Previously, the gold standard for the diagnosis of endometriosis involved the performance of laparoscopic surgery, which allows the visualization and histological examination of the endometrial tissue. According to the latest guidelines published by the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) in 2022, surgery is recommended only in patients with diagnostic difficulties associated with the use of non-invasive methods or in case of inappropriate or unsuccessful empirical treatment. At the same time, it is not recommended to use the measurement of biomarkers in the endometrial tissue, blood, menstrual or uterine fluids to diagnose endometriosis as the ESHRE guideline development group indicated the need of larger, multi-center prospective studies on this matter. The aim of this narrative review is to present advances in knowledge on non-invasive endometriosis diagnostic opportunities with emphasis on proteomics, the use of endometrial aspiration biopsy, iron metabolism, vitamin D-binding protein, extracellular matrix signaling pathways, epithelial−mesenchymal transformation, and other molecular pathways, together with a critical analysis of studies cited in the recent ESHRE guidelines.
StaalAHvan der ZandenMNapAW.Diagnostic delay of endometriosis in the Netherlands. Gynecol Obstet Invest2016; 81: 321–324.
2.
GhaiVJanHShakirF, et al. Diagnostic delay for superficial and deep endometriosis in the United Kingdom. J Obstet Gynaecol2020; 40: 83–89.
3.
SinghSSolimanAMRahalY, et al. Prevalence, symptomatic burden, and diagnosis of endometriosis in Canada: cross-sectional survey of 30 000 women. J Obstet Gynaecol Can2020; 42: 829–838.
4.
Le RouxAMcCallJPudwellJ, et al. Therapeutic journey of adolescents and young adults with severe dysmenorrhea and endometriosis. J Endometr Pelvic Pain Disord2022; 14: 183–191.
5.
BrownJFarquharC.Endometriosis: an overview of Cochrane Reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2014; 2014: CD009590.
KaramanYUsluH.Complications and their management in endometriosis surgery. Womens Health2015; 11: 685–692.
8.
YıldırımDTatarCDoğanO, et al. Post-cesarean scar endometriosis. Turk J Obstet Gynecol2018; 15: 33–38.
9.
SinghSSGudeKPerdeauxE, et al. Surgical outcomes in patients with endometriosis: a systematic review. J Obstet Gynaecol Can2020; 42: 881–888.e11.
10.
ChamiéLPRibeiroDMFRRibeiroGMPAR, et al. Postoperative imaging findings after laparoscopic surgery for deeply infiltrating endometriosis. Abdom Radiol2020; 45: 1847–1865.
11.
ConroyIMooneySSKavanaghS, et al. Pelvic pain: what are the symptoms and predictors for surgery, endometriosis and endometriosis severity. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol2021; 61: 765–772.
12.
BafortCBeebeejaunYTomassettiC, et al. Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2020; 10: CD011031.
13.
GadMSBadrouiMHH. Evidence-based therapy for infertility associated with early stage endometriosis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet2012; 119: S548.
14.
MoiniABaharLAshrafiniaM, et al. Fertility outcome after operative laparoscopy versus no treatment in infertile women with minimal or mild endometriosis. Int J Fertil Steril2012; 5: 235–240.
15.
KoninckxPRZupiEMartinDC.Endometriosis and pregnancy outcome. Fertil Steril2018; 110: 406–407.
16.
HealeyMAngWCChengC.Surgical treatment of endometriosis: a prospective randomized double-blinded trial comparing excision and ablation. Fertil Steril2010; 94: 2536–2540.
17.
LaudańskiPRogalskaGWarzechaD, et al. Autoantibody screening of plasma and peritoneal fluid of patients with endometriosis. Hum Reprod2023; 38: 629–643.
18.
ŻeberkiewiczMHycAIwanA, et al. Expression of fucosyltransferase 4 (FUT4) mRNA is increased in endometrium from women with endometriosis. J Clin Med2022; 11: 5606.
19.
HapangamaDKDruryJDa SilvaL, et al. Abnormally located SSEA1+/SOX9+ endometrial epithelial cells with a basalis-like phenotype in the eutopic functionalis layer may play a role in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Hum Reprod2019; 34: 56–68.
20.
HandaUBansalCAggarwalP, et al. Diagnostic utility of endometrial aspiration cytology in women with abnormal uterine bleeding. J Midlife Health2018; 9:140–144.
21.
Spadoto-DiasDBueloni-DiasFNEliasLV, et al. The value of hysteroscopic biopsy in the diagnosis of endometrial polyps. Womens Health2016; 12: 412–419.
22.
McMenaminMLysakova-DevineTWingfieldM, et al. Endometrial aspiration biopsy: a non-invasive method of obtaining functional lymphoid progenitor cells and mature natural killer cells. Reprod Biomed Online2012; 25: 322–328.
23.
TanSCYiapBC.DNA, RNA, and protein extraction: the past and the present. J Biomed Biotechnol2009; 2009: 574398.
24.
KukurbaKRMontgomerySB.RNA sequencing and analysis. Cold Spring Harb Protoc2015; 2015: 951–969.
25.
WirkaRCPjanicMQuertermousT.Advances in transcriptomics: investigating cardiovascular disease at unprecedented resolution. Circ Res2018; 122: 1200–1220.
26.
KisselHDPaulsonTGLiuK, et al. Feasibility of RNA and DNA extraction from fresh pipelle and archival endometrial tissues for use in gene expression and SNP arrays. Obstet Gynecol Int2013; 2013: 576842.
27.
PrašnikarEKunejTGorenjakM, et al. Transcriptomics of receptive endometrium in women with sonographic features of adenomyosis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol2022; 20: 2.
28.
HuangJQinHYangY, et al. A comparison of transcriptomic profiles in endometrium during window of implantation between women with unexplained recurrent implantation failure and recurrent miscarriage. Reproduction2017; 153: 749–758.
29.
RekkerKAltmäeSSuhorutshenkoM, et al. A two-cohort RNA-seq study reveals changes in endometrial and blood miRNome in fertile and infertile women. Genes2018; 9: 574.
30.
Van LangendoncktACasanas-RouxFDonnezJ. Iron overload in the peritoneal cavity of women with pelvic endometriosis. Fertil Steril2002; 78: 712–718.
31.
SkarżyńskaEWróbelMZborowskaH, et al. The influence of lactoferrin in plasma and peritoneal fluid on iron metabolism in women with endometriosis. Int J Mol Sci2023; 24: 1619.
32.
DefrèreSLousseJCGonzález-RamosR, et al. Potential involvement of iron in the pathogenesis of peritoneal endometriosis. Mol Hum Reprod2008; 14: 377–385.
33.
HwangJHWangTLeeKS, et al. Vitamin D binding protein plays an important role in the progression of endometriosis. Int J Mol Med2013; 32: 1394–1400.
34.
FranasiakJShapsesSSunW, et al. Vitamin D binding protein is lower in infertile patients compared to fertile controls: a case control study. Fertil Res Pract2017; 3: 14. DOI: 10.1186/s40738-017-0042-0
35.
BadrBCassimSRehmanR.Can low vitamin D binding protein levels be a cause of infertility in females?J Pak Med Assoc2019; 69: 1064.
36.
Lisowska-MyjakBSkarżyńskaEWróbelM, et al. Investigation of the changes in concentrations of vitamin D-binding protein and lactoferin in plasma and peritoneal fluid of patients with endometriosis. Int J Mol Sci2023; 24: 7828. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24097828
37.
CiebieraMEsfandyariSSibliniH, et al. Nutrition in gynecological diseases: current perspectives. Nutrients2021; 13: 1178.
38.
BéliardADonnezJNisolleM, et al. Localization of laminin, fibronectin, E-cadherin, and integrins in endometrium and endometriosis. Fertil Sterile1997; 67: 266–272.
39.
WarzechaDZałęckaJMańkaG, et al. Plasma and peritoneal fluid fibronectin and collagen iv levels as potential biomarkers of endometriosis. Int J Mol Sci2022; 23: 15669.
40.
ChrobakAGmyrekGBSozańskiR, et al. The influence of extracellular matrix proteins on T-cell proliferation and apoptosis in women with endometriosis or uterine leiomyoma. Am J Reprod Immunol2004; 51: 123–129.
41.
MatalliotakiCMatalliotakisMRahmiogluN, et al. Role of FN1 and GREB1 gene polymorphisms in endometriosis. Mol Med Rep2019; 20: 111–116.
42.
YangYMYangWX.Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in the development of endometriosis. Oncotarget2017; 8: 41679–41689.
43.
AlbertsenHMWardK.Genes linked to endometriosis by GWAS are integral to cytoskeleton regulation and suggests that mesothelial barrier homeostasis is a factor in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Reprod Sci2017; 24: 803–811.
44.
FuruyaMMasudaHHaraK, et al. ZEB1 expression is a potential indicator of invasive endometriosis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand2017; 96: 1128–1135.
45.
KonradLDietzeRRiazMA, et al. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in endometriosis-when does it happen?J Clin Med2020; 9: 1915.
46.
BartnikPKacperczyk-BartnikJGoławskiK, et al. Plasma and peritoneal fluid ZEB levels in patients with endometriosis and infertility. Biomedicines2022; 10: 2460.
47.
SundqvistJAnderssonKLScarselliG, et al. Expression of adhesion, attachment and invasion markers in eutopic and ectopic endometrium: a link to the aetiology of endometriosis. Hum Reprod2012; 27: 2737–2746.
48.
LaudanskiPCharkiewiczRTolwinskaA, et al. Profiling of selected MicroRNAs in proliferative eutopic endometrium of women with ovarian endometriosis. Biomed Res Int2015; 2015: 760698. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-11-78
49.
GoławskiKSoczewicaRKacperczyk-BartnikJ, et al. The role of cadherin 12 (CDH12) in the peritoneal fluid among patients with endometriosis and endometriosis-related infertility. Int J Environ Res Public Health2022; 19: 11586.
50.
DehghanianMYarahmadiGFazeliJ, et al. Evaluation of the relationship between miR-337-3p and RAP1A gene in endometriosis. J Endometr Pelvic Pain Disord2022; 14(4): 178–182.
51.
MolBWBayramNLijmerJG, et al. The performance of CA-125 measurement in the detection of endometriosis: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril1998; 70: 1101–1108.
52.
HirschMDuffyJDavisCJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of cancer antigen 125 for endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG2016; 123: 1761–1768.
53.
MayKEConduit-HulbertSAVillarJ, et al. Peripheral biomarkers of endometriosis: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update2010; 16: 651–674.
54.
MayKEVillarJKirtleyS, et al. Endometrial alterations in endometriosis: a systematic review of putative biomarkers. Hum Reprod Update2011; 17: 637–653.
55.
LiuENisenblatVFarquharC, et al. Urinary biomarkers for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2015; 2015: CD012019.
56.
GuptaDHullMLFraserI, et al. Endometrial biomarkers for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2016; 4: CD012165.
57.
NisenblatVBossuytPMShaikhR, et al. Blood biomarkers for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2016; 2016: CD012179.
58.
CosarEMamillapalliRErsoyGS, et al. Serum microRNAs as diagnostic markers of endometriosis: a comprehensive array-based analysis. Fertil Steril2016; 106: 402–409.
59.
VanhieAODPeterseDBeckersA, et al. Plasma miRNAs as biomarkers for endometriosis. Hum Reprod2019; 34: 1650–1660.
60.
MoustafaSBurnMMamillapalliR, et al. Accurate diagnosis of endometriosis using serum microRNAs. Am J Obstet Gynecol2020; 223: 557.e1–557.e11.
