An important issue related to the use of highly crosslinked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (HXLPE) in arthroplasty concerns the long-term oxidation of the polymer and related degradation of its end-user properties. Although in very recent years several procedures have been introduced into the manufacturing of prosthetic components to overcome this problem, the risk of long-term oxidation has not been completely eliminated. The aim of this study is to compare the effects on the physical and mechanical properties of HXLPE from two different thermal treatments used to promote oxidative stabilization. It also gives a description of the effects of oxidative degradation on the mechanical performance of HXLPE.
Materials and Methods
Virgin medical grade UHMWPE GUR 1020 was irradiated at 100 kGy and submitted to heat treatments at either 110°C (annealing) or 150°C (remelting). Oxidation analysis, Wear tests, Tensile tests and Charpy impact tests were carried out.
Results
The temperature of the thermal treatment affects both oxidation resistance and impact strength of HXLPE, whereas wear resistance is not affected.
Conclusion
The study provides a confirmation that oxidative degradation is a serious issue for the long-term performance of HXLPE prostheses.
WangA, SunDC, StarkC, DumbletonJH.Wear mechanisms of UHMWPE in total joint replacement.Wear1995; 181–183: 241–9.
2.
LewisG.Polyethylene wear in total hip and knee arthroplasties.J Biomed Mater Res1997; 38A: 55–75.
3.
LewisG.Properties of crosslinked ultra high molecular weight polyethylene.Biomaterials2001; 22: 371–401.
4.
KurtzSM, MuratogluOK, EvansM, EdidinAA.Advances in the processing, sterilization, and crosslinking of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene for total joint arthroplasty.Biomaterials1999; 20: 1659–88.
5.
RiesMD, PruittL.Effect of cross-linking on the microstructure and mechanical properties of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene.Clin Orthop Relat Res2005; 440: 149–56.
6.
McKellopH, ShenF, BinLu, CampbellP, SaloveyR.Development of an extremely wear-resistant Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene for total hip replacement.J Orthop Res1998; 17: 157–67.
7.
MuratogluOK, BragdonCR, O'ConnorDR, JastyM, HarrisWH, GulR, McGarryF.Unified wear model for highly crosslinked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylenes.Biomaterials1999; 20: 1463–70.
8.
BakerDA, BellareA, PruittL.The effects of degree of crosslinking on the fatigue crack initiation and propagation resistance of orthopaedic-grade polyethylene.J Biomed Mater Res2003; 66A: 146–54.
9.
PremnathV, HarrisWH, JastyM, MerrillEW.Gamma sterilization of UHMWPE articular implants: an analysis of the oxidation problem.Biomaterials1996; 18: 1741–53.
10.
EvererP, KeYC.Property changes or UHMW polyethylene hip cup endoprostheses during implantation.J Biomed Mater Res1984;18: 1137–51.
11.
RimnacCM, KleinRW, BettsEWrightTM.Post-irradiation aging of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene.J Bone Joint Surg [Am]1994; 76: 1052–6.
12.
YeomB, YuY-J.McKellopHA.Salovey R: Profile of oxidation in irradiated polyethylene.J Polym Sci. Part A: Polym Chem1998; 36: 329–39.
13.
FerroniD., QuagliniV., DubiniP., Highly crosslinked polyethylene: a comparative study between two UHMWPEs with distinct molecular weight.J Mech Med Biol2010; 10: 85–111.
14.
PuértolasJA, LarreaA, Gòmez-BarrenaE.Fracture behaviour of UHMWPE in non-implanted, shelf-aged knee prostheses after γ irradiation in air.Biomaterials2001; 2: 2107–14.
15.
EdidinAA, VillarragaML, HerrMP, MuthJ, YauSS, KurtzSM.Accelerated aging studies of UHMWPE.II. Virgin UHMWPE is not immune to oxidative degradation. J Biomed Mater Res2002; 61A: 323–9.
16.
KurtzSM, RimnacCM, HozackWJ, In vivo degradation of polyethylene liners after γ sterilization in air.J Bone Joint Surg [Am]2005; 87: 815–23.
17.
MoscatelliM, FarS, DelvecchioE, Structural, mechanical and wear resi stance assessment of UHMWPE orthopaedic components.J Appl Biomat Biomec2006, 4: 165–71.
18.
BostromMPG.BennetAP, RimnacCM.WrightTM.Degradation in polyethylene as a result of sterilization, shelf storage, and in vivo use.Trans Orthop Res Soc New Orleans1994; 19: 288.
19.
FurmanBD.KasprzakD.LiS.Differences in oxidation between shelf life aged and retrieved ultra high molecular weight polyethylene components.Trans Orthop Res Soc Atlanta1996; 21: 484.
20.
WeaverKD, SauerWL, BealsNB.Sterilization induced effects on UHMWPE oxidation and fatigue strength.Transactions of the Society for Biomaterials 21st Annual Meeting, San Francisco, 1995; 18: 129.
21.
BapstJM, ValentineRH, VasquezR.Wear simulation testing of direct compression moulded UHMWPE irradiated in oxygenless packaging.Transactions of the Society for Biomaterials, 23rd Annual Meeting, New Orleans1997; 20: 72.
22.
GreerKW, SchmidtMB, HamiltonJV.The hip simulator wear of gamma-vacuum, gamma-air, and ethylene oxide sterilized UHMWPE following a severe oxidative challenge.Transactions of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 44th Annual Meeting, New Orleans1998; 23: 52.
23.
ChiesaR, MoscatelliM, GiordanoC, SiccardiF, CigadaA.Influence of heat treatment on structural, mechanical and wear properties of crosslinked UHMWPE.J Appl Biomater Biomech2004; 2: 20–8.
24.
SloufM, SynkovaH, BaldrianJ, Structural changes of UHMWPE after e-beam irradiation and thermal treatment.J Biomed Mat Res2008; 85B: 240–51.
25.
MedelFJ, PeñaP, CegoñinoJ, Gomez-BarrenaE, PuértolasJA.Comparative fatigue behaviour and toughness of remelted and annealed highly crosslinked polyethylenes.J Biomed Mater Res: Appl Biomater2007; 83B: 380–90.
26.
GencurS, RimnacCM, KurtzSM.Fatigue crack propagation resistance of virgin and highly crosslinked, thermally treated ultra high molecular weight polyethylene.Biomaterials2006; 27: 1550–7.
27.
JacobsonK.The crosslinked UHMWPE. In: TrossarelliL, CostaL, eds. UHMWPE for Arthroplasty: From Synthesis to Implant.Turin, Italy: Litografia MG;2005.
28.
JoyceTJ, UnsworthA.Wear studies of all UHMWPE couples under various bio-tribological conditions.J Appl Biomater Biomech2004, 2: 29–34.
29.
EdidinAA, JewettCW, KwartengK, KalinowskiA, KurtzSM.Degradation of mechanical behavior in UHMWPE after natural and accelerated aging.Biomaterials2000; 21: 1451–60.
30.
KurtzSM, MuratogluOK, BuchananF, Interlaboratory reproducibility of standard accelerated aging methods for oxidation of UHMWPE.Biomaterials2001; 22: 1731–7.
31.
Muratoglu, Bragdon, Jasty, O'Connor, Von Knoch, Harris, Knee-Simulator Testing of Conventional and Cross-Linked Polyethylene Tibial Inserts.J Arthroplasty2004; 19: 887–97.
32.
OralE, WannomaeKK, HawkinsN, HarrisWH, MuratogluOK.A-Tocopherol-doped irradiated UHMWPE for high fatigue resistance and low wear.Biomaterials2004; 25: 5515–22.
