This article presents a communication-appropriation perspective for examining knowledge transfer behaviours of workers. The proposed theoretical perspective is stemmed from the knowledge-as-power phenomenon and the knowledge transfer dilemma of workers, which argue that knowledge transfer may not represent the best option of workers due to the worries of losing knowledge appropriability and organisational power. Based on such psychological tension of workers, the communication-appropriation perspective advocates that workers may manipulate the mode of communication (codification and personalisation) in the knowledge transfer process as a responsive strategy to their appropriation threats so as to result in an incomplete transfer of knowledge. The present work differs from past research in its emphasis on the workers’ perspective of knowledge transfer management which has been relatively under-researched as compared to the organisation’s. The developed theoretical perspective is able to enhance our understanding of the influences of power struggles and appropriation concerns on the knowledge transfer behaviours and strategies of workers.
AlvessonM.KarremanD. (2001). Odd couple making sense of the curious concept of knowledge management. Journal of Management Studies, 38(7), 995–1018.
2.
BerendsH. (2005). Exploring knowledge sharing: Moves, problem solving and justification. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 3, 97–105.
3.
BjorkmanI.Barner-RasmussenW.LiL. (2004). Managing knowledge transfer in MNCs: The impact of headquarters control mechanisms. Journal of International Business Studies, 35, 443–455.
4.
BockG. W.KimY. (2002). Breaking the myths of rewards: An exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing. Information Resources Management Journal, 15(2), 14–21.
5.
BowmanC.SwartJ. (2007). Whose human capital? The challenge of value capture when capital is embedded. Journal of Management Studies, 44(4), 488–505.
6.
CabreraA.CabreraE. F. (2002). Knowledge sharing dilemmas. Organization Studies, 23(5), 687–710.
7.
CacciatoriE.TamoschusD.GrabherG. (2011). Knowledge transfer across projects: Codification in creative, high-tech and engineering industries. Management Learning, 43(3), 309–331.
8.
CoffR. W. (1999). When competitive advantage doesn’t lead to performance: The resource-based view and stakeholder bargaining power. Organization Science, 10(2), 119–133.
9.
ContuA. (in press). On boundaries and difference: Communities of practice and power relations in creative work. Management Learning, DOI: 10.1177/1350507612471926.
10.
DaftR. L.LengelR. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571.
11.
DaftR. L.WeickK. E. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 284–296.
12.
DavenportT. H. (1997). Information ecology. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
13.
DavenportT. H.PrusakL. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations management what they know. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
14.
DreyfusH. L.DreyfusS. E. (2005). Expertise in real world contexts. Organization Studies, 26(5), 779–792.
15.
Easterby-SmithM.LylesM. A.TsangE. W. K. (2008). Inter-organizational knowledge transfer: Current themes and future prospects. Journal of Management Studies, 45(4), 677–690.
16.
FelinT.HesterlyW. S. (2007). The knowledge-based view, nested heterogeneity, and new value creation: Philosophical considerations on the locus on knowledge. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 195–218.
17.
FossN. J.PedersenT. (2002). Transferring knowledge in MNCs: The role of sources of subsidiary knowledge and organizational context. Journal of International Management, 8(1), 49–67.
18.
FossN. J.HustedK.MichailovaS. (2010). Governing knowledge sharing in organizations: Levels of analysis, governance mechanisms, and research directions. Journal of Management Studies, 47(3), 455–482.
19.
FoucaultM. (1980). Power/Knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books.
20.
GrantR. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109–122.
21.
GuptaA. K.GovindarajanV. (2000). Knowledge management’s social dimension: Lessons from Nucor Steel. Sloan Management Review, 42(1), 71–80.
22.
HaasM. R.HansenM. T. (2007). Different knowledge, different benefits: Toward a productivity perspective on knowledge sharing in organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1133–1153.
23.
HansenM. T.NohriaN.TierneyT. (1999). What’s your strategy for managing knowledge?Harvard Business Review, 77(2), 106–116.
24.
HeizmannH. (2011). Knowledge sharing in a dispersed network of HR practice: Zooming in on power/knowledge struggles. Management Learning, 42(4), 379–393.
25.
Hurmelinna-LaukkanenP.PuumalainenK. (2007). Nature and dynamics of appropriability: Strategies for appropriating returns on innovation. R&D Management, 37(2), 95–112.
InkpenA. C.DinurA. (1998). Knowledge management processes and international joint ventures. Organization Science, 9(4), 454–468.
28.
JarvenpaaS. L.StaplesD. S. (2001). Exploring perceptions of organizational ownership of information and expertise. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 151–183.
29.
KamocheK. (2006). Managing people in turbulent economic times: A knowledge-creation and appropriation perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 44(1), 25–45.
30.
KamocheK.MaguireK. (2010). Pit sense: Appropriation of practice-based knowledge in a UK coalmine. Human Relations, 64(5), 725–744.
31.
KamocheK.PangM.WongA. L. Y. (2011). Career development and knowledge appropriation: A genealogical critique. Organization Studies, 32(12), 1665–1679.
32.
KauppilaO-P.RajalaR.JyrämäA. (2011). Knowledge sharing through virtual teams across borders and boundaries. Management Learning, 42(4), 395–418.
33.
LeeD.AhnJ. (2005). Rewarding knowledge sharing under measurement inaccuracy. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 3, 229–243.
34.
LeeP.GillespieN.MannL.WearingA. (2010). Leadership and trust: Their effect on knowledge sharing and team performance. Management Learning, 41(4), 473–491.
35.
LinC. (2007). To share or not to share: Modeling tacit knowledge sharing, its mediators and antecedents. Journal of Business Ethics, 70, 411–428.
36.
MørkB. E.HoholmT.EllingsenG.EdwinB.AanestadM. (2010). Challenging expertise: On power relations within and across communities of practice in medical innovation. Management Learning, 41(5), 575–592.
37.
MudambiR.NavarraP. (2004). Is knowledge power? Knowledge flows, subsidiary power and rent-seeking within MNCs. Journal of International Business Studies, 35, 385–406.
38.
MuellerF.DyersonR. (1999). Expert humans or expert organizations?Organization Studies, 20(2), 225–256.
39.
NickersonJ. A.ZengerT. R. (2004). A knowledge-based theory of the firm—The problem-solving perspective. Organization Science, 15(6), 617–632.
40.
NonakaI.TakeuchiH. (1995). The knowledge creating company. Oxford: OUP.
41.
PfefferJ. (1981). Power in organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
42.
PolanyiM. (1967). The tacit dimension. N. Y. Anchor Books: Garden City.
43.
QuigleyN. R.TeslukP. E.LockeE. A.BartolK. M. (2007). A multilevel investigation of the motivational mechanisms underlying knowledge sharing and performance. Organization Science, 18(1), 71–88.
44.
ReedR.DeFillippiR. J. (1990). Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 88–102.
45.
RivkinJ. W. (2001). Reproducing knowledge: Replication without imitation at moderate complexity. Organization Science, 12(3), 274–293.
46.
SchwartzD. G. (2007). Integrating knowledge transfer and computer-mediated communication: Categorizing barriers and possible responses. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 5, 249–259.
47.
ShannonC. E.WeaverW. (1949). A mathematical model of communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
48.
SimoninB. L. (1999). Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 595–623.
49.
SnyderJ.Lee-PatridgeJ. E. (2013). Understanding communication channel choices in team knowledge sharing. Corporate Communication: An International Journal, 18(4), 1–26.
50.
SwapW.LeonardD.ShieldsM.AbramsL. (2001). Using mentoring and storytelling to transfer knowledge in the workplace. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 95–114.
51.
SzulanskiG. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 27–43.
52.
Van WijkR.JansenJ. J. P.LylesM. A. (2008). Inter- and intra-organizational knowledge transfer: A meta-analytic review of assessment of its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Management Studies, 45(4), 830–853.
53.
WilkesmannU.WilkesmannM.VirgillitoA. (2009). The absence of cooperation is not necessarily defection: Structural and motivational constraints of knowledge transfer in a social dilemma situation. Organization Studies, 30(10), 1141–1164.
54.
ZanderU.KogutB. (1995). Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organization Science, 6(1), 76–92.
