Sustainability Indices serve as a benchmark for the companies screened for their superior performance on environmental, social and governance (ESG) parameters. This article intends to compare the overall and regime-specific financial performance of socially responsible indices of the National Stock Exchange, Nifty100 ESG and Nifty100 ESG Enhanced with Nifty50 (representing the market) from 1 April 2012 to 31 March 2020. Overall comparative performance analysis of these indices is conducted using risk-adjusted return measures and volatility has been captured through the TGARCH model. Further, time duration has been decomposed into regimes using Markov Regime Switching Model and the comparison of indices has been undertaken in both regimes. Our findings suggest that there is no significant difference between the return performance of sustainability indices and market benchmark index in single time duration and sustainability indices performing marginally better in both the regimes identified. This implies that socially responsible investments in India are providing reasonable returns to investors without comprising non-financial objectives. For corporates, it is a win–win situation to focus on ESG parameters to attract capital from investors and deliver better corporate financial performance and hence increasing the potential of growth of socially responsible investing in India.
AbramsonL., & ChungD. (2000). Socially responsible investing: Viable for value investors?The Journal of Investing, 9(3), 73–80.
2.
AcarM., & TemizH. (2020). Empirical analysis on corporate environmental performance and environmental disclosure in an emerging market context. International Journal of Emerging Markets. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-04-2019-0255
3.
AdlerT., & KritzmanM. (2008). The cost of socially responsible investing. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 35(1), 52–56.
4.
AlbaityM., & AhmadR. (2011). Return performance and leverage effect in Islamic and socially responsible stock indices evidence from Dow Jones (DJ) and Financial Times Stock Exchange (FTSE). African Journal of Business Management, 5(16), 6927–6939.
AngelidisT., SakkasA., & TessaromatisN. (2015). Stock market dispersion, the business cycle and expected factor returns. Journal of Banking & Finance, 59, 265–279.
7.
AwartaniB. M., & CorradiV. (2005). Predicting the volatility of the S&P-500 stock index via GARCH models: The role of asymmetries. International Journal of Forecasting, 21(1), 167–183.
8.
AzmiW., NgA., DewandaruG., & NagayevR. (2019). Doing well while doing good: The case of Islamic and sustainability equity investing. Borsa Istanbul Review, 19(3), 207–218.
9.
BasuD., & ChawlaD. (2010). An empirical test of CAPM—The case of Indian stock market. Global Business Review, 11(2), 209–220.
10.
BauerR., KoedijkK., & OttenR. (2005). International evidence on ethical mutual fund performance and investment style. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(7), 1751–1767.
11.
BazziM., BlasquesF., KoopmanS. J., & LucasA. (2017). Time-varying transition probabilities for Markov regime-switching models. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 38(3), 458–478.
12.
BecchettiL., & CicirettiR. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and stock market performance. Applied Financial Economics, 19(16), 1283–1293.
13.
BensonC. C., GuptaN., & MatetiR. (2010). Does risk reduction mitigate the costs of going green?—An empirical study of sustainable investing. An Empirical Study of Sustainable Investing, 2, 7–25.
14.
BertrandP., & LapointeV. (2015). How performance of risk-based strategies is modified by socially responsible investment universe?International Review of Financial Analysis, 38, 175–190.
15.
BhatiaP., & GuptaP. (2020). Sub-prime crisis or COVID-19: A comparative analysis of volatility in Indian banking sectoral indices. FIIB Business Review, 9(4), 286–299.
16.
BhuianS., & SharmaS. K. (2017). Predicting consumer pro-environmental behavioral intention: The moderating role of religiosity. Review of International Business and Strategy, 27(3), 352–368.
17.
BinMahfouzS., & HassanM. K. (2013). Sustainable and socially responsible investing. Humanomics, 29(3), 164–186.
BorgersA., DerwallJ., KoedijkK., & Ter HorstJ. (2015). Do social factors influence investment behavior and performance? Evidence from mutual fund holdings. Journal of Banking & Finance, 60, 112–126.
20.
ChangyongF. E. N. G., HongyueW. A. N. G., NaijiL. U., TianC. H. E. N., HuaH. E., & YingL. U. (2014). Log-transformation and its implications for data analysis. Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry, 26(2), 105.
21.
CharfeddineL., NajahA., & TeulonF. (2016). Socially responsible investing and Islamic funds: New perspectives for portfolio allocation. Research in International Business and Finance, 36, 351–361.
22.
CheungW. A., LiH., & RocaE. (2010). The performance of socially responsible investments across different market regimes (No. finance: 201018). Griffith University, Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics.
23.
ClarkE., DeshmukhN., & BelghitarY. (2014, June). Does active ethical investing pay–evidence from the UK. In 21st Annual Conference of the Multinational Finance Society.
24.
CoffieW. (2015). Modelling and forecasting the conditional heteroscedasticity of stock returns using asymmetric models: Empirical evidence from Ghana and Nigeria. Journal of Accounting & Finance, 15(5), 2158–3625.
25.
CollisonD. J., CobbG., PowerD. M., & StevensonL. A. (2008). The financial performance of the FTSE4Good indices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 14–28.
26.
CortezM. C., SilvaF., & ArealN. (2009). The performance of European socially responsible funds. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(4), 573–588.
27.
DalalK. K., & ThakerN. (2019). ESG and corporate financial performance: A panel study of Indian companies. IUP Journal of Corporate Governance, 18(1), 44–59.
28.
de Souza CunhaF. A. F., & SamanezC. P. (2013). Performance analysis of sustainable investments in the Brazilian stock market: A study about the corporate sustainability index (ISE). Journal of Business Ethics, 117(1), 19–36.
29.
EmenikeK. O. (2010, February10). Modelling stock returns volatility in Nigeria using GARCH models. Proceeding of International Conference on Management and Enterprice Development, Ebitimi Banigo Auditorium, University of Port Harcourt - Nigeria, 1(4), 5–11.
30.
EntineJ. (2003). The myth of social investing: A critique of its practice and consequences for corporate social performance research. Organization & Environment, 16(3), 352–368.
31.
EngleR. F. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 50(4), 987–1007.
32.
GalemaR., PlantingaA., & ScholtensB. (2008). The stocks at stake: Return and risk in socially responsible investment. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(12), 2646–2654.
33.
GoldreyerE. F., & DiltzJ. D. (1999). The performance of socially responsible mutual funds: Incorporating socio-political information in portfolio selection. Managerial Finance, 25(1), 23–36.
34.
GoudarziH., & RamanarayananC. S. (2011). Modeling asymmetric volatility in the Indian stock market. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(3), 221–231.
35.
GuidolinM., & HydeS. (2009). What tames the Celtic tiger? Portfolio implications from a multivariate Markov Switching model. Applied Financial Economics, 19(6), 463–488.
GuptaD. (2011). Socially responsible investing in India: Myth or reality (Working paper). Oikos PRI Young Scholars Academy 2011: The future of responsible investment.
38.
HafnerC. M., & HerwartzH. (2000). Testing for linear autoregressive dynamics under heteroskedasticity. The Econometrics Journal, 3(2), 177–197.
39.
HansenP. R., & LundeA. (2005). A forecast comparison of volatility models: Does anything beat a GARCH (1, 1)?Journal of Applied Econometrics, 20(7), 873–889.
40.
HeZ., O’ConnorF., & ThijssenJ. (2018). Is gold a sometime safe haven or an always hedge for equity investors? A Markov-switching CAPM approach for US and UK stock indices. International Review of Financial Analysis, 60, 30–37.
JainM., SharmaG. D., & SrivastavaM. (2019). Can sustainable investment yield better financial returns: A comparative study of ESG indices and MSCI indices. Risks, 7(1), 15.
43.
JaisinghaniD., & SekhonA. K. (2020). CSR disclosures and profit persistence: Evidence from India. International Journal of Emerging Markets. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-03-2020-0246
44.
KrolzigH. M. (1997). The Markov-switching vector autoregressive model. In Markov-Switching Vector Autoregressions (pp. 6–28). Springer.
45.
LeanH. H., AngW. R., & SmythR. (2015). Performance and performance persistence of socially responsible investment funds in Europe and North America. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 34, 254–266.
46.
LeanH. H., & NguyenD. K. (2014). Policy uncertainty and performance characteristics of sustainable investments across regions around the global financial crisis. Applied Financial Economics, 24(21), 1367–1373.
47.
LiH., CheungA., & RocaE. (2010, August). Socially responsible investment, good and bad times. In 23rd Australasian Finance and Banking Conference.
48.
LinZ. (2018). Modelling and forecasting the stock market volatility of SSE Composite Index using GARCH models. Future Generation Computer Systems, 79, 960–972.
49.
LütkepohlH., & XuF. (2012). The role of the log transformation in forecasting economic variables. Empirical Economics, 42(3), 619–638.
MandelbrotB. B. (1997). The variation of certain speculative prices. In Fractals and scaling in finance (pp. 371–418). Springer.
52.
NiyitegekaO., & TewarD. D. (2013). Volatility clustering at the Johannesburg stock exchange: Investigation and analysis. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(14), 621.
53.
OnwukweC. E., BasseyB. E. E., & IsaacI. O. (2011). On modeling the volatility of Nigerian stock returns using GARCH models. Journal of Mathematics Research, 3(4), 31–43.
54.
OrtasE., MonevaJ. M., & SalvadorM. (2012). Does socially responsible investment equity indexes in emerging markets pay off? Evidence from Brazil. Emerging Markets Review, 13(4), 581–597.
55.
PaulK. (2017). The effect of business cycle, market return and momentum on financial performance of socially responsible investing mutual funds. Social Responsibility Journal, 13(3), 513–528.
56.
ReboredoJ. C. (2010). Nonlinear effects of oil shocks on stock returns: A Markov-switching approach. Applied Economics, 42(29), 3735–3744.
57.
RehmanR. U., ZhangJ., UppalJ., CullinanC., & NaseemM. A. (2016). Are environmental social governance equity indices a better choice for investors? An Asian perspective. Business Ethics: A European Review, 4(25), 440–459.
58.
SabiruzzamanM., HuqM. M., BegR. A., & AnwarS. (2010). Modeling and forecasting trading volume index: GARCH versus TGARCH approach. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 50(2), 141–145.
59.
SardyS. (2009). Adaptive posterior mode estimation of a sparse sequence for model selection. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 36(4), 577–601.
60.
SariannidisN., GiannarakisG., LitinasN., & KonteosG. (2010). Α GARCH examination of macroeconomic effects on US stock market: A distinction between the total market index and the sustainability index. European Research Studies Journal, 13(1), 129–142.
61.
SauerD. A. (1997). The impact of social-responsibility screens on investment performance: Evidence from the Domini 400 Social Index and Domini Equity Mutual Fund. Review of Financial Economics, 6(2), 137–149.
62.
SchröderM. (2004). The performance of socially responsible investments: Investment funds and indices. Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, 18(2), 122–142.
63.
SchröderM. (2007). Is there a difference? The performance characteristics of SRI equity indices. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 34(1–2), 331–348.
64.
SchuethS. (2003). Socially responsible investing in the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(3), 189–194.
65.
ShankT., ManullangD., & HillR. (2005). “Doing well while doing good” revisited: A study of socially responsible firms’ short-term versus long-term performance. Managerial Finance, 31(8), 33–46.
66.
ŚliwińskiP., & ŁobzaM. (2017a). Financial performance of socially responsible indices. International Journal of Management and Economics, 53(1), 25–46.
67.
ŚliwińskiP., & ŁobzaM. (2017b). The impact of global risk on the performance of socially responsible and conventional stock indices. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 12(4), 657–674.
68.
StatmanM. (2006). Socially responsible indexes. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 32(3), 100–109.
69.
SudhaS. (2014). Risk-return and volatility analysis of sustainability index in India. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 17(6), 1329–1342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-014-9608-8
70.
TalanG., & SharmaG. D. (2019). Doing well by doing good: A systematic review and research agenda for sustainable investment. Sustainability, 11(2), 353.
71.
TiA., DuZ., & ZhangW. (2019, December). Analysis on the volatility of sustainable stock index and traditional stock index based on GARCH model. In 2019 International Conference on Economic Management and Model, Engineering (ICEMME) (pp. 47–50). IEEE.
72.
TripathiV., & BhandariV. (2014). Socially responsible investing—An emerging concept in investment management. FIIB Business Review, 3(4), 16–30.
73.
TripathiV., & KaurA. (2020). Socially responsible investing: Performance evaluation of BRICS nations. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 17(4), 525–547.
74.
VasalV. K. (2009). Corporate social responsibility & shareholder returns—Evidence from the Indian Capital Market. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 44(3), 376–385.
75.
YadavM. P., & SinhaN. (2021). Investigating the impact of corporate social responsibility on competitive performance: An empirical study based on panel data analysis. FIIB Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/23197145211015443
76.
YavasB. F., & RezayatF. (2016). Country ETF returns and volatility spillovers in emerging stock markets, Europe and USA. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 11(3), 419–437.
