This study uses the network approach of entrepreneurship to investigate the relationship between networks and the growth of entrepreneurial ventures. Most of the earlier researchers have maintained a static view of entrepreneurial networks which underplays the dynamic nature of networks. This study attempts to identify the major network characteristics during different growth stages of the ventures in the context of India. The data were collected from 173 information technology entrepreneurs through a cross-sectional survey. The study found that the characteristics of network diversity and network governance have a significant discriminative magnitude and thus play a significant role across all growth stages. Endorsement and embeddedness characteristics also have a significant discriminative magnitude but not in the initial stages. However, network inertia and relational mix were found to have a discriminative magnitude only during the survival and success stages of growth. Overall, the study contributes to further extend the dynamic view of entrepreneurial networks with evidences from an emerging market.
AlbersS. (2010). Configurations of alliance governance systems. Schmalenbach Business Review, 62(3), 204–233.
2.
AldrichH.ZimmerC. (1986). Entrepreneurship through social networks. In SextonD. L.SmilorR. W. (Eds.), The art and science of entrepreneurship (pp. 3–23). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company.
3.
AllenK.StearnsT. (2003). Nascent high-tech entrepreneurs: The who, where, when, and why. In GaryD. L. (Ed.). Issues in entrepreneurship (Advances in the study of entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth (Vol. 14, pp. 195–218). Melbourne: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
4.
BatjargalB. (2006). The dynamics of entrepreneurs’ networks in a transitioning economy: The case of Russia. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development: An International Journal, 18(4), 305–320.
5.
BaumJ. A. C. (1996). Organizational ecology. In CleggS.HardyC.NordW. (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 77–114). London: SAGE.
6.
BaumJ. A.CalabreseT.SilvermanB. S. (2000). Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 267–294.
7.
BhushanB.PandeyS. (2015). Exploring the dynamics of network characteristics for Indian high technology entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 5(12). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40497-015-0029-4
8.
BirleyS. (1985). The role of networks in the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 1, 107–117.
9.
BruderlJ.PreisendörferP. (1998). Network support and the success of newly founded nosiness. Small Business Economics, 10, 213–225.
10.
BurtR. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 345–423.
11.
ChurchillN. C.LewisV. (1983). The five stages of small business growth. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 30–50.
12.
DrowningS. (2005). The social construction of social entrepreneurship: Narrative and dramatic processes in the coproduction of organizations and identities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(2), 185–204.
13.
DyerJ. H.SinghH. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management, 23(4), 660–679.
14.
ElfringT.HulsinkW. (2003). Networks in entrepreneurship: The case of high-technology firms. Small Business Economics, 21, 409–422.
15.
GranovetterM. S. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem with embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510.
16.
HansenE. (1995). Entrepreneurial networks and new organization growth. Entrepreneur Theory and Practice, 19(4), 7–21.
17.
HiteJ. (2000). Patterns of multidimensionality in embedded network ties of emerging entrepreneurial firms. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Toronto, Canada.
18.
HiteJ. M. (2005). Evolutionary processes and paths of relationally embedded network ties in emerging entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 29(1), 113–144.
19.
HiteJ. M.HesterlyW. S. (2001). The evolution of firm networks: From emergence to early growth of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 275–286.
20.
HoangH.AntoncicB. (2003). Network-based research in entrepreneurship: A critical review. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 165–187.
21.
HoangH.YiA. (2015). Network-based research in entrepreneurship: A decade in review. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 11(1), 1–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/0300000052.
22.
JackS. L. (2010). Approaches to study networks: Implications and outcomes. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 120–137.
23.
JackS. L.MoultS.AndersonA. R.DoddS. (2010). An entrepreneurial network evolving: Patterns of change. International Small Business Journal, 28(4), 315–337.
24.
JackS. L.AndersonA. R.Drakopoulou-DoddS. (2008). Time and contingency in the development of entrepreneurial networks. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 20(2), 125–159.
25.
KhannaT.PalepuK. G. (2005). Spotting institutional voids in emerging markets. Harvard Business School Background Note106–014.
26.
KhannaT. (2014). Entrepreneurship in emerging markets: Contextual intelligence for the study of two thirds of the world’s population. Multidisciplinary insights from new AIB fellows (Research in global strategic management, Vol. 16, pp. 221–238). Melbourne: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
27.
KeckS. (1997). Top management team structure: Differential effects by environmental context. Organization Science, 8(2), 143–156.
28.
KimT.-Y.OhH.SwaminathanA. (2006). Framing inter-organizational network change: A network inertia perspective. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 704–720.
29.
LarsonA. L.StarrJ. A. (1993). A network model of organization formation. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 17(2), 5–15.
30.
LechnerC.DowlingM.WelpeI. (2006). Firm networks and firm development: The role of the relational mix. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(4), 514–540.
31.
LofstenP.LindelofH. (2005). Academic versus corporate new technology-based firms in Swedish science parks: An analysis of performance, business networks and financing. International Journal of Technology Management, 31(3), 334–357.
32.
LiaoJ.WelschH. (2003). Social capital and entrepreneurial growth aspiration: A comparison of technology-and non-technology-based nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14(1), 149–170.
33.
MaurerI.EbersM. (2006). Dynamics of social capital and their performance implications: Lessons from biotechnology start-ups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(2), 262–292.
34.
NahapietJ.GhoshalS. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.
35.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978). Psychometric theory(2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
36.
PiaA.KatjaL. (2011). Entrepreneurial teams and the evolution of networks: A longitudinal study. Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 12(4), 239–247.
37.
ProvanK.FishA.SydowJ. (2007). Interorganisational networks at the network level: A review of the empirical literature on whole networks. Journal of Management, 33(3), 479–516.
38.
ProvanK.KenisP. (2007). Modes of network governance: Structure, management and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252.
39.
RamayahT.AhmadN. H.HalimaH. A.ZainalS. R. M.LoM.-C. (2010). Discriminant analysis: An illustrated case. African Journal of Business Management, 4(9), 1654–1667.
40.
ReeseP. R.AldrichH. E. (1995). Entrepreneurial networks and business performance. In BirleyS.MacMillanI. C. (Eds.), International entrepreneurship (pp. 124–144). London: Routledge.
41.
RosenblattM. (2018). Evolving processes of entrepreneurship networks. Faculty Works: Business, 40. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.molloy.edu/bus_fac/40.
42.
SalancikG. R. (1995). Wanted: A good network theory of organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 345–349.
43.
SchutjensV.StamE. (2003). The evolution and nature of young firm networks: A longitudinal perspective. Small Business Economics, 21, 115–134.
44.
SelltizC.WrightsmanL. S.CookS. W.BachG. I.HogsletterR.BickmanL. (1976). Research methods in social relations. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
45.
Slotte-KockS.CovielloN. (2010). Entrepreneurship research on network processes: A review and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 34(1), 31–57.
46.
SmithK. G.SmithK. A.OlianJ. D.SimsJr H. P.O’BanonD. P.ScullyJ. A. (1994). Top management team and demography: The role of social integration and communication. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 412–438.
47.
SoetantoD. (2017). Networks and entrepreneurial learning: coping with difficulties. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 23(3), 547–565. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-11-2015-0230
48.
SoetantoD.JackS. L. (2011). Networks and networking activities of innovative firms in incubators: An exploratory study. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 12(2), 127–136.
49.
StinchcombeA. L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In MarchJ. G. (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 153–193). Chicago, IL: Rand-McNally.
50.
StroblA.KronenbergC. (2016). Entrepreneurial networks across the business life cycle: The case of alpine hospitality entrepreneurs. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(6), 1177–1203. doi: 10.1108/IJCHM-03-2014-0147
51.
StuartT. E. (2000). Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 791–811.
52.
StuartT. E.HoangH.HybelsR. (1999). Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 315–349.
TavakolM.DennickR. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55.
55.
WegnerD.KoetzC. (2016). The influence of network governance mechanisms on the performance of small firms. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 27(4), 463–479.
56.
WesterlundM.RajalaR.LeminenS.IsabelleD. A. (2017). Do relationships facilitate growth in small technology firms. International Journal of Technoentrepreneurship, 3(3), 228–243.
57.
WuL.WangC.ChenC.PanL. (2008). Internal resources, external network, and competitiveness during the growth stage: A study of Taiwanese high-tech ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 528–549.
