This paper aims to analyse the vulnerability to multidimensional poverty in Tunisia using a dual cut-off identification method and the fuzzy sets approach to estimate the degree of resilience for each household identified vulnerable. The results obtained allowed us to understand the sources of vulnerability in the different Tunisian regions. There is clear evidence that the number of vulnerable households grows as the degree of vulnerability increases and the size of vulnerable groups depends on the source of deprivation. Individuals with a high degree of membership are in a state of extreme vulnerability, and their abilities to cope with shock effects are low; they are exposed to the risk of experiencing poverty in the future. Preventive policies must consider their situations in order to eradicate poverty in all its forms and dimensions.
AbrahamR. A., & KumarK. K. (2008). Multidimensional poverty and vulnerability. Economic and Political Weekly, 43(20), 77–87.
2.
AdgerW. N., & KellyM. (1999). Social vulnerability to climate change and the architecture of entitlements. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 4(3), 253–266.
3.
AlkireS., & FosterJ. (2011). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 476–487.
4.
AlkireS., FosterJ., SethS., SantosM. E., RocheJ. M., & BallonP. (2015). Multidimensional poverty measurement and analysis. Oxford University Press.
5.
AlwangJ., SiegelP., & JorgensenS. L. (2001). Vulnerability: A view from different disciplines (SP Discussion Paper No. 115). Social Protection Unit, World Bank, Washington, DC, 42 pp. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/636921468765021121/pdf/multi0page.pdf
6.
AyadiM., El LahgaA., & ChtiouiN. (2007). Poverty and inequality in Tunisia: A non-monetary approach (PMMA Working Paper No. 2007-05). https://ssrn.com/abstract=985372
7.
BelhadjB. (2011). New fuzzy poverty index by distinguishing three levels of poverty. Research in Economics, 65(3), 221–231.
8.
BelhadjB. (2012). New weighting scheme for the dimensions in multidimensional poverty indices. Economics Letters, 116(3), 304–307.
9.
BelhadjB., & LimamM. (2012). Unidimensional and multidimensional fuzzy poverty measures: New approach. Economic Modelling, 29(4), 995–1002.
10.
BelhadjB., & MatoussiM. S. (2010). Poverty in Tunisia: A fuzzy measurement approach. Swiss Journal of Economic and Statistics, 146(2), 431–450.
11.
BettiG., & VermaV. (2008). Fuzzy measures of the incidence of relative poverty and deprivation: A multi-dimensional perspective. Statistical Methods and Applications, 17(2), 225–250.
12.
BohleH.-G., DowningT. E., & WattsM. J. (1994). Climate change and social vulnerability: Toward a sociology and geography of food insecurity. Global Environmental Change, 4(1), 37–48.
13.
CafieroC., & VakisR. (2006). Risk and vulnerability considerations in poverty analysis: Recent advances and future directions (Social Protection Discussion Paper No. 0610). The World Bank. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.501.5426&rep=rep1&type=pdf
14.
CalvoC., & DerconS. (2005). Measuring individual vulnerability (Working Paper Series No. 229). Department of Economics, Oxford University.
15.
CerioliA., & ZaniS. (1990). A fuzzy approach to the measurement of poverty. InDagumC. & ZengaM.(Eds.), Income and wealth distribution, inequality and poverty (pp. 272–284). Springer.
ChaudhuriS., JalanJ., & SuryahadiA. (2002). Assessing household vulnerability to poverty: A methodology and estimates for Indonesia (Discussion Paper No. 0102-52). Department of Economics New York, Columbia University.
18.
CheliB., & LemmiA. (1995). A ‘totally’ fuzzy and relative approach to the multidimensional analysis of poverty. Economic Notes, 24(1), 115–134.
19.
Chiappero-MartinettiE. (2008). Complexity and vagueness in the capability approach: Strengths or weaknesses?InComimF., QizilbashM., & AlkireS.(Eds.), The capability approach: Concepts, applications and measurement (pp. 268–309). Cambridge University Press.
20.
ChtiouiN., & AyadiM. (2013). A non-monetary multidimensional poverty analysis of Tunisia using generalized Sen-Shorrocks-Thon measures. InBérengerV. & BressonF.(Eds.), Poverty and social exclusion around the Mediterranean Sea. Springer.
21.
D’AmbrosioC., DeutschJ., & SilberJ. (2011). Multidimensional approaches to poverty measurement: An empirical analysis of poverty in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy and Spain, based on the European panel. Applied Economics, 43(8), 951–961.
22.
DeatonA. (1997). The analysis of household surveys: A micro econometric analysis for development policy (pp. 133–181). The World Bank, The Johns Hopkins University Press.
23.
HoddinottJ., & QuisumbingA. (2003). Methods for microeconometric risk and vulnerability assessments (Social Protection Discussion Paper No. 29138). The World Bank. https://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/hdnspu/29138.html
24.
KuziemkoI., BuellR. W., ReichT., & NortonM. I. (2014). ‘Last-place aversion’: Evidence and redistributive implications. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(1), 105–149.
25.
MoranE. F. (1990). The ecosystem approach in anthropology: From concept to practice. University of Michigan Press.
26.
NasriK. (2022). Poverty-alleviation programs in Tunisia: Selection processes and targeting performance indicators at the regional level. International Journal of Social Economics, 49(4), 629–650. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-03-2021-0157
27.
NasriK., & BelhadjB. (2017). Multidimensional poverty measurement in Tunisia: Distribution of deprivations across regions. The Journal of North African Studies, 22(5), 841–859. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629387.2017.1364631
28.
QizilbashM. (2002). A note on the measurement of poverty and vulnerability in the South African context. Journal of International Development, 14(6), 757–772.
29.
QizilbashM. (2003). Vague language and precise measurement: The case of poverty. Journal of Economic Methodology, 10(1), 41–58.
30.
SenA. (1981). Poverty and famines: An essays on entitlement and deprivation. Oxford University Press.
31.
SenA. (1992). Inequality reexamined. Cambridge University Press.
32.
SusmanP., OkeefeP., & WisnerB. (1983). Global disasters: A radical interpretation. InHewittK.(Ed.), Interpretation of calamity: From the view point of Human Ecology. Boston, Allen and Unwin Inc.
33.
ZadehL. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353.
