A recent study in the area of international trade networks found that global free trade (GFT) is pairwise stable. This finding has led to the conclusion that bilateralism is a building block for GFT. The current article uses an alternative stability concept to show that international networks other than GFT are the only stable networks when governments are politically biased. The main implication of this finding is that the use of bilateral agreements as a political tool to reach GFT can in fact lead to inefficient stable networks.
BagwellK.StaigerR.W. (2002). The economics of the world trading system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
BaldwinR. (1987). Politically realistic objective functions and the trade policy PROFs and tariffs. Economic Letters, 24(3), 287–290.
3.
BlochF.JacksonM.O. (2006). Definitions of equilibrium in network formation games. International Journal of Game Theory, 34(3), 305–318.
4.
ConfortiP.SalvaticiL. (2004). Agricultural trade liberalization in the Doha round. Alternative scenarios and strategic interactions between developed and developing countries. FAO Commodity and Trade Policy Research Working Paper No. 10.
5.
EstevadeordalA.SuominenK. (2004). Rules of origin: A world map and trade effects. Paper prepared for the Seventh Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis: Trade, Poverty, and the Environment. The World Bank, Washington, DC.
6.
FulponiL.ShearerM.AlmeidaJ. (2011). Regional trade agreements—Treatment of agriculture. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Working Papers No. 44, OECD Publishing.
7.
FurusawaT.KonishiH. (2005). Free trade networks with transfers. Japanese Economic Review, 56(2), 144–164.
8.
FurusawaT.KonishiH. (2007). Free trade networks. Journal of International Economics, 72(2), 310–335.
9.
GillesR.P.SarangiS. (2004a). Social network formation with consent. CentER Discussion Paper, No. 2004-70.
10.
GillesR.P.SarangiS. (2004b). The role of trust in costly network formation. Mimeo. Virginia Tech.
11.
GillesR.P.SarangiS. (2005). Stable networks and convex payoffs. CentER Discussion Paper No. 005–84.
12.
GillesR.P.ChakrabartiS.SarangiS.BadasyanN. (2006). Critical agents in networks. Mathematical Social Sciences, 52(3), 302–310.
13.
GoyalS.JoshiS. (2006). Bilateralism and free trade. International Economic Review, 47(3), 749–778.
14.
JacksonM.WolinskyA. (1996). A strategic model of social and economic networks. Journal of Economic Theory, 71(1), 44–74.
15.
JamesW.E. (2006). Rules of origin in emerging Asia-Pacific Preferential Trade Agreements: Will PTAs promote trade and development? Asia-Pacific Research and Training Network on Trade Working Paper Series, No. 19.
16.
MayD.E. (2008). Is bilateralism consistent with global free trade?International Journal of Business and Economics, 7(2), 137–152.
