Because it affects the next generation, knowledge transfer is a crucial resource for succession in a family-owned business. This paper examines how knowledge transfer impacts family businesses in Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China. Data collection is done via semi-structured interviews, and data manipulation is done using data categorization and contextualization techniques. The findings show that: (i) the effect of knowledge transfers through the founder and beyond the family business results in a large amount of tacit knowledge in family businesses, whereas explicit knowledge is less significant, (ii) the most common means of knowledge transfer is that the successor uses the founder’s knowledge to innovate within the family business and (iii) the working atmosphere allows for ideas and knowledge to be shared, which is linked to the culture of family businesses. The paper also showed that family members prioritize their well-being and the well-being of their employees more than profit maximization in family businesses. Instead of seeking a one-sided knowledge transfer fit, the next generation should create novel insights and knowledge that are pertinent to the already-existing knowledge-based business.
AddisM. (2016). Tacit and explicit knowledge in construction management. Construction Management and Economics, 34(7–8), 439–445. 10.1080/01446193.2016.1180416
2.
AduI. N., TwumasiE., BoakyeK. O., & Kyei-FrimpongM. (2023). Does organizational support moderate the influence of family–work conflict on career progression?FIIB Business Review, 231971452211252. 10.1177/23197145221125294
3.
AlaviM., & LeidnerD. E. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107. 10.2307/3250961
4.
ArgoteL., & IngramP. (2000). Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 150–169. 10.1006/obhd.2000.2893
5.
Barnett-PageE., & ThomasJ. (2009). Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: A critical review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9(1), 59. 10.1186/1471-2288-9-59
6.
BosuaR., & VenkitachalamK. (2013). Aligning strategies and processes in knowledge management: A framework. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(3), 331–346. 10.1108/JKM-10-2012-0323
7.
BoteroI. C., Barroso MartínezA., SanguinoG., & BinhoteJ. (2022). The family’s effect on knowledge sharing in family firms. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(2), 459–481. 10.1108/JKM-08-2020-0653
8.
BoydJ., UptonN., & WircenskiM. (1999). Mentoring in family firms: A reflective analysis of senior executives’ perceptions. Family Business Review, 12(4), 299–309. 10.1111/j.1741-6248.1999.00299.x
9.
BratianuC. (2013). Nonlinear integrators of the organizational intellectual capital. In FathiM. (Ed.), Integration of practice-oriented knowledge technology: Trends and prospectives (pp. 3–15). Springer. 10.1007/978-3-642-34471-8_1
10.
BrinkerinkJ. (2018). Broad search, deep search, and the absorptive capacity performance of family and non-family firm R&D. Family Business Review, 31(3), 295–317. 10.1177/0894486518775187
11.
Cabrera-SuárezK., De Saá-PérezP., & García-AlmeidaD. (2001). The succession process from a resource and knowledge-based view of the family firm. Family Business Review, 14(1), 37–46. 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2001.00037.x
12.
ChiricoF. (2008). Knowledge accumulation in family firms: Evidence from four case studies. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 26(4), 433–462. 10.1177/0266242608091173
13.
CollinsL., & O’ReganN. (2011). Editorial: The evolving field of family business. Journal of Family Business Management, 1(1), 5–13. 10.1108/20436231111122245
14.
CombsJ. G., ShanineK. K., BurrowsS., AllenJ. S., & PoundsT. W. (2020). What do we know about business families? Setting the stage for leveraging family science theories. Family Business Review, 33(1), 38–63. 10.1177/0894486519863508
15.
CreswellJ. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.
DaspitJ. J., HoltD. T., ChrismanJ. J., & LongR. G. (2016). Examining family firm succession from a social exchange perspective: A multiphase, multistakeholder review. Family Business Review, 29(1), 44–64. 10.1177/0894486515599688
18.
DaspitJ. J., LongR. G., & PearsonA. W. (2019). How familiness affects innovation outcomes via absorptive capacity: A dynamic capability perspective of the family firm. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 10(2), 133–143. 10.1016/j.jfbs.2018.11.003
19.
De MassisA., ChuaJ. H., & ChrismanJ. J. (2008). Factors preventing intra-family succession. Family Business Review, 21(2), 183–199. 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00118.x
20.
De MassisA., FrattiniF., & LichtenthalerU. (2013). Research on technological innovation in family firms: Present debates and future directions. Family Business Review, 26(1), 10–31. 10.1177/0894486512466258
21.
De MassisA., & KotlarJ. (2014). The case study method in family business research: Guidelines for qualitative scholarship. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(1), 15–29. 10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.007
22.
DesouzaK. C., & AwazuY. (2006). Knowledge management at SMEs: Five peculiarities. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(1), 32–43. 10.1108/13673270610650085
23.
Diéguez-SotoJ., López-DelgadoP., & Rojo-RamírezA. (2015). Identifying and classifying family businesses. Review of Managerial Science, 9(3), 603–634. 10.1007/s11846-014-0128-6
24.
DuffieldS. M., & WhittyS. J. (2016). Application of the systemic lessons learned knowledge model for organisational learning through projects. International Journal of Project Management, 34(7), 1280–1293. 10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.07.001
25.
DuhM. (2014). Family business succession as knowledge creation process. Kybernetes, 43(5), 699–714. 10.1108/K-08-2013-0172
26.
DurstS., & EdvardssonI. R. (2012). Knowledge management in SMEs: A literature review. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(6), 879–903. 10.1108/13673271211276173
27.
Easterby-SmithM., ThorpeR., & JacksonP. (2015). Management and business research (5th edition). Sage.
28.
EisenhardtK. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. 10.2307/258557
29.
GersickK. E., DavisJ. A., HamptonM. M., & LansbergI. (1997). Generation to generation: Life cycles of the family business. Harvard Business Review Press.
30.
GrantR. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm: Knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109–122. 10.1002/smj.4250171110
31.
GrigoriouK., & RothaermelF. T. (2017). Organizing for knowledge generation: Internal knowledge networks and the contingent effect of external knowledge sourcing. Strategic Management Journal, 38(2), 395–414. 10.1002/smj.2489
32.
GuQ., JitpaipoonT., & YangJ. (2017). The impact of information integration on financial performance: A knowledge-based view. International Journal of Production Economics, 191, 221–232. 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.06.005
33.
HatakI. R., & RoesslD. (2015). Relational competence-based knowledge transfer within intrafamily succession: An experimental study. Family Business Review, 28(1), 10–25. 10.1177/0894486513480386
34.
HongH., KimJ., KimT., & LeemB. (2008). The effect of knowledge on system integration project performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 108(3), 385–404. 10.1108/02635570810858787
35.
IbidunniA. S., AgbiB. D., & KehindeB. E. (2022). Interacting effects of tacit knowledge and learning orientation in improving firm performance. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1–22.
36.
IravaW. J., & MooresK. (2010). Clarifying the strategic advantage of familiness: Unbundling its dimensions and highlighting its paradoxes. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1(3), 131–144. 10.1016/j.jfbs.2010.08.002
37.
KellermannsF. W., & EddlestonK. A. (2004). Feuding families: When conflict does a family firm good. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(3), 209–228. 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00040.x
38.
KotlarJ., & De MassisA. (2013). Goal setting in family firms: Goal diversity, social interactions, and collective commitment to family-centered goals. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(6), 1263–1288. 10.1111/etap.12065
39.
Le Breton-MillerI., MillerD., & SteierL. P. (2004). Toward an integrative model of effective fob succession. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 305–328. 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00047.x
40.
LiebowitzJ. (Ed.). (2012). Beyond knowledge management: What every leader should know. CRC Press.
41.
MagistrettiS., Dell’EraC., FrattiniF., & Messeni PetruzzelliA. (2020). Innovation through tradition in design-intensive family firms. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(4), 823–839. 10.1108/JKM-07-2019-0399
42.
MazzolaP., MarchisioG., & AstrachanJ. (2008). Strategic planning in family business: A powerful developmental tool for the next generation. Family Business Review, 21(3), 239–258. 10.1177/08944865080210030106
43.
MilesM. B., & HubermanA. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Sage Publications.
44.
MillerD., SteierL., & Le Breton-MillerI. (2003). Lost in time: Intergenerational succession, change, and failure in family business. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 513–531. 10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00058-2
45.
MotwaniJ., LevenburgN. M., SchwarzT. V., & BlanksonC. (2006). Succession planning in SMEs: An empirical analysis. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 24(5), 471–495. 10.1177/0266242606067270
46.
MyersM. D. (2013). Qualitative research in business & management (2nd ed). Sage.
47.
NonakaI. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37. 10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
48.
NonakaI., ByosiereP., BoruckiC. C., & KonnoN. (1994). Organizational knowledge creation theory: A first comprehensive test. International Business Review, 3(4), 337–351. 10.1016/0969-5931(94)90027-2
49.
NonakaI., & TakeuchiH. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press.
50.
NonakaI., & Von KroghG. (2009). Perspective—tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organization Science, 20(3), 635–652. 10.1287/orsc.1080.0412
51.
PearsonA. W., CarrJ. C., & ShawJ. C. (2008). Toward a theory of familiness: A social capital perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(6), 949–969. 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00265.x
52.
PipatanantakurnK., & RacthamV. V. (2022). The role of knowledge creation and transfer in family firm succession. Sustainability, 14(10), 5845. 10.3390/su14105845
53.
QiuH., & FreelM. (2020). Managing family-related conflicts in family businesses: A review and research agenda. Family Business Review, 33(1), 90–113. 10.1177/0894486519893223
54.
RajapathiranaR. P. J., & HuiY. (2018). Relationship between innovation capability, innovation type, and firm performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3(1), 44–55. 10.1016/j.jik.2017.06.002
55.
ReayT. (2014). Publishing qualitative research. Family Business Review, 27(2), 95–102. 10.1177/0894486514529209
56.
SardeshmukhS. R., & CorbettA. C. (2011). The duality of internal and external development of successors: Opportunity recognition in family firms. Family Business Review, 24(2), 111–125. 10.1177/0894486510391783
57.
SaenzJ., AramburuN., & BlancoC. E. (2012). Knowledge sharing and innovation in Spanish and Colombian high-tech firms. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17, 191–933.
58.
ShamsuddohaM., & KashemM. A. (2022). A revolutionary paradigm shift in supply chain management: The blockchain mechanism. In Rana, SakshiS., & SinghJ. (Eds.), Exploring the latest trends in management literature (Vol. 1, pp. 15–33). Emerald Publishing Limited. 10.1108/S2754-586520220000001002
59.
ShamsuddohaM., & WoodsideA. G. (2022). Achieving radical process innovations by applying technology-mindset transformations via second-order system-dynamics engineering. Journal of Business Research, 147, 37–48. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.006
60.
SharmaP., ChrismanJ. J., & GersickK. E. (2012). 25 years of Family Business Review: Reflections on the past and perspectives for the future. Family Business Review, 25(1), 5–15. 10.1177/0894486512437626
61.
SinghS., & ChakrabortyA. (2023). Construing the relationship between entrepreneurial adversity and mental well-being of small business owners during COVID-19 outbreak: The mediating role of entrepreneurial resilience. FIIB Business Review, 231971452211339. 10.1177/23197145221133971
62.
SnyderJ., & Eng Lee-PartridgeJ. (2013). Understanding communication channel choices in team knowledge sharing. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 18(4), 417–431. 10.1108/CCIJ-03-2012-0026
63.
SolukJ., MiroshnychenkoI., KammerlanderN., & De MassisA. (2021). Family influence and digital business model innovation: The enabling role of dynamic capabilities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(4), 867–905. 10.1177/1042258721998946
64.
SuE., & CarneyM. (2013). Can China’s family firms create intellectual capital?Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(3), 657–675. 10.1007/s10490-012-9302-z
65.
SwapW., LeonardD., ShieldsM., & AbramsL. (2001). Using mentoring and storytelling to transfer knowledge in the workplace. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 95–114. 10.1080/07421222.2001.11045668
66.
TorresA. I., FerrazS. S., & Santos-RodriguesH. (2018). The impact of knowledge management factors in organizational sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19(2), 453–472. 10.1108/JIC-12-2016-0143
67.
VrečkoI., & LebeS. S. (2013). Project management supports (requisitely) holistic: Socially responsible action in business systems. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 26(6), 561–569. 10.1007/s11213-013-9304-x
68.
YinR. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.
