Economics & Management, 2(1), 11–25.
43.
RayS. C., & DasA. (2010). Distribution of cost and profit efficiency: Evidence from Indian banking. European Journal of Operational Research, 201(1), 297–307.
44.
RBI. (2021). Report on trend and progress of banking in India 2019–-20. https://rbidocs.rbi.org.in/rdocs/Publications/PDFs/81450.pdf
45.
SarkarJ., SarkarS., & BhaumikS. K. (1998). Does ownership always matter?—Evidence from the Indian banking industry. Journal of Comparative Economics, 26(2), 262–281.
46.
ShermanH. D., & GoldF. (1985). Bank branch operating efficiency: Evaluation with data envelopment analysis. Journal of Banking and Finance, 9(2), 297–315.
47.
SturmJ. E., & WilliamsB. (2004). Foreign bank entry, deregulation and bank efficiency: Lessons from the Australian experience. Journal of Banking & Finance, 28(7), 1775–1799.
48.
SufianF. (2016). Determinants of efficiency in the Malaysian banking sector: Evidence from semi-parametric data envelopment analysis method. Studies in Microeconomics, 4(2), 151–172.
49.
TzeremesN. G. (2015). Efficiency dynamics in Indian banking: A conditional directional distance approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 240(3), 807–818.
50.
ZamanA. U., & KhanN. A. (2023). Decomposition of productivity growth among the cooperative banks in Jammu and Kashmir (India). Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–8.
51.
ZamanA. U., ZamanM. S., & KhanN. A. (2022). Analysing the technical efficiency of rural cooperative banks in India. Asian Economics Letters, 3(4), 1–6.
52.
ZamanM. S., & BhandariA. K. (2020). Financial deregulation, competition and cost efficiency of Indian commercial banks: Is there any convergence?Indian Economic Review, 55(2), 283–312.
53.
ZamanM. S., ValiyattoorV. (2022). Testing the appositeness of off-balance sheet activities in the Indian banking industry: A panel double bootstrap approach. Asian Economics Letters, 3. https://doi.org/10.46557/001c.37194
54.
ZhaoT., CasuB., & FerrariA. (2008). Deregulation and productivity growth: A study of the Indian commercial banking industry. International Journal of Business Performance Management, 10(4), 318–343.
55.
ZhaoT., CasuB., & FerrariA. (2010). The impact of regulatory reforms on cost structure, ownership and competition in Indian banking. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(1), 246–254.
