To compare closed intramedullary nailing to open reduction and internal fixation using a fixed angle blade plate for the management of subtrochanteric femoral fractures.
Methods.
58 patients were equally randomised to undergo either an intramedullary nailing (IN) or fixed angle blade plating (BP).
Results.
There were no significant differences between the 2 groups with regard to age, time to surgery, operating time, receipt of blood transfusions, duration of hospital stay, or fracture classification. The revision rate was 28% (8/29) in the BP group and none in the IN group; the difference was statistically significant.
Conclusion.
Internal fixation using a fixed angle blade plate for subtrochanteric femoral fractures has higher implant failure and revision rates, compared to closed intramedullary nailing.
SofieldHA. Anatomy of medullary canals. Instr Course Lect1951;8:8–10.
8.
KochJC. The laws of bone architecture. Am J Anat1917;21:177.
9.
RybickiEFSimonenFAWeisEBJr. On the mathematical analysis of stress in the human femur. J Biomech1972;5:203–15.
10.
KinastCBolhofnerBRMastJWGanzR. Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. Results of treatment with the 95 degrees condylar blade-plate. Clin Orthop Relat Res1989;238:122–30.
11.
WaddellJP. Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur: A review of 130 patients. J Trauma1979;19:582–92.
12.
WatsonHKCampbellRDJrWadePA. Classification, treatment and complications of the adult subtrochanteric fracture. J Trauma1964;60:457–80.
13.
AsherMATippettJWRockwoodCAZilberS. Compression fixation of subtrochanteric fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res1976;117:202–8.
14.
SchatzkerJ. Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. In: SchatzkerJTileM, editors. The rationale of operative fracture care. 2nd ed.Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1996:387–413.
15.
WhatleyJRGarlandDEWhitecloudT3rdWhickstromJ. Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur: Treatment with ASIF blade plate fixation. South Med J1978;71:1372–5.
16.
BarquetAFrancescoliLRienziDLopezL. Intertrochanteric-subtrochanteric fractures: Treatment with the long Gamma nail. J Orthop Trauma2000;14:324–8.
17.
LahoudJCAsselineauASalengroSMolinaVBombartM. Subtrochanteric fractures. A comparative study between gamma nail and angular osteosynthesis with lateral cortical support [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot1997;83:335–42.
18.
van DoornRStapertJW. The long gamma nail in the treatment of 329 subtrochanteric fractures with major extension into the femoral shaft. Eur J Surg2000;166:240–6.
19.
WinquistRA. Locked femoral nailing. J Am Acad Orthop Surg1993;1:95–105.
20.
PughKJMorganRAGorczycaJTPienkowskiD. A mechanical comparison of subtrochanteric femur fracture fixation. J Orthop Trauma1998;12:324–9.
21.
WareJEJr. SF-36 health survey manual: Appendix C. SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide. Boston: Nimrod Press; 1993.
22.
MalkawiH. Bone grafting in subtrochanteric fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res1982;168:69–72.
23.
HardyDCDescampsPYKrallisPFabeckLSmetsPBertensCL. Use of an intramedullary hip-screw compared with a compression hip-screw with a plate for intertrochanteric femoral fractures. A prospective, randomized study of one hundred patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am1998;80:618–30.
24.
BridleSHPatelADBircherMCalvertPT. Fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. A randomised prospective comparison of the gamma nail and the dynamic hip screw. J Bone Joint Surg Br1991;73:330–4.
25.
SadowskiCLubbekeASaudanMRiandNSternRHoffmeyerP. Treatment of reverse oblique and transverse intertrochanteric fractures with use of an intramedullary nail or a 95 degrees screw-plate: A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am2002;84:372–81.
