AdcockC. J. (1997). Sample size determination: A review. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 46(2), 261–283.
2.
Barragán-LandyM., SousaS., RomeroF., & LeãoC. (2020, June). A proposed representative sampling methodology. In 20th European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies: ECRM (p. 8).
3.
BectonJ. B., WalkerH. J., & Jones‐FarmerA. (2014). Generational differences in workplace behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44(3), 175–189.
4.
ChristieP. M. J., KwonI. W. G., StoeberlP. A., & BaumhartR. (2003). A cross-cultural comparison of ethical attitudes of business managers: India Korea and the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(3), 263–287.
5.
CloughertyJ. A., DusoT., & MuckJ. (2016). Correcting for self-selection based endogeneity in management research: Review, recommendations and simulations. Organizational Research Methods, 19(2), 286–347.
6.
CoppockA., LeeperT., & MullinixK. (2018). Generalizability of heterogeneous treatment effect estimates across samples. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115, 12441–12446.
7.
DegtiarI., & RoseS. (2023). A review of generalizability and transportability. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 10(1), 501–524.
8.
GuptaP., BhattacharyaS., NeelamN., & KunteM. (2016). Boomers like to confront, generation Y is okay with withdrawal, but they all love to negotiate in India. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 33(4), 403–435.
9.
GursoyD., MaierT. A., & ChiC. G. (2008). Generational differences: An examination of work values and generational gaps in the hospitality workforce. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 27(3), 448–458.
10.
Infante-RivardC., & CussonA. (2018). Reflection on modern methods: selection bias—a review of recent developments. International Journal of Epidemiology, 47(5), 1714–1722.
11.
JayaramJ., OkeA., & PrajogoD. (2014). The antecedents and consequences of product and process innovation strategy implementation in Australian manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Research, 52(15), 4424–4439.
12.
KimD. Y., & ParkS. (2020). Rethinking millennials: how are they shaping the tourism industry?Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 25(1), 1–2.
13.
KockF., BerbekovaA., & AssafA. G. (2021). Understanding and managing the threat of common method bias: Detection, prevention and control. Tourism Management, 86, 104330.
14.
MahmoudA. B., FuxmanL., MohrI., ReiselW. D., & GrigoriouN. (2021). “We aren’t your reincarnation!” Workplace motivation across X, Y and Z generations. International Journal of Manpower, 42(1), 193–209.
15.
MantokS., SekhonH., SahiG. K., & JonesP. (2019). Entrepreneurial orientation and the mediating role of organisational learning amongst Indian S-SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 26(5), 641–660.
16.
MeyerM., & MayrhoferW. (2022). Selecting a sample. In FlickU. (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research design: Volume 2 (pp. 273–289). Sage.
17.
NaongM., & MakhoaliK. (2024). Influence of selected demographic variables on SMME survival. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 13(6), 13–22.
18.
PalinkasL. A., HorwitzS. M., GreenC. A., WisdomJ. P., DuanN., & HoagwoodK. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544.
19.
PanditaD. (2022). Innovation in talent management practices: creating an innovative employer branding strategy to attract generation Z. International Journal of Innovation Science, 14(3–4), 556–569.
20.
ParryE., FarndaleE., BrewsterC., & MorleyM. J. (2021). Balancing rigour and relevance: The case for methodological pragmatism in conducting large‐scale, multi‐country and comparative management studies. British Journal of Management, 32(2), 273–282.
21.
PichlerS., KohliC., & GranitzN. (2021). DITTO for Gen Z: A framework for leveraging the uniqueness of the new generation. Business Horizons, 64(5), 599–610.
22.
QiB., LinJ., TianG., & LewisH. (2018). The impact of top management team characteristics on the choice of earnings management strategies: Evidence from China. Accounting Horizons, 32, 143–164.
23.
RobinsonR. S. (2014). Purposive sampling. In MichalosA. C. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 5243–5245). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2337
24.
SakdiyakornM., GolubovskayaM., & SolnetD. (2021). Understanding Generation Z through collective consciousness: Impacts for hospitality work and employment. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 94, 102822.
25.
ShethJ. N. (2011). Impact of emerging markets on marketing: Rethinking existing perspectives and practices. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 166–182.
StuartE. A., BradshawC. P., & LeafP. J. (2015). Assessing the generalizability of randomized trial results to target populations. Prevention Science, 16(3), 475–485.
28.
ThangavelP., PathakP., & ChandraB. (2021). Millennials and Generation Z: A generational cohort analysis of Indian consumers. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 28(7), 2157–2177.
29.
Van HauteE. (2021). Sampling techniques. In Research Methods in the Social Sciences: An AZ of Key Concepts (p. 247). Oxford University Press.
30.
VasanM. (2020). Moderating effect of demographic and business characteristics on performance of women owned small enterprises: Empirical evidence from India. Serbian Journal of Management, 15(2), 319–333.
31.
WatkinsH. J., & Omilion-HodgesL. M. (2025). Zooming in on Generational Differences: Exploring Intergenerational Employee Relationships and the Rise of Generation Z in the Workplace. International Journal of Business Communication. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884251345809
32.
WeemsG. H., OnwuegbuzieA. J., SchreiberJ. B., & EggersS. J. (2003). Characteristics of respondents who respond differently to positively and negatively worded items on rating scales. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(6), 587–606.