From an ownership viewpoint, we analyse the determinants of significant wage differences for India’s manufacturing sector. We use data from the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy’s Prowess database from 2000–2015. Using fixed-effects and Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition method, we confirm that foreign firms pay higher wages and salaries than domestic firms. Most importantly, productivity, participation in the export market, firm size, firm age and profit margin explain the inter-firm and intra-firm differences in labour intensity for the manufacturing firms in the Indian economy. The wage gap seems higher for intra-firm than the inter-firm, indicating that demand for labour is higher within the sector.
AitkenB., HarrisonA., & LipseyR. E. (1995). Wages and foreign ownership: A comparative study of Mexico, Venezuela and United States. Journal of International Economics, 40(3–4), 345–371.
2.
AlmeidaR. (2003). The effects of foreign owned firms on the labor market (Discussion Paper No. 785). IZA.
3.
BalsvikR. (2011). Is labor mobility a channel for spillovers from multinationals? Evidence from Norwegian manufacturing. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(1), 285–297.
4.
BangaR. (2005). Liberalisation and wage inequality in India (WP No. 156). Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations.
5.
BrownC., & MedoffJ. (1989). The employer size-wage effect. The Journal of Political Economy, 97(5), 1027–1059.
6.
ChibberP. K., & MajumdarS. (1999). Foreign ownership and profitability: Property rights, control and the performance of firms in Indian industry. The Journal of Law and Economics, 42(1), 209–238.
7.
FeenstraR. C., & HansonG. H. (1997). Foreign direct investment and relative wages: Evidence from Mexico’s maquiladoras. Journal of International Economics, 42(3–4), 371–393.
8.
FelicianoZ., & LipseyR. E. (2006). Foreign ownership, wages, and wage changes in U.S. industries, 1987–92. Contemporary Economic Policy, 24(1), 74–91.
9.
FriedmanJ., YévenesC., MulderN., FaúndezS., CaldenteyP. E., VelásquezM., BaizánF., & ReineckeG. (2012). Openness, wage gaps and unions in Chile: A Micro-Econometric Analysis. OECD Library (134), 37.
10.
GirmaS., & GorgH. (2003). Evaluating the causal effects of foreign acquisition on domestic skilled and unskilled wages (Discussion Paper No. 903). IZA.
11.
GoergH., StroblE., & WalshF. (2007). Why do foreign-owned firms pay more? The role of on-the-job training. Review of World Economics, 143(3), 464–482.
12.
JavorcikB. (2013). Does FDI bring good jobs to host countries?World Development Report.
13.
MarkusenJ. R., MollerN. M., & SchjerningB. (2013). Foreign firms, domestic wages. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 115(2), 292–325.
14.
MartinsP. S. (2004). Do foreign firms really pay higher wages? Evidence from different estimators (Discussion Paper No. 1388). IZA.
15.
MartinsP. S. (2008). Paying more to hire the best? Foreign firms, wages and worker mobility. Economic Inquiry, 49(2), 349–363.
16.
MitraA. (1999). Total factor productivity growth and technical efficiency in Indian industries. Economic and Political Weekly, 34(31), M98–M105.
17.
OgorevcM., & VerbicM. (2013). Ownership and wages: Spatial econometric approach. International Journal of Sustainable Economy, 5(2), 207–224.
18.
OreficeG., SlyN., & ToubalF. (2016). The multinational wage premium and wage dynamics (Working Paper No. 16–10). Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
19.
SasidharanS., & SNR. R. (2015). Impact of foreign trade on employment and wages in Indian manufacturing. South Asia Economic Journal, 16(2), 209–232.
20.
SjoholmF., & LipseyR. E. (2006). Foreign firms and Indonesian manufacturing wages: An analysis with panel data. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 55(1), 201–221.
