On the basis of technology acceptance model (TAM) and decomposed theory of planned behaviour (DTPB), the present study is aimed at studying customer satisfaction in online banking in India. Data collected from 750 respondents from both public and private sector banks were used to test the mediated model using the hierarchical regression. The results supported that perceived usefulness acted as a partial mediator in the relationship between various independent variables, such as awareness of online banking services, security, knowledge of Internet, self-efficacy, intention to adopt, trust, easy to use, and dependent variable, that is, customer satisfaction. Implications for research and practising managers are discussed.
AikenL. S., & WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
2.
AjzenI. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
3.
Al-ShomaliS. A., GholamiR., & CleggB. (2008). Internet banking acceptance in the context of developing countries: An extension of the technology acceptance model. European Conference on Management of Technology, Nice, France.
4.
BagozziR. P. (1981). Attitudes, intentions and behaviour: A test of some key hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(4), 607–627.
5.
BagozziR., DavisFred & WarshawP. (1992). Development and Test of a Theory of Technological Learning and Usage. Human Relations, 45(7), 659–686.
6.
BharadwajS. G., & MitraD. (2016). Customer satisfaction and long-term stock returns. Journal of Marketing, 80, 116–121.
7.
BotelhoD. (2007). Consumer behaviour on the internet: Trust and perception of security control in the Brazilian context. Conference Proceedings American Marketing Association, 18, 174–189.
8.
BoyesG., & StoneM. (2003). E-business opportunities in financial services. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 8(2), 176–189.
9.
CasalóL. V., FlaviánC., & GuinalíuM. (2007). The role of security, privacy, usability and reputation in the development of online banking. Online Information Review, 31(5), 583–603.
10.
ChanS., & LuM. (2004). Understanding internet banking adoption and use behaviour: A Hong Kong perspective. Journal of Global Information Management, 12(3), 21–43.
11.
ChauP. Y. K., & HuP. J. H. (2002). Investigating healthcare professionals’ decisions to accept telemedicine technology: An empirical test of competing theories. Information and Management, 39(4), 297–311.
12.
ChenT. Y. (1999). Critical success factors for various strategies in the banking industry. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 17(2), 83–91.
13.
ChiemekeS. C., EvwiekpaefeA., & CheteF. (2006). The adoption of internet banking in Nigeria: An empirical investigation. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 11(3), 1–10.
14.
ChuaE. K. (1980). Consumer intention to deposit at banks: An empirical investigation of its relationship with attitude, normative belief and confidence, academic exercise. Faculty of Business Administration, National University of Singapore.
15.
CompeauD. R., & HigginsC. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189–211.
16.
DavisF. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
17.
DavisF. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
18.
DavisF. D., BagozziR. P., & WarshawP. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 318–339.
19.
ErikssonK., KeremK., & NilssonD. (2005). Customer acceptance of internet banking in Estonia. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 23(2/3), 200–216.
20.
FishbeinM., & AjzenI. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
21.
GerrardP., & CunninghamJ. B. (2003). The diffusion of internet banking among Singapore consumers. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 21(1), 16–28.
22.
HasanI., MaccarioA., & ZazzaraC. (2002). Do internet activities add value? The Italian bank experience (Working Paper). Berkley Research Center, New York University.
23.
HeringtonC., & WeavenS. (2007). Can banks improve customer relationships with high quality online services?Managing Service Quality, 17(4), 404–427.
24.
HillT., SmithN. D., & MannM. F. (1986). Communicating innovations: Convincing computer phobics to adopt innovative technologies. Advances in Consumer Research, 13, 419–422.
25.
JayawardhenaC., & FoleyP. (2000). Changes in the banking sector: The case of internet banking in the UK. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 10(1), 19–30.
26.
JosephM., McClureB. & JosephB. (1999). Service quality in the banking sector: The impact of technology on service delivery. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 17(4), 182–191.
27.
KannabiranG., & NarayanP. C. (2005). Deploying internet banking and e-commerce: Case study of a private sector bank in India. Information Technology for Development, 11(4), 363–379.
28.
KapoorK. K., DwivediY. K., & WilliamsM. D. (2015). IRCTC mobile ticketing adoption in an Indian context. International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, 11(2), 155–183.
29.
KarjaluotoH., MattilaM., & PentoT. (2002). Electronic banking in Finland: Consumer beliefs and reactions to a new delivery channel. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 6(4), 346–361.
30.
KennedyP. (1979). A guide to econometrics. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
31.
KhalilM. N., & PearsonJ. M. (2007). The influence of trust on internet banking acceptance. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 12(2), 1–10.
32.
KoltzschG. (2006). Innovative methods to enhance transaction security of banking applications. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 7(4), 243–249.
33.
KumarV. (2016). Introduction: Is customer satisfaction (Ir)relevant as a metric?Journal of Marketing, 80(5), 108–109.
34.
LeeY., & KozarK. (2008). An empirical investigation of anti-spyware software adoption: A multi-theoretical perspective. Information Management, 45(2), 109–119.
35.
LiaoZ., & CheungM. T. (2002). Internet based e-banking and consumer attitudes: An empirical study. Information and Management, 39(4), 283–295.
36.
LingM. G., LimS. F., TanK. B., & HuatS. (2016). Understanding customer satisfaction of internet banking: A case study in Malacca. Procedia Economics and Finance, 37(1), 80–85.
37.
LuS. C., LaiK. H., & ChengT. C. E. (2006). Adoption of internet service in linier shipping: An empirical study of shippers in Taiwan. Transport Reviews, 26(2), 189–206.
38.
MalhotraP., & SinghB. (2009). The impact of internet banking on bank performance and risk: The Indian experience. Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics, 2(4), 43–62.
39.
MasrekM. N., SyafiqM., HalimA., KhanA., & RamliI. (2018). The impact of perceived credibility and perceived quality on trust and satisfaction in mobile banking context. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 8(7), 1013–1025.
40.
MohanH., AhmadN., KongQ. C., YewC. T., LiewJ., KamariahN., & MatN. (2013). Determinants of the internet banking intention in Malaysia. American Journal of Economics, 3(3), 149–152.
41.
MolsN. P. (2000). The internet and services marketing: The case of Danish retail banking. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 10(1), 7–18.
42.
PatelH., & PithadiaV. (2013). Emerging trends in customer satisfaction of value added services in selected banks at Mehsana District of Gujarat. International Monthly Refereed Journal of Research in Management & Technology, 3. Retrieved from www.abhinavjournal.com
43.
PikkarainenT., PikkarainenK., KarjaluotoH., & PahnilaS. (2004). Consumer acceptance of online banking: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Internet Research, 14(3), 224–235.
44.
PolatogluV. N., & EkinS. (2001). An empirical investigation of the Turkish consumers’ acceptance of internet banking services. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 19(4), 156–165.
45.
PrompattanapakdeeS. (2009). The adoption and use of personal internet banking services in Thailand. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 37(6), 1–31.
46.
RobinsonT. (2000). Internet banking: Still not a perfect marriage. Information Week, 17(4), 104–106.
47.
SangS., LeeJ.-D, & LeeJ. (2009). E-government adoption in ASEAN: The case of Cambodia. Internet Research, 19(5), 517–534.
48.
SathyeM. (1997). Internet banking in Australia. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 2(4), 1–2.
49.
SawantB. S. (2011). Technological developments in Indian banking sector. Indian Streams Research Journal, 1(9), 1–4.
50.
ShahA. (2011). Factors influencing online banking customer satisfaction and their importance in improving overall retention levels: An Indian banking perspective. Information and Knowledge Management, 1(1), 45–54.
SmithA. D. (2006). Aspects of strategic forces affecting online banking. Services Marketing Quarterly, 28(2), 79–97.
54.
SrivastavaR. K. (2007). Customer’s perception on usage of internet banking. Innovative Marketing, 3(4), 67–77.
55.
SuhB., & HanI. (2002). Effect of trust on customer acceptance of internet banking. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 1(3), 247–263.
56.
SureshchandarG. S., RajendranC., & AnantharamanR. N. (2002). The relationship between service quality and customer satisfaction: A factor specific approach. Journal of Service Marketing, 16(4), 363–379.
57.
TalukderA. K. (2018). Effect of perceived service quality of commercial banks on customer satisfaction. International Journal of Management, Technology and Engineering, 8(12), 593–602.
58.
TanM., & TeoT. S. H. (2000). Factors influencing the adoption of internet banking. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 1(1), 1–42.
59.
TaylorS., & ToddP. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144–176.
60.
TornatzkyL. G., & KleinK. J. (1982). Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 29(1), 28–43.
61.
TriandisH. C. (1977). Interpersonal behaviour. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole, Monterey.
62.
TseD. K., & WiltonP. C. (1988). Models of customer satisfaction formation: An extension. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(2), 204–212.
63.
TuchilaR. (2000). Servicii bancare prin internet. E-finance Romania, 3(3), 23.
64.
VijM. (2003). The new world of banking a paradigm shift. Journal of Management Research, 3(3), 139.
65.
VimalaV. (2016). An evaluative study on internet banking security among selected Indian Bank customers. Amity Journal of Management Research, 1(1), 63–79.
66.
WalkerR. H., & JohnsonL. W. (2005). Towards understanding attitudes of consumers who use internet banking services. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 10(1), 84–94.
67.
WangY., WangY., LinH., & TangT. (2003). Determinants of user acceptance of internet banking: An empirical study. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 14(5), 501–519.
68.
YousafzaiS. Y., FoxallG. R., & PallisterJ. G. (2009). Multi-dimensional role of trust in internet banking adoption. The Service Industry Journal, 29(5), 591–605.
