In an experiment, we evaluate whether prices of investment options influence choice in an ambiguous environment. We find that even with feedback on previous period’s investment, and repeated decision-making, prices do influence choice in our ambiguous environment. Modal behaviour is rational, that is, for each category of investment subjects choose the lowest available price. However, there is a tendency to associate high-priced ambiguous investment options with better quality. This effect becomes stronger as the price differences between available investment options become larger.
AlevyJ. E.LandryC. E.ListJ. A. (2015). Field Experiments on Anchoring of Economic Valuations. Economic Enquiry, 53(3), 1522–1538.
2.
ArielyD.LoewensteinG.PrelecD. (2003). ‘Coherent arbitrariness’: Stable demand curves without stable preferences. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 73–106.
3.
ArielyD.LoewensteinG.PrelecD.. (2006). Tom Sawyer and the construction of value. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 60(1), 1–10.
4.
ArrowK.HurwiczL. (1972). An optimality criterion for decision making under ignorance. In C. Carter, J. Ford (Eds), Uncertainty and expectations in economics (pp. 1–11). Oxford: B. Blackwell.
5.
CamererC.WeberM. (1992). Recent developments in modeling preferences: Uncertainty and ambiguity. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 325–370.
6.
CharnessG.KarniE.LevinD. (2013). Ambiguity attitudes and social interactions: An experimental investigation. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 46(1), 1–25.
7.
CharnessG.MascletD.VillevalM. C. (2011). Competitive preferences and status as an incentive: Experimental evidence. Working Paper.
8.
ChewS. H.EbsteinR. P.ZhongS. (2011). Ambiguity aversion and familiarity bias: Evidence from behavioral and gene association studies. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 44(1), 1–18.
9.
ChowC. C.SarinR. K. (2001). Comparative Ignorance and the Ellsberg Paradox. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 22(2), 129–139.
10.
EllsbergD. (1961). Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75(4), 643–669.
11.
EtnerJ.JelevaM.TallonJ. M. (2012). Decision theory under ambiguity. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26(2), 234–270.
FoxC.TverskyA. (1995). Ambiguity aversion and comparative ignorance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 585–603.
14.
FrankR. H. (1985). The demand for unobservable and other nonpositional goods. American Economic Review, 75(1), 101–116.
15.
FréchetteG. R.SchotterA. & TreviñoI. (2014). Personality and Choice in Risky and Ambiguous Environments : An Experimental Study.Working Paper.
16.
GuptaG. R. (1976). Love, arranged marriage, and the Indian social structure. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 7(1), 75–85.
17.
HalevyY. (2007). Ellsberg revisited: An experimental study. Econometrica, 75(2), 503–536.
18.
HeathC.TverskyA. (1991). Preference and belief: Ambiguity and competence in choice under uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 4(1), 5–28.
19.
HogarthR. M.KunreutherH. (1995). Decision making under ignorance: Arguing with yourself. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 10(1), 15–36.
20.
KalmanP. J. (1968). Theory of consumer behavior when prices enter the utility function. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 36(3), 497–510.
21.
KerenG.GerritsenL. E. M. (1999). On the robustness and possible accounts of ambiguity aversion. Acta Psychologica, 103(1–2), 149–172.
22.
KnightF. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Boston: Houghton Mifllin.
23.
LiuH.H.ColmanA. M. (2009). Ambiguity aversion in the long run: Repeated decisions under risk and uncertainty. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(3), 277–284.
24.
MeyerJ. J. (1953). Sexual life in ancient India. New York: Barnes &Noble.
25.
MorenoO.RosokhaY. (2013). Learning under compound risk vs. Learning under ambiguity: An experiment. Working Paper.
26.
PollakR. A. (1977). Price dependent preferences. American Economic Review, 67(2), 64–75.
27.
RothA. E. (1987). Laboratory experimentation in economics. Truman Bewley (Ed.), Advances in economic theory, Fifth World Congress (pp. 269–299). New York: Cambridge University Press.
28.
RothA. E.. (1988). Laboratory Experimentation in Economics. The Economic Journal, 98(393), 974–1031.
29.
ScitovszkyT. (1944). Some consequences of the habit of judging quality by rpice. Review of Economic Studies, 12(2), 100–105.
30.
SmithV. L. (1994). Economics in the laboratory. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 113–131.
31.
VeblenT. (1899). The Theory of Leisure Class.NY: Modern Library.
32.
WooldridgeJ. M. (2003). Cluster-sample methods in applied econometrics. American Economic Review, 93(2), 133–138.
