PowellLEAndersenESPozezAL. Assessing readability of patient education materials on breast reconstruction by major US academic hospitals as compared with nonacademic sites. Ann Plast Surg. 2021;86(6):610‐614. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000002575
FowlerGEBakerDMLeeMJBrownSR. A systematic review of online resources to support patient decision-making for full-thickness rectal prolapse surgery. Tech Coloproctol. 2017;21(11):853‐862. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-017-1708-7
6.
AyyaswamiVPadmanabhanDPatelM, et al.A readability analysis of online cardiovascular disease-related health education materials. Health Lit Res Pract. 2019;3(2):74-80. doi:https://doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20190306-03
7.
BompastoreNJCisuTHolochP. Separating the wheat from the chaff: An evaluation of readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information for treatment of Peyronie disease. Urology. 2018;118:59‐64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2018.02.054
8.
AmanteDJHoganTPPagotoSLEnglishTMLapaneKL. Access to care and use of the internet to search for health information: results from the US national health interview survey. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(4):e106. doi:https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4126
9.
Davis TerryCHancockJMorrisJ, et al.Impact of health literacy-directed colonoscopy bowel preparation instruction sheet. Am J Health Behav. 2017;41(3):301‐308. doi:https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.41.3.9
10.
MankaMGViersBRBoleR, et al.Assessing the impact of hospital dismissal summary readability on patient outcomes following prostatectomy. Urology. 2021;157:201‐205. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2021.06.040
11.
StaynovaRAGueorguievSRPetkova-GueorguievaES, et al.Written health education materials for women with gestational diabetes mellitus—evaluation of usefulness and patients’ satisfaction. Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2019;61(1):127‐133. doi:https://doi.org/10.2478/folmed-2018-0041
