Marchiori and Warglien (2008, Science, 319(5866), 1111–1113) showed that a simple regret-driven neural network model outperforms almost all competing models when predicting human choice behaviour in games with ‘unique equilibrium in mixed strategies’. Considering its effectiveness in this class of games, we scale up the model to account for strategically more important decision-making scenarios like prisoners’ dilemma (PD). The modification is based on the assumption that the trajectory of behaviour observed in a repeated PD experiment is the result of the bidirectional attraction between pareto-optimal (mutual cooperation) versus self-interested defection (mutual defection) in repeated PD game. The simulation results significantly capture the qualitative trends in behaviour over time.
AxelrodR. (1980). Effective choice in the prisoner’s dilemmaJournal of Conflict Resolution24(1), 3–25.
2.
CamererC. F. (2003). Behavioral game theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
DevetagG.OrtmannA. (2007). When and why? A critical survey on coordination failure in the laboratory. Experimental Economics, 10(3), 331–344.
4.
ErevI.RothA. E. (1998). Predicting how people play games: Reinforcement learning in experimental games with unique, mixed strategy equilibria. American Economic Review, 848–881.
5.
ErevI.RothA. E. (2001). Simple reinforcement learning models and reciprocation in the prisoner’s dilemma game. In GigerenzerGSeltenR. (eds), Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox (pp. 215–231). Cambridge: MIT Press.
6.
FehrE.GoachterS. (2000). Cooperation and punishment public goods experiments. American Economic Review, 90(4), 980–994.
7.
GonzalezC.Ben-AsherN. (2014). Learning to cooperate in the prisoner’s dilemma: Robustness of predictions of an instance-based learning model. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci2014) (pp. 2287–2292). Retrieved from https://mindmodeling.org/cogsci2014/papers/398/paper398.pdf
8.
GonzalezC.Ben-AsherN.MartinJ. M.DuttV. (2015). A cognitive model of dynamic cooperation with varied interdependency information. Cognitive Science, 39(3), 457–495.
9.
HardinG. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248.
10.
HarsanyiJ. (1995). A new theory of equilibrium selection for games with complete information. Games and Economic Behavior, 8(1), 91–122.
HristovaE.GrinbergM. (2005). Information acquisition in the iterated prisoner’s dilemma game: An eye-tracking study. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 983–988). Retrieved from http://csjarchive.cogsci.rpi.edu/proceedings/2005/docs/p983.pdf
13.
KandoriM.MailathG. J.RobR. (1993). Learning, mutation, and long run equilibria in games. Econometrica, 61(1), 29–56.
14.
KimS. Y. (2012). A model of political information-processing and learning cooperation in the repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 24(1), 46–65.
15.
MarchioriD.WarglienM. (2008). Predicting human interactive learning by regret-driven neural networks. Science, 319(5866), 1111–1113.
16.
MartinJ. M.GonzalezC.JuvinaI.LebiereC. (2013). A description–experience gap in social interactions: Information about interdependence and its effects on cooperation. Journal of Behavioural Decision Making, 27(4), 349–362.
17.
NormannH. T.WallaceB. (2012). The impact of the termination rule on cooperation in a prisoner’s dilemma experiment. International Journal of Game Theory, 41(3), 707–718.
18.
O’NeillB. (1987). Nonmetric test of the minimax theory of two-person zero-sum games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 84(7), 2106–2109.
19.
OstromxE. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
RapoportA.MowshowitzA. (1966). Experimental studies of stochastic models for the prisoner’s dilemma. Behavioural Science, 11(6), 444–458.
21.
YoungO. (1993). The evolution of conventions. Econometrica, 61(1), 57–84.
