A sample of 204 British participants completed a questionnaire that assessed their attitude toward cosmetic surgery as well as measures of self-esteem, life satisfaction, self-rated physical attractiveness, religiosity and media consumption. Two factors emerged from a factor analysis of their attitudes toward surgery: likelihood to undergo, and benefits of undergoing, cosmetic surgery. Females with low self-esteem, low life satisfaction, low self-rated attractiveness and little religious beliefs who were heavy television watchers reported a greater likelihood of undergoing cosmetic surgery. Stepwise regression analysis with the two attitude factors as criterion variables showed two major predictors for likelihood: religiousness and low self-esteem, and four major predictors for benefit: religousness, media consumption, life satisfaction and sex. The role of religion is considered in this context.
SwamiV. The influence of body weight and shape in determining female and male physical attractiveness. In: KindesMV ed. Body Image: New Research.New York: Nova Biomedical Books, 2006: 33–61.
2.
SwamiV. Perceptions of female body weight and shape among indigenous and urban Europeans.Scand J Psychol2007; 48: 43–50.
3.
SwamiVFurnhamA. The Psychology of Physical Attraction.London: Routledge, 2008.
4.
LangloisJHKalakanisLERubensteinAJLarsonADHallamMJSmootMT. Maxims and myths of beauty: A meta-analytic and theoretic review.Psychol Bull2000; 126: 390–423.
5.
BrownAFurnhamAGlanvilleLSwamiV. Factors that affect the likelihood of undergoing cosmetic surgery.Aesthet Surg J2007; 27: 501–8.
6.
SwamiVArtecheAChamorro-PremuzicT. Looking good: Factors affecting the likelihood of having cosmetic surgery.Eur J Plast Surg2008; 30: 211–18.
7.
SwamiVChamorro-PremuzicTBridgesSFurnhamA. Acceptance of cosmetic surgery: Personality and individual difference predictors.Body Image2009; 6: 7–13.
8.
American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery,. Quick facts: Highlights of the ASAPS 2007 statistics on cosmetics surgery. <www.surgery.org/media/statistics> (Accessed May 2009).
SarwerDBMageeLClarkV. What is beauty? Physical appearance and cosmetic medical treatments: Physiological and sociocultural influences.J Cosmet Dermatol2003; 2: 29–39.
11.
EdmondsA. ‘The poor have the right to be beautiful’: Cosmetic surgery in neoliberal Brazil.J R Anthropol Inst2007; 13: 363–81.
12.
CookSRosserRSalmonP. Is cosmetic surgery an effective psychotherapeutic intervention? A systematic review of the evidence.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg2006; 59: 1133–51.
13.
DelinskySS. Cosmetic surgery: A common and accepted form of self improvement?J Appl Soc Psychol2005; 35: 2012–28.
14.
DidieESarwerD. Factors that influence the decision to undergo cosmetic breast augmentation surgery.J Women's Health2003; 12: 241–53.
15.
SchofieldMHussainRLoxtonDMillerZ. Psychological and health behavioural covariates of cosmetic surgery.J Health Psychol2002; 7: 445–457.
16.
OzgurFTuncaliDGursuG. Life satisfaction, self-esteem, and body image.Aesthetic Plast Surg1998; 22: 412–19.
17.
ChingSThomaAMcCabeRAntonyM. Measuring outcomes in aesthetic surgery.Plast Reconstr Surg2003; 111: 468–80.
18.
MarkeyCMarkeyP. Correlates of young women's interest in obtaining cosmetic surgery.Sex Roles2009; 61: 158–66.
19.
TaitS. Television and the domestication of cosmetic surgery.Fem Med Stud2007; 7: 119–35.
20.
CrockettRJPruzinskyTPersingJA. The influence of plastic surgery ‘reality TV’ on cosmetic surgery patient expectations and decision making.Plast Reconstr Surg2007; 120: 316–24.
21.
CochranJKChamlinMBBeeghleyLHarndenABlackwellBS. Religious stability, endogamy, and the effects of personal religiosity on attitudes towards abortion.Sociol Relig1996; 57: 291–309.
22.
MeisenbergG. Designer babies on tap? Medical students’ attitudes to pre-implantation genetic screening.Public Underst Sci2009; 18: 149–66.
23.
WengerNS. Physicians’ religiosity and end-of-life care attitudes and behaviours.Mt Sinai J Med2004; 5: 335–43.
24.
RosenbergM. Society and the adolescent self-image.Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1965.
25.
SwamiVFurnhamAGeogiadesCPangL. Evaluating self and partner physical attractiveness.Body Image2007; 4: 97–101.
26.
WatkinsLMJohnstonL. Screening job applicants: The impact of physical attractiveness and application quality.Int J Select Assess2000; 8: 76–84.
27.
DipboyeRLFromkinHLWibackK. Relative importance of applicant sex, attractiveness and scholastic standing in evaluation of job applicant resumes.J Appl Psychol1975; 60: 39–43.
28.
The Holy Bible,. Revised Standard Version.Philadelphia: Westminster, 1952.
