Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Diversity means variations in social, economic, demographic and employment factors. The diversity of the workforce, social and demographic-wise, is an interesting comparison for a study on diversity management. The purpose of the research work is to estimate the direction and relationship of identified social, demographic and economic diversity factors on job perspectives, namely firm and peers, job and life and human resource management (HRM) systems. The conceptual framework is built on diversity factors, such as age, gender, marital status, religion, nativity, caste and salary. The study is conducted on a random sample of 928 employees, spread across five industrial and service sectors in a public sector steel plant, two private sector steel plants, a BPO, a public sector information technology (IT) firm and private sector IT firm. The sample includes executives and non-executives within the respective industrial employments. The Cronbach’s α values for all 176 items of job perspective factors are in the range of 0.938 to 0.770. The perception of peers has an inverse impact by age diversity. The age, religion and caste diversity on the job and in life is moving in the reverse direction. The age and religion diversity presents a similar trend in HRM systems. The age, religion and caste diversity are major diverse variables on HRM systems, job and life and perception on firm and peers. Diversity factors in the Indian context on HRM factors, job and life and firm and peers are the reflection of age, religion and caste.

Keywords

Business environment human resource management industrial psychology organisational behaviour

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abidi

, Zaim

, Youssef

, Habibniya

, & Baran

(2017). Diversity management and its impact on HRM practices: Evidence from Kuwaiti companies. Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics, 10(20), 71–88.

Aumann

K. A.

, & Ostroff

(2006). Multi-level fit: An integrative framework for understanding HRM practices in cross-cultural contexts. In Yammarino

F. J.

& Dansereau

(Eds.), Multi-level issues in social systems (Research in multi-level issues, Vol. 5, pp. 13–79). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Choa

, & Allenb

T. D.

(2019). The transnational family: A typology and implications for work–family balance. Human Resource Management Review, 29(1), 76–86.

Cooke

, & Saini

(2010). Diversity management in India: A study of organizations in different ownership forms and industrial sectors. Human Resource Management, 49(3), 477–500.

Cornelissen

, Dustmann

, & Schonberg

(2017). Peer effects in the work place. American Economic Review, 107(2), 425–456.

Editor. (2008). Religion and corporate culture: Accommodating the religious diversity at the workplace: A survey report. Society for Human Resource Management.

Goulbourne

, Reynolds

, Solomos

, & Zontini

(2010). Transnational families ethnicities, identities and social capital. Routledge.

Haq

(2012). The managing diversity mindset in public versus private organizations in India. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(5), 892–914.

Kandel

, & Lazear

E. P.

(1992). Peer pressure and partnerships. Journal of Political Economy, 100(4), 801–817.

10.

Kundu

S. C.

, Bansal

, & Chawla

A. S.

(2015). Managing workforce diversity through HR practice. In Kundu

S. C.

, Arora

, Ram

, & Singh

(Eds.), Emerging horizons in business management (pp. 115–124). Victorious Publishers.

11.

Kunze

, Boehm

, & Bruch

(2013). Organizational performance consequences of age diversity: Inspecting the role of diversity-friendly HR policies and top managers’ negative age stereotypes. Journal of Management Studies, 50(3), 413–438.

12.

, Chen

, Huang

, & Chien

(2015). Effect of diversity on human resource management and organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 68(4), 857–861.

13.

Lucas

R. E.

Jr. , (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3–42.

14.

Marshall

(1890). Principles of economics. Macmillan.

15.

Meena

(2015). Diversity dimensions of India and their organization implications: An analysis. International Journal of Economic Management Science, 4(261), 1000261.

16.

Meena

, & Vanka

(2013). Diversity management and human resource development: A study of Indian organizations. Pacific Business Review International, 5(7), 45–51.

17.

Mukherjee. (2019). Managing the millennials. Human Capital, 22(9), 28–29.

18.

Parry

, & McCarthy

(2017). The Palgrave handbook of age diversity and work. Palgrave Macmillan.

19.

Rao

G. V.

(2018). The emerging fourth gender: Robot in new technology human resource management environment. Indian Journal of Training and Development, 48(3), 65–68.

20.

Rao

(2015). HRM trends in India: A professional perspective. Strategic HR Review, 14(1–2). https://doi.org/10.1108/SHR-01-2015-0002

21.

Saxena

(2014). Workforce diversity: A key to improve productivity. Procedia Economics and Finance, 11, 76–85.

22.

Shen

, Chanda

, D’Netto

, & Monga

(2009). Managing diversity through human resource management: An international perspective and conceptual framework. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20, 235–251.

23.

Wambui

T. W.

, Wangombe

J. G.

, Muthura

M. W.

, Kamau

A. W.

, & Jackson

S. M.

(2013). Managing workplace diversity: A Kenyan perspective. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(16), 199–218.

Effect of Diversity on Job Perspectives in Selected Sectors of the Indian Economy

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References