Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background:

The resonant coil design is taken as the core technology in the magnetic coupling resonant wireless power transmission system, which achieves energy transmission by the coupling of the resonant coil. This paper studies the effect of the resonant coil on energy transmission and the efficiency of the system. Combining a two-coil with a three-coil system, the optimum design method for the resonant coil is given to propose a novel coil structure.

Methods:

First, the co-simulation methods of Pspice and Maxwell are used. When the coupling coefficient of the resonant coil is different, the relationship between system transmission efficiency, output power, and frequency is analyzed. When the self-inductance of the resonant coil is different, the relationship between the performance and frequency of the system transmission is analyzed. Then, two-coil and three-coil structure models are built, and the parameters of the magnetic field of the coils are calculated and analyzed using the finite element method. In the end, a dual E-type simulation circuit model is used to optimize the design of the novel resonance coil.

Results:

The co-simulation results show that the coupling coefficients of the two-coil, three-coil, and novel coil systems are 0.017, 0.17 and 0.0126, respectively. The power loss of the novel coil is 16.4 mW.

Conclusions:

There is an obvious improvement in the three-coil system, which shows that the magnetic leakage of the field and the energy coupling are relatively small. The new structure coil has better performance, and the load loss is lower; it can improve the system output power and transmission efficiency.

Keywords

Co-simulation coupling coefficient resonant coil wireless power transmission

Introduction

Although by direct connection of metal wires traditional wired power transmission has good characteristics like high transmission efficiency, transmission stability, etc., this not only requires lots of copper, aluminum, and other conductive materials as a tangible conducting medium, but also can hardly keep pace with newer electronic products and high consumer demand.¹ Now, a non-contact power transmission technology – wireless power transmission (WPT) – has come into being. This can not only get rid of the need for a transmission conductive medium, but also save a lot of copper, aluminum, and other conductive materials.

According to its transmission mechanism, WPT can be classified as microwave/laser mode, inductive coupling mode, and magnetic coupling resonance mode.² The latter two modes are mainly used in the charging of mobile phones and other low-power intelligent electronic products. To some extent, technical means and the principles of the two modes are relatively similar.³ The difference lies in their forms.⁴

Early in the 19th century, Nikola Tesla from the United States had already carried out exploration and research in this area.^5,6 Yet, because of the early electronic power technology and related materials, the experiments did not lead to substantial developments. In 2007, Professor Marin Soljacic at MIT proposed magnetically coupled resonant WPT technology in the journal Science, pushing WPT technology to a new high.⁷ The technology has been recognized by many domestic and foreign researchers. Following this article, researchers actively carried out studies and developed theories, such as the coupling model theory⁸ and the equivalent circuit model theory.⁹ In recent years, WPT has been developed in many universities and in companies in developing countries, mainly concentrating on the improvement of power transmission and transmission efficiency. Some progress has been made.^8–13

In order to further improve the transmission efficiency and transmission power of the WPT system, this paper takes the material copper as its research object, focusing on the transmission model and the WPT system, analyzing the effects of different coil structures and parameters on system performance, and the transmission performance of a simulation system, in order to provide a theoretical basis for the optimal design of a low-power WPT system.

System model and principle

According to Zhang et al.,⁴ the two-coil WPT system in the inductive coupling mode and magnetic coupling resonance mode have the same equivalent circuit, as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Transmission system equivalent circuit model.

In Figure 1, $U_{S}$ means the ideal AC power source, $R_{1}$ and $R_{2}$ are the resistance of the transmitting and receiving coil respectively, $L_{1}$ and $L_{2}$ are the self-inductance of the transmitting and receiving coil respectively, and $C_{1}$ and $C_{2}$ are the resonant capacitance of the transmitting and receiving coil respectively.

According to Zhou et al.,¹⁰ in the resonant WPT system, the frequency of the resonant circuit with $L_{1}$ and $C_{1}$ is $f_{1} = \frac{1}{2 π \sqrt{L_{1} C_{1}}}$ ; the frequency of the resonant circuit with $L_{2}$ and $C_{2}$ is $f_{2} = \frac{1}{2 π \sqrt{L_{2} C_{2}}}$ ; and the AC frequency is $f_{0}$ . Only when $f_{0} = f_{1} = f_{2}$ is the system in the resonant state in which it achieves high efficiency during energy transformation.

As known from the work of Li et al.,¹¹ in the resonant WPT system the maximum efficiency $η_{\max}$ is expressed as follows:

η_{\max} = \frac{k^{2} Q_{1} Q_{2}}{{(1 + \sqrt{1 + k^{2} Q_{1} Q_{2}})}^{2}} = 1 - \frac{2}{1 + \sqrt{1 + k^{2} Q_{1} Q_{2}}},

(1)

where

$k$ is the coupling coefficient between $L_{1}$ and $L_{2}$ ;

$Q_{1}$ is the quality factor of the primary coupler/transmitting coil; and

$Q_{2}$ is the quality factor of the pickup coupler/receiving coil.

From equation (1), when $k^{2} Q_{1} Q_{2}$ is bigger, the maximum efficiency $η_{\max}$ is higher. For $k^{2} Q_{1} Q_{2}$ , because $k = \frac{M}{\sqrt{L_{1} L_{2}}}$ , $Q = \frac{ω L}{R}$ , so it can be expressed as

k^{2} Q_{1} Q_{2} = \frac{ω^{2} M^{2}}{R_{1} R_{2}}

(2)

where

$M$ is the mutual inductance between the resonance coils;

$R_{1}$ is the resistance of the transmitting coil;

$R_{2}$ is the resistance of the receiving coil; and

$ω$ is the system angular frequency.

For one system that has a constant frequency, $ω$ is unchanged. Therefore, an efficiency factor $α$ is proposed and defined as

α = \frac{M^{2}}{R_{1} R_{2}}

(3)

If we put equation (3) into equation (2), $k^{2} Q_{1} Q_{2}$ can be expressed as

k^{2} Q_{1} Q_{2} = ω^{2} α

(4)

Putting equation (4) into equation (1), $η_{\max}$ can be expressed as

η_{\max} = 1 - \frac{2}{1 + \sqrt{1 + ω^{2} α}}

(5)

As shown in equation (5), the system efficiency $η_{\max}$ gets higher as $k^{2} Q_{1} Q_{2}$ increases. Therefore, $α$ could be taken to measure the advantage of the resonance coil system.

Performance effect analysis

There are a multitude of influencing factors in the WPT system performance. According to Tang et al.,¹² when the ratio $R_{3} / R_{2}$ of the load resistance and the receiving coil resistance is bigger, the system transmission efficiency is greater, and the coil coupling condition could be reflected through the coupling coefficient directly. According to Li et al.,¹³ the output characteristics of the WPT system are related to the coupling coefficient and the coil self-inductance. Accordingly, it is necessary to separately analyze how the coupling coefficient and the coil self-inductance affect the system output power when the coil resistance is constant, providing a theoretical basis for the optimization coil design.

Effect of the coil coupling coefficient

Other parameters of the circuit are constant. When the coil coupling coefficient $k_{1}$ is changed, the impact on the characteristics of the system transmission can be explored. Fixing a value of the load resistance $R_{3}$ , the Pspice simulation circuit is built, as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

The circuit simulation diagram.

With the simulation circuit parameters set as shown in Figure 2, the resonant frequency of the system is set to 1 MHz. With the coupling coefficient variation in the range 0.01–0.31, and a stepping of 0.02, a total of 16 curves are obtained. In different coupling coefficients, using AC sweeping with the Pspice simulation circuit, a waveform curve of the system output power changing with the frequency is obtained (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Different coupling coefficients: the output power changes with the driving frequency curve.

As shown in Figure 3, when the resonance frequency is 1 MHz, the output power of the system first increases and then decreases with the coupling coefficient. At the coupling coefficient of 0.15, the output power of the system reaches its maximum.

Figure 4 shows how the output efficiency of the system changes with different coupling coefficients.

Figure 4.

Different coupling coefficients: the output efficiency changes with the driving frequency.

Figure 4 shows that the output power will increase with the coupling coefficient when the system is at the resonant frequency.

Select the appropriate coupling coefficient for the resonant coil can ensure high output power and high transmission efficiency in the WPT system.

Effect of the coil self-inductance

To explore the influence of coil inductance L on the transmission characteristics of the system, the simulation circuit parameters are as shown in Figure 2, with other parameters fixed, and the load resistor $R_{3}$ is 50 Ω $Ω$ . Using AC sweep analysis in the Pspice simulation circuit, with a sweep frequency range of 0.4–2 MHz, a coupling coefficient of 0.2, coil self-inductance range of 4–60 μH to, and stepping of 2, a total of 29 curves are obtained. As the frequency changes, the system output power changes. The curves are shown in Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Different coil self-inductance: the output power changes with frequency.

As shown in Figure 5, the output power of the system first increases and then decreases with the self-inductance of the coil. When the self-inductance of the coil is 16 μH, the output power of the system is maximized.

As shown in Figure 6, the output efficiency increases with self-inductance. When the efficiency of the system output is at its maximum, the self-inductance is 60 μH, and the output power is 2.4 W. Thus, for a certain system, it is crucial to select the appropriate coil inductance.

Figure 6.

Different coil self-inductance: the output efficiency changes with the frequency.

Modeling and analysis

Traditional resonant coil

It can be seen from the foregoing that when the parameter α is greater, the efficiency of the system output is greater. In order to ensure the equipment transfers energy within a certain range, a certain space volume in the magnetic field is required. Due to the various shapes of low-power electronic products, the structural characteristics of the resonant coil need to be considered. In view of the limited length of this article, only a two-coil structure and three-coil structure are researched. Using the electromagnetic simulation software Maxwell, a transceiver coil model is established, and the magnetic field distribution, self-inductance, mutual inductance, and resistance of the resonance coils are analyzed using the finite element method, looking at the transmission efficiency, energy transmission, and coil structure.

Two-coil structure

As shown in Figure 7, the resonant coils of the solenoid structure and the planar spiral structure are established in the electromagnetic simulation software Maxwell; the specific parameter settings are shown in Table 1.

Figure 7.

Planar spiral coil structure model (a) and the solenoid coil model (b).

Table 1.

Parameters of two-coil structure model.

Resonant coil structure	Planar spiral	Solenoid tube
Wire radius	3 mm	2 mm
Wire gap	1 mm	2 mm
Coil inner diameter	8/8 cm	12/12 cm
Coil outer diameter	24.6/24.6 cm	12/12 cm
Coil turns	12/12	10/10
Coil distance	30 cm	30 cm
Excitation current	1 A	1 A

Figure 8 shows the distribution of the magnetic field intensity of the planar spiral structure resonant coil, and Figure 9 shows the distribution of the magnetic field intensity of the solenoid structure resonant coil.

Figure 8.

Z = 30, the magnetic field intensity distribution (a) and the magnetic field intensity profile in YZ (b) of the planar spiral resonant coil structure.

Figure 9.

Z = 30, the magnetic field intensity distribution (a) and the magnetic field intensity profile in YZ (b) of the solenoid resonance coil structure.

Figure 8(a) shows that the magnetic field intensity generated by the planar spiral structure is greatest in the center of the circle, with a wide distribution; in contrast, the magnetic field intensity generated by the receiving coil is weak. The effective area of the magnetic field generated by the entire system is twice as large as the coil area. As shown in Figure 8(b), the energy coupling is uniform, but the magnetic flux leakage (MFL) area of the non-opposite resonant coil is large.

Figure 9(a) shows that only the magnetic field intensity of the receiving coil is relatively large, the magnetic field intensity of other regions is small. This illustrates that the effect of the energy transfer is noticeable. As shown in Figure 9(b), the energy coupling is uniform, but the MFL area of the non-opposite resonant coil is large.

The results of the finite element analysis for the resonance coils in the Maxwell eddy current field are shown in Table 2.

Table 2.

Simulation solution results of two-coil structure models.

Resonant coil structure	Planar spiral	Solenoid tube
Self-inductance	23.49 μH	27.61 μH
Mutual inductance	0.40 μH	0.45 μH
Resistance	6.03 mΩ	26.10 mΩ
Coupling coefficient	0.017	0.016
$α \times 10^{- 9}$	4.29	0.30

Three-coil structure

Using a three-coil structure mainly means adding a repeating coil between the transmitting coil and the receiving coil. The model established in Maxwell is shown in Figure 10. The magnetic field intensity distribution of the three-coil resonant structure is shown in Figure 11.

Figure 10.

Three-coil structure model.

Figure 11.

Z = 30, the magnetic field intensity distribution (a) and the magnetic field intensity profile in YZ (b) of the three-coil resonant structure.

Figure 11(a) shows that the magnetic field strength generated by the three-coil structure is greatest, with a wide distribution area in the center circle of the resonant coil; yet the magnetic field generated by the receiving coil is weak. The effective area of the magnetic field generated by the entire system is twice as large as the coil area. As shown in Figure 11(b), energy coupling is uniform, but the MFL area of the non-opposite resonant coil is rather small.

The coil inductance is initially calculated using the static magnetic field of Maxwell. Then, the transient model is established, and afterwards imported into the circuit diagram in Simplorer (Figure 12). $R_{1}$ and $C_{1}$ are the parameters of the transmitting coil. $R_{2}$ and $C_{2}$ are the parameters of the receiving coil. $R_{4}$ and $C_{3}$ are the parameters of the middle coil. $R_{3}$ is the parameter of the load. The current amplitude and the phase angle of the coil circuit are obtained respectively by the transient sweep in Simplorer, as shown in Table 3. The coil inductance, the mutual inductance, and the resistance are solved in the eddy current field of Maxwell, and the simulation results are shown in Table 4.

Figure 12.

Co-simulation circuit.

Table 3.

Current excitation of the three-coil structure.

Coil name	Current amplitude	Current phase angle
Transmitting coil	0.32 A	0°
Middle coil	0.59 A	108°
Receiving coil	0.07 A	216°

Table 4.

Simulation results of the three-coil structure.

Items	Data
Transmitting inductance	27.55 μH
Transmitting resistor	26.10 $m Ω$
Receiving inductance	27.92 μH
Receiving resistance	26.10 $m Ω$
Middle inductance	27.51 μH
Middle resistance	26.20 $m Ω$
Coupling coefficient	0.17

As shown in Table 3, the phase of the excitation current of the middle coil of the three-coil structure is advanced, which causes the large magnetic field strength of the three-coil structure.

Comparing Table 4 with Table 2, the three-coil structure shows greater improvement on inductance, the mutual inductance, and the coupling coefficient, thus indicating that the three-coil structure has a great advantage in the transmission effect.

New resonant coil

Combined with the above research, the coil design and optimization steps are given as follows:

Determine the appropriate operating frequency.

Determine the coil material, to ensure the minimum internal resistance at this frequency, to improve the quality factor of the coil.

(Based on the simulation results, the shapes of the transmitting and receiving coils are preliminarily designed.

The coil model is established in Maxwell to solve the inductance, resistance, and coupling coefficient of the coil.

The system principle circuit diagram is set up in Pspice to determine the best coupling coefficient, the minimum coil internal resistance, and the optimal load value.

According to the simulation results, the coil is designed and optimized.

According to the design and optimization method of the resonant coil, a novel resonant coil structure is proposed, as shown in Figure 13.

Figure 13.

New resonant coil structure model.

The dual E-type inverter circuit shows that the resistance of the transmitter has been determined, so it is not necessary to consider the launch coil resistance design. For the resonant coil system, the transmitter needs to provide the resonant coil with the strength of the MFL and magnetic field, so the transmitter selects the solenoid structure with the flat core. The coil internal resistance has an influence on the transmission of the whole system, so the receiving coil has a plane spiral structure. The resonant coil parameters shown in Table 5 are given by a large number of the coil simulation experiments, and the new coil structure and the traditional coil structure are compared and analyzed.

Table 5.

Receiving coil parameters of the new structure.

Items	Data
Receiving coil wire radius	2 mm
Wire gap	1 mm
Coil inner diameter	5 cm
Coil outer diameter	20 cm
Receiving coil turns	10
Transmitting coil cross-section width	1 mm
Transmitting coil cross-section height	1 mm
Transmitting coil turns	5
Transmitting coil outer diameter	22 cm

The power of the load resistor $R_{3}$ obtained by Pspice transient scanning is shown in Figure 15 in conjunction with the double E-type inverter circuit shown in Figure 14.

Figure 14.

Simulation circuit model based on the new structure resonant coil.

Figure 15.

The power waveform of the load resistance of the new structure.

The parameters of the resonant coil are obtained by the eddy current field solver of Maxwell electromagnetic simulation software, as shown in Table 6.

Table 6.

Simulation results of the new structure.

Items	Data
Transmitting inductance	19.33 μH
Transmitting resistor	59.80 mΩ
Receiving inductance	18.67 μH
Receiving resistance	10.28 mΩ
Mutual inductance	0.24 μH
Coupling coefficient	0.0126

Taking the resonant coil parameters into the Pspice circuit simulation model, the power consumption of the load resistance is shown in Figure 15.

As can be seen from Figure 15, the power consumption of the load resistance $R_{3}$ is about 16.4 mW.

The parameters of the traditional multi-coil tandem structure are shown in Table 7.

Table 7.

Traditional coil parameters.

Items	Data
Transmitting coil wire radius	1.1 mm
Wire gap	14.8 mm
Coil inner diameter	4.5 cm
Coil outer diameter	21 cm
Transmitting coil turns	5
Receiving coil cross-section width	1 mm
Receiving coil cross-section height	1 mm
Receiving coil turns	4
Receiving coil outer diameter	22 cm

The self-inductance, coupling coefficient, and resistance of the resonant system are obtained using Maxwell, as shown in Table 8.

Table 8.

Simulation result of the traditional structure.

Items	Data
Transmitting inductance	14.69 μH
Transmitting resistor	45.86 mΩ
Receiving inductance	9.06 μH
Receiving resistance	43.66 mΩ
Mutual inductance	0.09 μH
Coupling coefficient	0.018

After the parameters of the traditional coil structure are updated, the power of the load resistor $R_{3}$ is obtained by Pspice transient scanning (Figure 16), in conjunction with the double E-type inverter circuit shown in Figure 14.

Figure 16.

The power waveform of the load resistance of the traditional structure.

As can be seen from Figure 16, the power consumption of the load resistance $R_{3}$ is about 43.6 μW.

By comparing the designed and the traditional resonant coil at the same load resistance, we can see that the power consumption of the designed resonant coil is lower, which can effectively improve the power and efficiency of the WPT system.

Experimental results and analysis

In testing the hardware, the resonant coil conforms to the Qi standard, as shown in Figure 17. The specific parameters of the resonant coil are shown in Table 9.

Figure 17.

The transmitting coil (a) and the receiving coil (b), conforming to the Qi standard.

Table 9.

Parameters of the coil.

Parameters	Value
Outer diameter of the transmitting coil	43.7 mm
Inner diameter of the transmitting coil	20.4 mm
Thickness of the transmitting coil	3 mm
Outer diameter of the receiving coil	23 mm
Inner diameter of the receiving coil	5 mm
Thickness of the receiving coil	1 mm

In this experiment, the system input voltage is 12 V, and the resonant circuit of WPT adopts the fixed frequency modulation mode. Figure 18 shows the coupling coefficient of the resonant coil under different operating modes: the constant current mode (CC mode), the constant voltage mode (CV mode), and the constant resister mode (CR mode). As can be seen from the graph, the coupling coefficient of the CC mode is obviously higher than that of the CV and CR modes. The coupling coefficient is close to 1 when the coil spacing is 1 mm; when the coil spacing is 9 mm, the coupling coefficient is 0.55. When the coil spacing is 1 mm in the CV mode, the coupling coefficient is the highest, which is 0.67. When the coil spacing is 1 mm in the CR mode, the coupling coefficient is the highest at 0.61. According to the data analysis, the coupling coefficient of the new structure coil performs well.

Figure 18.

The coupling coefficient of the resonance coil under different operation modes.

Conclusions

This paper puts forward an efficiency factor $α$ to measure the system performance through the efficiency and power of the resonant WPT in order to give the influence of the resonant coil inductance and the coupling coefficient on the transmission power and the transmission efficiency of the system. Then, the resonant coil model is built using Maxwell to solve the self-inductance, mutual inductance, coupling coefficient, and distribution of the magnetic field intensity of the coil by means of the eddy current solution module. This paper elaborates on the characteristics of the resonant coils from three aspects – the transmission efficiency, the energy transmission, and the coil structure – to provide a theoretical basis for the resonant coil optimization. The co-simulation results show that the coupling coefficient and the efficiency factor of the planar spiral structure is higher than that of the solenoid tube structure, which are 0.017 and $4.29 \times 10^{- 9}$ respectively. Compared with the two-coil structure, the three-coil coupling coefficient increases significantly to a value of 0.17. The magnetic field intensity distribution shows that the MFL area of the non-opposite resonant coil is rather small, and energy coupling is uniform. Finally, the new resonant coil structure can effectively improve the power and efficiency of the WPT system through simulation.

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work has been partly supported by the Fundamental Research Fund for Heilongjiang Provincial Universities of China (grant number HDJCCX-201622), and by the Innovation Talent Research Special Foundation of Harbin Science and Technology Bureau of China (grant number 2016RQQXJ107).

References

Guo

Zhu

Song

et al . Magnetic resonant wireless power transmission technology based on planar core. J Harbin Inst Tech 2014; 46(5): 23–27.

Ren

Research on the power characteristic of magnetic resonance based wireless power transfer. MSc thesis, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China, 2009.

Yang

MS.

Research on contactless inductively coupled power transfer technology and its application. Ph.D. thesis, Hunan University, Hunan, China, 2011.

Zhang

Zhao

Yuan

et al . A comparative study between resonant and inductive magnetically-coupled wireless power transfer. Trans China Electrotech Soc 2013; 28(S2): 18–22.

Tesla

Apparatus for transmitting electrical energy. Patent No. 1119732, USA, 1914.

Brown

WC.

The history of power transmission by radio waves. IEEE Trans Microwave Theory Tech 1984; 32(9): 1230–1242.

Kurs

Karalis

Moffatt

et al . Wireless power transfer via strongly coupled magnetic resonances. Science 2007; 317: 83–86.

Karalis

Joannopoulos

Soljacic

Efficient wireless non-radiative mid-range energy transfer. Ann Phys 2008; 323(1): 544–554.

Zhang

Qiu

et al . Maximum efficiency analysis and design of self-resonance coupling coils for wireless power transmission system. Proc CSEE 2009; 29(18): 21–29.

10.

Zhou

Zheng

Research on the frequency characteristics of wireless energy transmission system based on magnetic resonance coupling. J Hubei Univ Tech 2013; 28(1): 82–85.

11.

CC.

Wireless Power Transfer for Electric Vehicle Applications. IEEE J EM SEL TOP P 2015; 3(1): 4–17.

12.

Tang

Zhao

et al . Transfer efficiency maximum frequency of wireless power transfer via magnetic resonance coupling. Electr Mach Control 2015; 19(3): 9–13.

13.

Yang

Chen

et al . Analysis of factors influencing power and efficiency in wireless power transfer system. Adv Tech Electr Eng Energy 2012; 31(3): 31–34.

Study on electromagnetic characteristics of the magnetic coupling resonant coil for the wireless power transmission system

Abstract

Background:

Methods:

Results:

Conclusions:

Keywords

Introduction

System model and principle

Performance effect analysis

Effect of the coil coupling coefficient

Effect of the coil self-inductance

Modeling and analysis

Traditional resonant coil

Two-coil structure

Three-coil structure

New resonant coil

Experimental results and analysis

Conclusions

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

References