This study aimed to validate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of a developed AI model against a periodontist, using an expert periodontist as the gold standard. The goal was to evaluate the AI’s potential as a scalable triage tool for periodontal diagnosis in clinical settings.
Materials and Methods:
The AI model, developed from 2,000 panoramic radiographs, was clinically implemented using 300 anonymized images from the SIDEXIS program. It quantified alveolar bone loss to stage periodontitis, with diagnostic performance compared to a periodontist using expert evaluation as the reference.
Results:
The expert periodontist classified the cases as follows: 3.3% non-periodontitis, 10.3% stage I, 47.0% Stage II, 38.7% stage III, and 0.7% stage IV. The AI model demonstrated a higher overall consistency rate with the expert (71.7%) compared to the periodontist (62.7%). This superior performance was particularly notable in stage II (AI: 40% vs. periodontist: 28%) and stage III (AI: 29% vs. periodontist: 27%) classifications. The level of agreement with the expert, measured by Cohen’s κ, was moderate and similar for both the periodontist (κ = 0.530) and the AI model (κ = 0.497). The AI model exhibited significantly higher accuracy (97% vs. 87.3%) and perfect sensitivity (100% vs. 88.3%) but considerably lower specificity (10% vs. 60%) compared to the periodontist.
Conclusions:
The findings indicate AI’s strong potential as a scalable triage tool to democratize periodontal care, delivering high diagnostic accuracy. With further refinement to improve specificity, such models could ensure equitable access to early intervention, overcoming geographic and socioeconomic barriers.
PapapanouPN, SanzM, BuduneliN, . Periodontitis: consensus report of workgroup 2 of the 2017 world workshop on the classification of periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions. J Periodontol, 2018; 89(Suppl 1): S173–S182.
2.
WuCZ, YuanYH, LiuHH, . Epidemiologic relationship between periodontitis and type 2 diabetes mellitus. BMC Oral Health, 2020; 20(1): 204.
3.
EkePI, DyeBA, WeiL,. Prevalence of periodontitis in adults in the United States: 2009 and 2010. J Dent Res, 2012; 91(10): 914–920.
4.
TadjoedinFM. The correlation between age and periodontal diseases. J Int Dent Med Res, 2017; 10(2): 327.
5.
NazirM, Al-AnsariA, Al-KhalifaK, . Global prevalence of periodontal disease and lack of its surveillance. Sci World J, 2020; 2146160.
6.
JeffcoatMK, JeffcoatRL, GladowskiPA, . Impact of periodontal therapy on general health: Evidence from insurance data for five systemic conditions. Am J Prev Med, 2014; 47(2): 166–174.
7.
BayatF, VehkalahtiMM, ZafarmandAH, . Impact of insurance scheme on adults’ dental check-ups in a developing oral health care system. Eur J Dent, 2008; 2(2): 3–10.
8.
KiyakHA, and ReichmuthM.Barriers to and enablers of older adults’ use of dental services. J Dent Educ, 2005; 69(9): 975–986.
9.
TonettiMS, BottenbergP, ConradsG, . Dental caries and periodontal diseases in the ageing population: Call to action to protect and enhance oral health and well-being as an essential component of healthy ageing: consensus report of group 4 of the joint EFP/ORCA workshop on the boundaries. J Clin Periodontol, 2017; 44(18): S135–S144.
10.
Bureau of Dental Health, Department of Health. The 9th National Oral Health Survey (2022–2023): Assessing oral health status, behaviors, and key factors among the Thai population. National Oral Health Survey Report. 2023.
11.
TonettiMS, GreenwellH, and KornmanKS. Staging and grading of periodontitis: framework and proposal of a new classification and case definition. J Periodontol, 2018; 89: S159–S172.
12.
GencoRJ, and BorgnakkeWS. Risk factors for periodontal disease. Periodontol, 2013; 62(1): 59–94.
13.
PetersenPE, OgawaH. The global burden of periodontal disease: towards integration with chronic disease prevention and control. Periodontol, 2012; 60(1): 15–39.
14.
TopolEJ. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat Med, 2019; 25(1): 44–56.
15.
SchwendickeF, SamekW, and KroisJ.Artificial intelligence in dentistry: chances and challenges. J Dent Res, 2020; 99(7): 769–774.
16.
LeeJH, KimDH, JeongSN, . Diagnosis and prediction of periodontally compromised teeth using a deep learning-based convolutional neural network algorithm. J Periodontal Implant Sci, 2018; 48(6): 114–123.
17.
DingH, WuJ, ZhaoW, . Artificial intelligence in dentistry: a review. Front Dent Med, 2023; 4: 1085251.
18.
ChangHJ, LeeSJ, YongTH, . Deep learning hybrid method to automatically diagnose periodontal bone loss and stage periodontitis. Sci Rep, 2020; 10(1): 7531.
19.
JundaengJ, ChamchongR, and NithikathkulC.Advanced AI-assisted panoramic radiograph analysis for periodontal prognostication and alveolar bone loss detection. Front Dent Med, 2025; 5:1509361.
20.
JundaengJ, ChamchongR, and NithikathkulC.Artificial intelligence-powered innovations in periodontal diagnosis: A new era in dental healthcare. Front Med Technol, 2025; 6: 1469852.
21.
NgamjarusC, and PattanittumP. n4studies plus: application for sample-size calculation in health science research. Version 1.4. App store; 2024.
PolizziA, AlibrandiA, Lo GiudiceA, . Impact of periodontal microRNAs associated with alveolar bone remodeling during orthodontic tooth movement: a randomized clinical trial. J Transl Med, 2024; 22(1): 1155.
24.
IsolaG, PolizziA, SantagatiM, . Effect of nonsurgical mechanical debridement with or without chlorhexidine formulations in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis: a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2025; 36(5): 566–577.
25.
BullonP, NewmanHN, BattinoM. Obesity, diabetes mellitus, atherosclerosis and chronic periodontitis: A shared pathology via oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction?Periodontol, 2014; 64(1): 139–153.
26.
ShangJ, LiuH, ZhengY, . Role of oxidative stress in the relationship between periodontitis and systemic diseases. Front Physiol, 2023; 14: 1210449.
27.
LeeJH, KimDH, JeongSN, . Detection and diagnosis of dental caries using a deep learning-based convolutional neural network algorithm. J Dent, 2018; 74: 106–111.
28.
CharisisAS, GoulermasJY, SlaterC, . Machine learning for neural imaging in caries detection. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng, 2019; 27(2): 223–230.
29.
KroisJ, EkertT, MeinholdL, . Deep learning for the radiographic detection of periodontal bone loss. Sci Rep, 2019; 9: 8495.
LiZ, ZhangL, SunY, . Deep learning for detecting tooth fractures in dental radiographs. IEEE Access, 2020; 8: 34442–34452.
32.
CasalegnoF, NewtonT, MartignonS, . Performance of deep learning in detecting tooth fractures on intraoral images. J Clin Med, 2019; 8(10): 1540.
33.
MuraliK, RajaJ, RoyT, . Oral cancer detection using deep learning techniques. J Cancer Res Ther, 2016; 12(3): 1234–1239.
34.
KhanMA, AlhaisoniM, TariqU, . Deep learning-based identification of oral cancer on histopathological images. Comput Biol Med, 2021; 134: 104457.
35.
KimD, LeeJ, ChoiB, . Automated orthodontic treatment planning with SVM and KNN. Angle Orthod, 2018; 88(2): 245–252.
36.
BichuYM, HansaI, BichuAY, . Applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in orthodontics: a scoping review. Prog Orthod, 2021; 22(1): 18.
37.
LinPT, AbellaF, RoigM, . Predicting root canal treatment outcomes using machine learning algorithms. Int Endod J, 2020; 53(3): 353–362.
38.
AbellaF, PatelS, Duran-SindreuF, . Machine learning for endodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. J Endod, 2020; 46(7): 1039–1047.
39.
SchwendickeF, SamekW, and KroisJ.Artificial intelligence in implantology. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2019; 30(8): 710–720.
40.
KhanSF, SiddiqueA, KhanAM, . Artificial intelligence in periodontology and implantology: a narrative review. J Med Artif Intell, 2024; 7: 6.
41.
JundaengJ, NithikathkulC, and ChamchongR.Periodontitis diagnosis: A review of current and future trends in artificial intelligence. Technol Health Care, 2025; 33(1): 473–484.
42.
Uzun SaylanBC, BaydarO, YeşilovaE, . Assessing the effectiveness of artificial intelligence models for detecting alveolar bone loss in periodontal disease: a panoramic radiograph study. Diagnostics, 2023; 13: 1800.
43.
KongZ, OuyangH, CaoY, . Automated periodontitis bone loss diagnosis in panoramic radiographs using a bespoke two-stage detector. Comput Biol Med, 2023; 152: 106374.
44.
HungK, YeungAWK, TanakaR, . Current applications, opportunities, and limitations of AI for 3D imaging in dental research and practice. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020; 17(12): 4424.
45.
SchwendickeF, SinghT, LeeJH, . Artificial intelligence in dental research: checklist for authors, reviewers, readers. J Dent, 2021; 107: 103610.
46.
ZadrożnyL, RegulskiP, Brus-SawczukK, . Artificial intelligence application in assessment of panoramic radiographs. Diagnostics, 2022; 12: 224.
47.
JiangL, ChenD, CaoZ,. A two-stage deep learning architecture for radiographic staging of periodontal bone loss. BMC Oral Health, 2022; 22: 106.
48.
ThanathornwongB, and SuebnukarnS.Automatic detection of periodontal compromised teeth in digital panoramic radiographs using faster regional convolutional neural networks. Imaging Sci Dent, 2020; 50: 169–174.
