This study aims to examine some ‘circumstances’ that may influence trust formation and, in general, pro-social behaviours in game situations characterized by complex strategies, that is, not dichotomous choices. We consider the potential role played by one-way communication (cheap talk), social history, and ‘climate effects’ induced by meditation in a single experiment based on the investment game. Our main findings are that meditation enhances trust formation, while social history and cheap talk have limited or no effect on it—at least on average.
BallietD.Van LangeP. A. M. (2013). Trust, conflict and cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 139(5), 1090–1112.
2.
BaltussenG.PostG. T.van den AssemM. J.WakkerP. P. (2012). Random incentive systems in a dynamic choice experiment. Experimental Economics, 15(3), 418–443.
3.
BardsleyN.CubittR.LoomesG.MoffattP.StarmerC.SugdenR. (2010). Experimental economics: Rethinking the rules.Princeton: Princeton University Press.
4.
BeattieJ.LoomesG. (1997). The impact of incentives upon risky choice experiments. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14(2), 155–168.
5.
Ben-NerA.PuttermanL. (2009). Trust, communication and contracts: An experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 70(1), 106–121.
6.
Ben-NerA.PuttermanL.RenT. (2011). Lavish returns on cheap talk: Non-binding communication in a trust experiment. Journal of Socio-Economics, 40(1), 1–13.
7.
BergJ.DickhautJ.McCabeK. (1995). Trust, reciprocity and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 122–142.
8.
BrachtJ.FeltovichN. (2009). Whatever you say, your reputation precedes you: Observation and cheap talk in the trust game. Journal of Public Economics, 93(9), 1036–1044.
9.
CahnB. R.PolichJ. (2006). Meditation states and traits: EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies. Psychological Bulletin the American Psychological Association, 132(2), 180–211.
10.
CharnessG.DufwenbergM. (2006). Promises and partnership. Econometrica, 74(6), 1579–1601.
11.
CharnessG.DufwenbergM.. (2010). Bare promises: An experiment. Economics Letters, 107(2), 281–283.
12.
ColemanJ. (1990). Foundations of social choice theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
CooperD.KagelJ. H. (2009). Other regarding preferences: A selective survey of experimental results. In J.H. Kagel, A. Roth (eds), Handbook of Experimental Economics, 2 (Forthcoming). Princeton University Press.
14.
CoricelliG.MoralesL. G.MahlstedtA. (2006). The investment game with asymmetric information. Metroeconomica, 57(1), 13–30.
15.
CoxJ. C. (2009). Trust and reciprocity: Implications of game triads and social contexts. New Zealand Economic Papers, Laboratory Experiments in Economics, Finance and Political Science, 43(Special Issue), 89–104.
16.
CoxJ. C.. (2004). How to identify trust and reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior, 46(2), 260–281.
CoxJ. C.SadirajV.SchmidtU. (2014). Paradoxes and mechanisms for choice under risk. Experimental Economics, 18(2), 215–250.
19.
CubittR. P.StarmerC.SugdenR. (1998). On the validity of the random lottery incentive system. Experimental Economics, 1(2), 115–131.
20.
Di BartolomeoG.PapaS. (2016). Trust and reciprocity: Extensions and robustness of triadic design. Experimental Economics, 19(1), 100–115.
21.
DingX.TangY. Y.TangR.PosnerM. I. (2014). Improving creativity performance by short-term meditation. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 10(9), 1–8.
22.
EllingsenT.JohannessonM. (2004). Promises, threats and fairness. Economic Journal, 114(495), 397–420.
23.
FarbN. A.SegalZ. V.MaybergH.BeanJ.McKeonD.FatimaZ.AndersonA. K. (2007). Attending to the present: Mindfulness meditation reveals distinct neural modes of self-reference, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2(4), 313–322.
GotheN.PontifexM.B.HillmanC.McAuleyE. (2013). The acute effects of yoga on executive function. Journal of physical activity and health, 10(4), 488–95.
26.
JayaramN.VaramballyS.BehereR. V.VenkatasubramanianG.ArasappaR.ChristopherR.GangadharB. N. (2013). Effect of yoga therapy on plasma oxytocin and facial emotion recognition deficits in patients of schizophrenia. Indian Journal Psychiatry, 55(7), 409–413.
27.
JohnsonN. D.MislinA. A. (2011). Trust games: A meta-analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(5), 805–889.
28.
KirkU.DownarJ.MontagueP. R. (2011). Interoception drives increased rational decision-making in meditators playing the ultimatum game. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 5(art. 49), 1–11.
29.
Kok SuiC. (2005). SuperBrain yoga. Manila: Institute for Inner Studies Publishing Foundation.
SonnemansJ.OffermanT. (2001). Is the quadratic scoring rule really incentive compatible?Working Paper, CREED, University of Amsterdam.
32.
StarmerC.SugdenR. (1991). Does the random-lottery incentive system elicit true preferences? An experimental investigation. American Economic Review, 81(4), 971–978.
33.
TangY. Y.MaY.WangJ.FanY.FengaH.WangaJ. …Fan M. (2009). Short-term meditation training improves attention and self-regulation, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of United States, 106, 8865–8870.
34.
TangY. Y.MaY.WangJ.FanY.FengS.LuQ. …PosnerM.I. (2007). Short-term meditation training improves attention and self-regulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of United States, 104(43), 17152–17156.
35.
ThomasJ. W.CohenM. (2014). A methodological review of meditation research, Frontiers in Psychiatry, 5, 74.
36.
YoganandaP. (1938). Om chant. Los Angeles: Self-Realization Fellowship.
37.
YoganandaP.. (1958). Scientific healing affirmations. Los Angeles: Self-Realization Fellowship.
