Background: The reverse sural fasciocutaneous flap (RSFCF) has been used with success to cover noncomplicated foot and ankle soft tissue defects. However, there are some controversies when it is used in patients having chronic diabetic foot ulcers. This aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of RSFCF in covering diabetic foot and ankle ulcers. Methods: A systematic review was undertaken from MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Only diabetic foot and ankle ulcers were accepted for inclusion and all study designs were included. Proximally based flaps, nondiabetic ulcers, and assisted negative pressure therapy were excluded. Suitability for inclusion was assessed by 2 reviewers. The random-effect estimate was reported for the set outcomes whenever high heterogeneity was present. Metaregression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for failure. Results: The search identified 33 relevant studies comprising 187 patients and flap interventions; all but 1 were case-series. The weighted outcomes were as follows: (1) the flap healing rate was 93.3% while 6.6% resulted in total necrosis, (2) the rate of partial flap necrosis was 12%, (3) venous congestion was reported in 6.6% of cases, (4) the infection rate was 8.3%, and (5) the donor site morbidity was 4.6%. No association was found between pedicle width or presence of a subcutaneous pedicle tunnel and the primary outcome of total loss. Conclusions: This review demonstrated excellent results of the flap when covering complicated or large diabetic foot and ankle ulcers. When compared to those published in the literature, our results found RSFCF to be relatively less successful in diabetic wounds than in trauma patients but more successful than in those having associated osteomyelitis and those who were treated with random local flaps.
MasqueletACRomanaMCWolfG. Skin island flaps supplied by the vascular axis of the sensitive superficial nerves: anatomic study and clinical experience in the leg. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;89(6):1115–1121.
2.
FollmarKEBaccaraniABaumeisterSPLevinLSErdmannD. The distally based sural flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119(6):138e–148e.
3.
AokiSTanumaKIwakiriI, et al.Clinical and vascular anatomical study of distally based sural flap. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;61(1):73–78.
4.
ZhangFLinSSongYZhangGZhengH. Distally based sural neuro-lesser saphenous veno-fasciocutaneous compound flap with a low rotation point: microdissection and clinical application. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;62(4):395–404.
5.
WhetzelTPBarnardMAStokesRB. Arterial fasciocutaneous vascular territories of the lower leg. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;100(5):1172–1183.
6.
ParcellsALKeithJGranickM.Reverse sural artery flap. In: TranTAPanthakiZJHoballahJJThallerSR, eds. Operative Dictations in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Springer; 2017:521–523.
7.
HuisingaRLHouptPDijkstraRvan LeeuwenJBS. The distally based sural artery flap. Ann Plast Surg. 1998;41:58–65.
8.
FollmarKEErdmannD. Reversed sural artery flap. In: PuLLQLevineJPWeiFC, eds. Reconstructive Surgery of the Lower Extremity. Vol 1. Quality Medical; 2013:665–679.
9.
de BlacamCColakogluSOgunleyeAA, et al.Risk factors associated with complications in lower-extremity reconstruction with the distally based sural flap: a systematic review and pooled analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014;67(5):607–616.
10.
TanOAtikBBekereciogluM. Supercharged reverse-flow sural flap: a new modification increasing the reliability of the flap. Microsurgery. 2005;25(1):36–43.
11.
DaarDAbdouSDavidJKirbyDWilsonSSaadehP. Revisiting the reverse sural artery flap in distal lower extremity reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2020;84(4):463–470.
12.
BaumeisterSPSpiererRErdmannDSweisRLevinLSGermannGK. A realistic complication analysis of 70 sural artery flaps in a multimorbid patient group. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112(1):129–140.
13.
ParrettBMPribazJJMatrosEPrzyleckiWSampsonCEOrgillDP. Risk analysis for the reverse sural fasciocutaneous flap in distal leg reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123(5):1499–1504.
14.
DhamangaonkarACPatankarHS. Reverse sural fasciocutaneous flap with a cutaneous pedicle to cover distal lower limb soft tissue defects: experience of 109 clinical cases. J Orthop Traumatol. 2014;15(3):225–229.
15.
AssiCSamahaCChamoun MoussaMHayekTYammineK. A comparative study of the reverse sural fascio-cutaneous flap outcomes in the management of foot and ankle soft tissue defects in diabetic and trauma patients. Foot Ankle Spec. 2019;12(5):432–438.
16.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJAltmanDG; The PRISMA group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
17.
MoolaSMunnZTufanaruC, et al.Chapter 7: systematic reviews of etiology and risk. In: AromatarisEMunnZ, eds. Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer’s Manual. The Joanna Briggs Institute, 2017. https://reviewersmanual.joannabriggs.org/
18.
RajacicNDarweeshMJayakrishnanKGangRKJojicS. The distally based superficial sural flap for reconstruction of the lower leg and foot. Br J Plast Surg. 1996;49(6):383–389.
19.
JengSFWeiFC. Distally based sural island flap for foot and ankle reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99(3):744–750.
20.
IsenbergJS. The reversal sural artery neurocutaneous island flap in composite lower extremity wound reconstruction. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2000;39(1):44–48.
21.
Costa-FerreiraAReisJPinhoCMartinsAAmaranteJ. The distally based island superficial sural artery flap: clinical experience with 36 flaps. Ann Plast Surg. 2001;46(3):308–313.
22.
YildirimSAkanMAközT. Soft-tissue reconstruction of the foot with distally based neurocutaneous flaps in diabetic patients. Ann Plast Surg. 2002;48(3):258–264.
23.
YildirimSGideroğluKAközT. The simple and effective choice for treatment of chronic calcaneal osteomyelitis: neurocutaneous flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111(2):753–760.
24.
JollyGPZgonisT. Soft tissue reconstruction of the foot with a reverse flow sural artery neurofasciocutaneous flap. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2004;50(6):44–49.
25.
RaveendranSSPereraDHappuharachchiTYoganathanV. Superficial sural artery flap--a study in 40 cases. Br J Plast Surg. 2004;57(3):266–269.
26.
ChenSLChenTMChouTDChangSCWangHJ. Distally based sural fasciomusculocutaneous flap for chronic calcaneal osteomyelitis in diabetic patients. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;54(1):44–48.
27.
TosunZOzkanAKaraçorZSavaciN. Delaying the reverse sural flap provides predictable results for complicated wounds in diabetic foot. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;55(2):169–173.
28.
AkhtarSHameedA. Versatility of the sural fasciocutaneous flap in the coverage of lower third leg and hind foot defects. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59(8):839–845.
29.
ChenSLChenTMWangHJ. The distally based sural fasciomusculocutaneous flap for foot reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59(8):846–855.
El-ShazlyMYassinO. Increasing the success rate of the reversed-flow fasciocutaneous island sural flap: a clinical experience in 26 cases. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;57(6):653–657.
32.
FodorLHoreshZLernerARamonYPeledIJUllmannY. The distally based sural musculoneurocutaneous flap for treatment of distal tibial osteomyelitis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119(7):2127–2136.
33.
MiletoDCotrufoSCucciaG, et al.The distally based sural flap for lower leg reconstruction: versatility in patients with associated morbidity. Ann Ital Chir. 2007;78(4):323–327.
34.
AhmedSKFungBKIpWYFokMChowSP. The versatile reverse flow sural artery neurocutaneous flap: a case series and review of literature. J Orthop Surg Res. 2008;3:15.
35.
FraccalvieriMBogettiPVernaGCarlucciSFavaRBruschiS. Distally based fasciocutaneous sural flap for foot reconstruction: a retrospective review of 10 years experience. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29(2):191–198.
36.
IgnatiadisIATsiampaVAGalanakosSP, et al.The reverse sural fasciocutaneous flap for the treatment of traumatic, infectious or diabetic foot and ankle wounds: a retrospective review of 16 patients. Diabet Foot Ankle. 2011;2. doi: 10.3402/dfa.v2i0.5653.
37.
KoseRMordenizCŞanliÇ. Use of expanded reverse sural artery flap in lower extremity reconstruction. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2011;50(6):695–698.
38.
ParkJSRohSGLeeNHYangKM. Versatility of the distally-based sural artery fasciocutaneous flap on the lower leg and foot in patients with chronic disease. Arch Plast Surg. 2013;40(3):220–225.
39.
SonmezESilistireliÖKKaraaslanÖKamburoğluHOSafakT. Enhancement of venous drainage with vein stripper for reversed pedicled neurocutaneous flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2013;29(4):249–254.
40.
CheemaSAMalikALAsimM. Role of reverse sural artery flap for soft tissue defects of lower limb: experience with 66 cases. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2014;26(4):423–427.
41.
YusofNMFadzliASAzmanWSAzrilMA. Acute vascular complications (flap necrosis and congestion) with one stage and two stage distally based sural flap for wound coverage around the ankle. Med J Malaysia. 2016;71(2):47–52.
42.
YousafMAAbidinZUKhalidK, et al.Extended islanded reverse sural artery flap for staged reconstruction of foot defects proximal to toes. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2018;28(2):126–128.
43.
ChiZChenYChuT, et al.Distally based sural neuro-fasciocutaneous perforator flap for foot and ankle reconstruction: surgical modifications for flap pedicle and donor site closure without skin graft. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018;71(2):224–231.
44.
SalloomiHHTAljuburiDJAlhakeemIHIAlarudhyRK. Reconstruction of the foot and lower leg defects by reverse sural flap. SAS J Surg. 2018;4(11):247–255.
45.
AliHAdilFIdreesF. Reverse flow sural flap; a versatile method for the management of soft tissue defects of dorsum of foot, ankle and heel. Professional Med J. 2019;26(1):7–13.
46.
PatilBRWahegaonkarCAgarkhedkarNDograBB. Extended reverse sural artery pedicle flap: a versatile and reproducible option for coverage of ankle and foot defects. Int J Res Med Sci. 2019;7(3):866–870.
47.
SatyapalSK. Study of versatility of reverse sural fasciocutaneous flap for reconstruction of lower third leg defect. Int J Med Health Res. 2019;5(2):112–119.
48.
DaarDAAbdouSADavidJAKirbyDJWilsonSCSaadehPB. Revisiting the reverse sural artery flap in distal lower extremity reconstruction: a systematic review and risk analysis. Ann Plast Surg. 2019; 84:463–470. doi:10.1097/SAP.0000000000002041
49.
PersaudSChesserAPereiraRRossA. Sural flap use for the treatment of wounds with underlying osteomyelitis: graft size a predictor in outcome, a systematic review. Foot Ankle Spec. 2017;10(6):560–566.
50.
RamanujamCLZgonisT. Use of local flaps for soft-tissue closure in diabetic foot wounds: a systematic review. Foot Ankle Spec. 2019;12(3):286–293.
51.
AssiCFawazWSamahaCChamounMYammineK. Sural neuro-cutaneous flap in the management of foot and ankle soft tissue defects in a diabetic population. J Med Liban. 2016;64(3):164–167.
52.
Fitzgerald O’ConnorEJVeselyMHoltPJJonesKGThompsonMMHinchliffeRJ. A systematic review of free tissue transfer in the management of non-traumatic lower extremity wounds in patients with diabetes. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;41(3):391–399.
