Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective:

To assess the safety and efficacy of ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve blocks for patients with lower abdominal wall pain in a gynaecology setting.

Methods:

A retrospective chart review of 131 patients who received ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve blocks at a tertiary referral centre for pelvic pain between 1 January 2012 and 13 July 2017 was performed. Patient demographics, history, examination findings and block data were extracted. Chi-square and Mann–Whitney U tests explored differences in patient characteristics between patients with and without effective response to their initial ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve block.

Results:

A total of 465 ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve blocks were performed among patients. The effect of the initial block was available for 99 out of 131 patients. Of these patients, 70% (n = 69) reported a great improvement in pain, 9% (n = 9) some improvement in pain, 18% (n = 18) no response and 3% (n = 3) worsening of pain. A significantly greater number of patients who were not responsive to their first block reported unilateral pain (p = 0.040) and had a history of vulvodynia (p = 0.038) when compared to patients who were responsive to their first block. Seven patients (5%) reported minor adverse events related to blocks.

Conclusion:

Ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve blocks provide pain relief for those with pelvic pain localized to the lower abdominal wall, with a low rate of minor adverse events.

Keywords

Iliohypogastric ilioinguinal nerve blocks pelvic pain lower abdominal wall

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ayorinde

Macfarlane

Saraswat

et al . Chronic pelvic pain in women: an epidemiological perspective. Womens Health 2015; 11(6): 851–864.

Reiter

RC.

A profile of women with chronic pelvic pain. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1990; 33(1): 130–136.

Howard

FM.

The role of laparoscopy as a diagnostic tool in chronic pelvic pain. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2000; 14(3): 467–494.

Reiter

RC.

Occult somatic pathology in women with chronic pelvic pain. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1990; 33(1): 154–160.

Mui

Allaire

Williams

et al . Abdominal wall pain in women with chronic pelvic pain. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2016; 38(2): 154–159.

Reiter

RC.

Evidence-based management of chronic pelvic pain. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1998; 41(2): 422–435.

Slocumb

JC.

Neurological factors in chronic pelvic pain: trigger points and the abdominal pelvic pain syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 149(5): 536–543.

Reiter

Gambone

JC.

Nongynecologic somatic pathology in women with chronic pelvic pain and negative laparoscopy. J Reprod Med 1991; 36(4): 253–259.

Sharp

HT.

Myofascial pain syndrome of the abdominal wall for the busy clinician. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2003; 46(4): 783–788.

10.

Sharp

HT.

Management of postoperative abdominal wall pain. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2015; 58(4): 798–804.

11.

Jarrell

Giamberardino

Robert

et al . Bedside testing for chronic pelvic pain: discriminating visceral from somatic pain. Pain Res Treat 2011; 692102.

12.

Aredo

Heyrana

Karp

et al . Relating chronic pelvic pain and endometriosis to signs of sensitization and myofascial pain and dysfunction. Semin Reprod Med 2017; 35(1): 88–97.

13.

Perry

CP.

Peripheral neuropathies and pelvic pain: diagnosis and management. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2003; 46(4): 789–796.

14.

Knockaert

D’Heygere

Bobbaers

HJ.

Ilioinguinal nerve entrapment: a little-known cause of iliac fossa pain. Postgrad Med J 1989; 65(767): 632–635.

15.

Stulz

Pfeiffer

KM.

Peripheral nerve injuries resulting from common surgical procedures in the lower portion of the abdomen. Arch Surg 1982; 117(3): 324–327.

16.

Van Rijckevorsel

Boelens

Roumen

et al . Treatment response and central pain processing in anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome: an explorative study. Scand J Pain 2017; 14: 53–59.

17.

Smart

Blake

Staines

et al . The discriminative validity of ‘nociceptive’, ‘peripheral neuropathic’, and ‘central sensitization’ as mechanisms-based classifications of musculoskeletal pain. Clin J Pain 2011; 27(8): 655–663.

18.

Brown

JRG

Bernstein

Friedenberg

et al . Chronic abdominal wall pain: an under-recognized diagnosis leading to unnecessary testing. J Clin Gastroenterol 2016; 50(10): 828–835.

19.

Suleiman

Johnston

DE.

The abdominal wall: an overlooked source of pain. Am Fam Physician 2001; 64(3): 431–438.

20.

Skinner

Lauder

GR.

Rectus sheath block: successful use in the chronic pain management of pediatric abdominal wall pain. Paediatr Anaesth 2007; 17(12): 1203–1211.

21.

Peleg

Gohar

Koretz

et al . Abdominal wall pain in pregnant women caused by thoracic lateral cutaneous nerve entrapment. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1997; 74(2): 169–171.

22.

Peleg

Abdominal wall pain caused by cutaneous nerve entrapment in an adolescent girl taking oral contraceptive pills. J Adolesc Health 1999; 24(1): 45–47.

23.

Kuan

Chen

et al . Efficacy of treating abdominal wall pain by local injection. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 45(3): 239–243.

24.

Howard

FM.

Chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101(3): 594–611.

25.

Daniels

Khan

KS.

Chronic pelvic pain in women. BMJ 2010; 341: c4834.

26.

Howard

FM.

An evidence-based medicine approach to the treatment of endometriosis-associated chronic pelvic pain: placebo-controlled studies. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2000; 7(4): 477–488.

27.

ACOG committee opinion: number 345, October 2006: vulvodynia. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108(4): 1049–1052.

28.

Bair

Robinson

Katon

et al . Depression and pain comorbidity: a literature review. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163(20): 2433–2445.

29.

Thornton

Drummond

Current concepts in vulvodynia with a focus on pathogenesis and pain mechanisms. Australas J Dermatol 2016; 57(4): 253–263.

Safety and efficacy of ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve blocks for treatment of pelvic pain

Abstract

Objective:

Methods:

Results:

Conclusion:

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References