This article tries to understand the relationship between agency cost, debt financing and Indian real estate companies’ performance. The study attempts to document the effect of debt on the firm’s profitability and then explores the reason behind such an impact by introducing the agency cost as a parameter. The study is conducted in two phases. Phase I is carried out to establish the relationship between debt financing and the firm’s financial performance. In Phase II, the study is conducted to understand the impact of agency cost on debt financing. Firms from the BSE Realty Index were selected for the period 2011–2018. Profitability is measured through return on equity (ROE), whereas debt financing is measured through the firm’s leverage ratio. The agency cost is measured through the asset utilisation ratio and general expense to sales ratio. Panel regression method is used to understand the impact of debt financing and agency cost on the firms’ profitability. The result of Phase I suggests a significant negative relationship between debt financing and the ROE and the result of Phase II suggests a positive relationship between the agency cost and debt financing. This means that reduction in agency cost will lead to lesser amount of debt financing thereby improving the firm’s financial performance.
AborJ. (2005). The effect of capital structure on profitability: An empirical analysis of listed firms in Ghana. The Journal of Risk Finance, 6(5), 438–445
2.
AlcockJ., SteinerE., & TanK. J. (2010). On the capital structure of real estate firms (Paper presentation). 23rd Australasian Finance and Banking Conference, Sydney, Australia.
3.
Al-HomaidiE., FarhanN., AlahdalW., KhaledA., & QaidM. (2021). Factors affecting the profitability of Indian listed firms: A panel data approach. International Journal of Business Excellence, 23(1), 1–17.
4.
AngJ. S., ColeR. A., & LinJ. W. (2000). Agency costs and ownership structure. The Journal of Finance, 55(1), 81–106.
5.
BhattiI., & SajidM. (2014). The impact of free cash flows and agency costs on firm performance: Empirical evidence from KSE 100 index of Pakistan. SSRN. Retrieved July5, 2020, from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3008871
6.
ChadhaS., & SharmaA. (2015). Capital structure and firm performance: Empirical evidence from India. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 19(4), 295–302.
7.
ChandraK., & UdhayakumarC. (2018). Impact of capital structure on firm performance: Evidence from India. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 118(22), 955–959.
8.
CheffouA. I. (2011). Agency costs of equity and debt, and corporate incentive compensation policy: The French case (Paper presentation). International Conference of the French Finance Association, Montpellier, France.
9.
ChengM., & TzengZ. C. (2011). The effect of leverage on firm value and how the firm financial quality influence on this effect. World Journal of Management, 3(2), 30–53.
10.
CornettM., MarcusA., & TehranianH. (2008). Corporate governance and pay-for-performance: The impact of earnings management. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(2), 357–373.
11.
DaryantoaW. M., SamidibS., & DeraJ. (2018). The impact of financial liquidity and leverage on financial performance: Evidence from property and real estate enterprises in Indonesia. Management Science Letters, 8(1), 1345–1352.
12.
DattaS., DattaI., & RamanK. (2005). Managerial stock ownership and maturity structure of corporate debt. Journal of Finance, 60(5), 2333–2350.
13.
DawarV. (2014). Agency theory, capital structure and firm performance: Some Indian evidence. Managerial Finance, 40(12), 1190–1206.
14.
EhrhardtM., & BrighamE. F. (2011). Financial management: Theory and practice (13th ed.). Cengage Learning.
15.
GompersP., IshiiJ., & MetrickA. (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 107–156.
16.
GrossmanS., & HartO. (1982). Corporate financial structure and management incentives. In McCallJ. (ed.), The economics of information and uncertainty (pp. 107–140). University of Chicago Press.
17.
GummessonE. (2017). Case theory in business and management: Reinventing case study research (1st ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
18.
HabibH., KhanF., & WazirM. (2016). Impact of debt on profitability of firms; Evidence from non-financial sector of Pakistan. City University Research Journal, 6(1), 70–80.
19.
HelleinerE. (2011). Understanding the 2007–2008 global financial crisis: Lessons for scholars of international political economy. Annual Review of Political Science, 14(1), 67–87.
20.
HosseinJ., ZohrehH., & RoghaiehH. (2013). Investigation of the effect of agency costs on firm performance of listed firms in Tehran Stock Exchange. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 2(3), 771–776.
21.
IavorskyiM. (2013). The impact of capital structure on firm performance: Evidence from Ukraine [Master’s thesis]. Kyiv School of Economics, pp. 1–43. Retrieved August19, 2010, from http://www.kse.org.ua/download.php?downloadid=306
22.
JensenM. C. (1986). Agency cost of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329.
23.
JensenM. C., & MecklingW. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
24.
KadiogluE., KilicS., & YilmazE. A. (2017). Testing the relationship between free cash flow and company performance in Borsa Istanbul. International Business Research, 10(5), 148–158.
25.
KalashI. (2019). Firm leverage, agency costs and firm performance: An empirical research on service firms in Turkey. Journal of Human and Social Science Researches, 8(1), 624–636.
26.
LemmonM., & LinsK. (2003). Ownership structure, corporate governance, and firm value: Evidence from the East Asian financial crisis. The Journal of Finance, 58(4), 1445–1468.
27.
MamaroL., & LegotloT. (2020). The impact of debt financing on financial performance: Evidence from retail firms listed on the JSE. Journal of Accounting and Management, 10(3), 23–33.
28.
MehtaP. (2013). Relationship between capital structure and financial performance: Evidence from Indian stock market. Clear International Journal of Research in Commerce & Management, 4(3), 31–40.
29.
MorriG., & FabioC. (2009). What determines the capital structure of real estate companies? An analysis of the EPRA/NAREIT Europe index. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 27(4), 318–372.
30.
MugeraA., & NyambaneG. (2014). Impact of debt structure on production efficiency and financial performance of broadacre farms in Western Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 59(2), 208–224.
31.
MulyadiM. S. (2018). Developing corporate governance in Myanmar—Lessons learned from corporate governance development in Indonesia. International Journal of Business Excellence, 14(3), 414–425.
32.
MyersS. (1977). Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, 5(1), 147–175.
33.
NobaneeH., & AbrahamJ. (2017). The impact of free cash flow, equity concentration and agency costs on firm’s profitability. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 14(2), 19–26.
34.
NwudeE., ItiriI., AgbaduaB., & UdehS. (2016). The impact of debt structure on firm performance: Empirical evidence from Nigerian quoted firms. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 6(11), 647–660.
35.
OplerT., PinkowitzL., StulzR., & WilliamsonR. (1999). The determinants and implications of corporate cash holdings. Journal of Financial Economics, 52(1), 3–46.
36.
PadachiK. (2006). Trends in working capital management and its impact on firms’ performance: An analysis of Mauritian small manufacturing firms. International Review of Business Research Papers, 2(2), 45–48.
37.
PandeyK., & SahuT. (2019). Debt financing, agency cost and firm performance: Evidence from India. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 23(3), 267–274.
38.
Pangea Property Partners. (2017). Real estate outlook—Sweden. Pangea Property Partners. Retrieved November12, 2009, from https://www.pangeapartners.se/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Outlook-2017-Sweden-web.pdf
39.
PatrickO., OrinyaJ., & AlewiK. (2013). The impact of capital structure on firms’ performance in Nigeria. MPRA. Retrieved September15, 2020, from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/45986/1/MPRA_paper_45986.pdf
40.
PrakK., & JangS. (2013). Capital structure, free cash flow, diversification and firm performance: A holistic analysis. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 33(1), 51–63.
41.
RakeshH., & LakshmiP. (2013). Capital structure on agency costs: Evidence from Indian public companies. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 15(1), 50–53.
42.
Riksbank. (2017). Financial stability report. SVERIGES RIKSBANK. Retrieved December23, 2013, from https://www.riksbank.se/globalassets/media/rapporter/fsr/engelska/2017/fsr-170524/rap_fsr1_170524_eng.pdf
43.
RufusO. A., & OfoegbuG. N. (2017). Impact of capital structure and financial performance of construction and real estate quoted companies in Nigeria. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 5(10), 7186–7199.
44.
SahniD., & KulkarniH. S. (2018). Study on impact of financial leverage and liquidity on financial performance: A case study on DLF ltd.; Construction & contracting—Real estate company in India. International Journal of Research in Management, Economics and Commerce, 8(1), 60–64.
45.
SharmaR. K. (2018). Factors affecting financial leveraging for BSE listed real estate development companies in India. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 23(3), 274–294.
46.
ShleiferA., & VishnyR. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783.
47.
TianG., ZhaoS., & ZhuY. (2010). How does the separation of ownership and control affect corporate performance: The impact of earnings management in China. SSRN Electronic Journal. Retrieved May5, 2020, from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a70f/6c6c8dbd14f20e5c449be14fc1299cfbc79a.pdf
48.
TitmanS., & WesselsR. (1988). The determinants of capital structure choice. The Journal of Finance, 43(1), 1–19.
49.
UBS. (2017, November10). Real estate—Navigate your investment journey. UBS Asset Management.
50.
UrsA. (2019). About $58 billion of total loan advances to Indian realty sector completely stress-free: Report. The Hindu Business Line. Retrieved May22, 2020, from https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/real-estate/about-58-billion-of-total-loan-advances-to-indian-realty-sector-completely-stress-free-anarock-capital/article30135722.ece
51.
ValipourH., & KhoramA. (2010). Effectiveness of corporate governance mechanisms to reduce agency cost. Journal of Management Accounting, 4(8), 61–75.
52.
WangG. (2010). The impacts of free cash flows and agency costs on firm performance. Journal of Service Science and Management, 3(4), 408–418.
53.
XuM., & GaoY. (2017, August14). Research about the impact of debt financing on real estate listed corporations’ financial performance. ASCE Library. Retrieved November23, 2019, from https://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/9780784480274.119
54.
ZhangH., & LiS. (2008). The impact of capital structure on agency costs: Evidence from UK public companies (Paper presentation). 16th Annual Conference on Pacific Basin Finance, Economics, Accounting and Management, Brisbane, Australia.
