India is excelling in almost all parameters of economic development. However, India is experiencing economic development with a pinch of salt; massive climate and environmental changes are seen. As per Global Climate Risk Index 2021, India was ranked as the 7th worst climate hit country in the world. The present study is an attempt to empirically evaluate the impact of India’s economic growth, population, foreign investment, and trade openness on carbon emissions. The study adopts the STochastic Impacts by Regression on Population, Affluence and Technology (STIRPAT) framework augmented with the Environment Kuznet’s Curve (EKC) model with a time series data over the period 1971–2020. Results for unit root testing indicated the presence of mix stationarity for the variables, therefore, the autoregressive distributed lag approach was apt for capturing the long- and short-run dynamics. The results validated EKC for affluence and population. The outcome for FDI inflows and trade openness suggested the presence of pollution haven hypothesis for India. Policy initiatives toward green and sustainable production processes are suggested.
AbonazelM. R., & ElnabawyN. (2020). Using the ARDL bound testing approach to study the inflation rate in Egypt. Economic Consultant, 31(3), 24–41. 10.46224/ecoc.2020.3.2
2.
AfesorgborS. K., & DemenaB. A. (2022). Trade openness and environmental emissions: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Environmental and Resource Economics, 81, 287–321. 10.1007/s10640-021-00627-0
3.
AhmadM., ZhaoZ.-Y., RehmanA., ShahzadM., & LiH. (2019). Revealing long-and short-run empirical interactions among foreign direct investment, renewable power generation, and CO2 emissions in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 22220–22245. 10.1007/s11356-019-05543-x
4.
AjayiP., & OgunrinolaA. (2020). Growth, trade openness and environmental degradation in Nigeria (MPRA Paper 100713). University Library of Munich, Germany. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/323489824.pdf
5.
AkterK., NahianM. A. A., & HossainM. R. (2021). Exploring the existence of the N-shaped environmental Kuznets curve in Bangladesh: An autoregressive distributed lag bounds test approach. International Journal of Science and Business, 5(5), 150–160.
6.
AmeerA., & MunirK. (2016). Effect of economic growth, trade openness, urbanization, and technology on environment of selected Asian countries (MPRA Paper 74571). University Library of Munich, Germany. https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/74571.html
7.
ArshedN., MunirM., & IqbalM. (2021). Sustainability assessment using STIRPAT approach to environmental quality: An extended panel data analysis. Environment Science and Pollution Reserve International, 28, 18163–18175. 10.1007/s11356-020-12044-9
8.
BhatJ. A. (2018). Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption-impact on economic growth and CO2 emissions in five emerging market economies. Environmental science and pollution research international, 25(35), 35515–35530. 10.1007/s11356-018-3523-8
9.
BouchouchaN., & AliW. (2019). The impact of FDI on economic growth in Tunisia: An estimate by the ARDL approach (MPRA Paper 91465). University Library of Munich, Germany. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/91465/2/MPRA_paper_91465.pdf
10.
BrownL., McFarlaneA., CampbellK., & DasA. (2020). Remittances and CO2 emissions in Jamaica: An asymmetric modified environmental Kuznets curve. The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 22(C). 10.1016/j.jeca.2020.e00166
11.
ChuP.-Y., LinY.-L., & LinY. (2016). The effect of ecological elasticity in Taiwan’s Carbon Reduction Policies: The STIRPAT model. Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, 6(1), 121–131.
12.
ColeM. (2004). Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve: Examining the linkages,Ecological Economics, 48(1), 71–81.
13.
ColeM. A., & NeumayerE. (2004). Examining the impact of demographic factors on air pollution. Population and Environment, 26(1), 5–21.
14.
De BruynS. M., Van den BerghJ. C. J. M., & OpschoorJ. B. (1998). Economic growth and emissions: Reconsidering the empirical basis of environmental Kuznets curves. Ecological Economics, 25(2), 161–175.
15.
DietzT., & RosaE. A. (1997). Effects of population and affluence on CO2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 94(1), 175–179.
16.
EhrlichP. R., & HoldrenJ. P. (1971). Impact of Population Growth. Science, 171(3977), 1212–1217.
17.
European Environment Agency. (2022). Reducing loss of resources from waste management is key to strengthening the circular economy in Europe. https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/reducing-loss-of-resources-from/reducing-loss-of-resources-from
18.
FanS., ZhangX., & RobinsonS. (2003). Structural change and economic growth in China. Review of Development Economics, 7(3), 360–377.
19.
FarazmandH., AnvariE., & MousaviB. (2020). Urbanization and energy consumption in Iran: Application of STIRPAT model. Quarterly Journal of Applied Theories of Economics, Faculty of Economics, Management and Business, 7(3), 215–240.
20.
FosuO. A., & MagnusF. J. (2006). Bounds testing approach to cointegration: An examination of foreign direct investment trade and growth relationships. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 3(11), 2079–2085.
21.
GhazaliA., & AliG. (2019). Investigation of key contributors of CO2 emissions in extended STIRPAT model for newly industrialized countries: A dynamic common correlated estimator (DCCE) approach. Energy Reports, 5, 242–252. 10.1016/j.egyr.2019.02.006
22.
Global Climate Risk Index. (2021). Who suffers most from extreme weather events? Weather related loss events in 2019 and 2000 to 2019. Retrieved May9, 2022, from https://www.germanwatch.org/en/19777
23.
GrossmanG. M., & KruegerA. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353–377. 10.2307/2118443
24.
HalkosG. (2011). Environment and economic development: Determinants of an EKC hypothesis (MPRA Paper 33262). University Library of Munich, Germany. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/33262/1/MPRA_paper_33262.pdf
25.
HarveyA. C. (1981). Time series models. Philip Allan and Humanities Press.
26.
HaugA. A. (2002). Temporal aggregation and the power of cointegration tests: A Monte Carlo study. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 64(4), 399–412.
27.
HoangC. N. (2021). The effects of economic integration on CO2 emission: A view from institutions in emerging economies. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 11(2), 374–383.
28.
HurvichC. M., & TsaiC.-L. (1989). Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika, 76(2), 297–307. 10.1093/biomet/76.2.297
29.
IEA. (2021). India energy outlook 2021. Retrieved May2, 2022, from https://www.iea.org/reports/india-energy-outlook-2021
30.
Invest India. (2022). FDI policy. Retrieved May4, 2022, from https://www.investindia.gov.in/foreign-direct-investment
31.
IQAir report. (2021). World’s most polluted cities. Retrieved May2, 2022, from https://www.iqair.com/world-most-polluted-cities
32.
KatirciogluS. (2022). Estimating the role of urban development in environment quality: Evidence from G7 countries. Energy & Environment, 33(2), 283–314.
33.
KrishnanM. (2021, October8). Climate change: IPCC warns India of heat waves, droughts. dw. Retrieved May2, 2022, from https://www.dw.com/en/india-climate-change-ipcc/a-58822174
34.
KuznetsS. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. The American Economic Review, 45(1), 1–28. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1811581
35.
Lancet. (2020). Global population in 2100. Retrieved May4, 2022, from https://www.thelancet.com/infographics/population-forecast
36.
LeD. N. (2019). Environmental degradation and economic growth in ASEAN-10: The perspective of EKC hypothesis. Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies, 56(1), 43–62.
37.
LeT.-H., ChangY., & ParkD. (2016). Trade openness and environmental quality: International evidence. Energy Policy, 92, 45–55. 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.01.030
38.
LiB., LiuX., & LiZ. (2015). Using the STIRPAT model to explore the factors driving regional CO2 emissions: A case of Tianjin, China. Natural Hazards, 76, 1667–1685. 10.1007/s11069-014-1574-9
39.
LiM., LiL., & StrielkowskiW. (2019a). The impact of urbanization and industrialization on energy security: A case study of China. Energies, 12(11), 1–22.
40.
LiZ., LiY., & ShaoS. (2019b). Analysis of influencing factors and trend forecast of carbon emission from energy consumption in China based on expanded STIRPAT model. Energies, 12(16), 3054. 10.3390/en12163054
41.
LiddleB. (2015). What are the carbon emissions elasticities for income and population? Bridging STIRPAT and EKC via robust heterogeneous panel estimates. Global Environmental Change, 31, 62–73. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2549389
42.
LinS., SunJ., MarinovaD., & ZhaoD. (2017). Effects of population and land urbanization on China’s environmental impact: Empirical analysis based on the extended STIRPAT model. Sustainability, 9, 825. 10.3390/su9050825
43.
LorenteD. B., & Álvarez-HerranzA. (2016). Economic growth and energy regulation in the environmental Kuznets curve. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(16), 16478–16494.
44.
LorenteD. B., DrihaO., BekunF. V., & OsundinaO. (2019). Do agricultural activities induce carbon emissions? The BRICS experience. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 25218–25234. 10.1007/s11356-019-05737-3
45.
ManochaR. (2021). Do FDI flows lead to environmental degradation in developing economies? A case study of select Asian economies. Vision. Advanced online publication. 10.1177/09722629211035491
46.
McKinsey sustainability report. (2021). Retrieved May4, 2022, from https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/sustainability/our-insights/putting-carbon-markets-to-work-on-the-path-to-net-zero
47.
MonteroJ.-M., Fernández-AvilésG., & LauretiT. (2021). A local spatial STIRPAT model for outdoor NOx concentrations in the community of Madrid, Spain. Mathematics, 9(6), 1–33.
48.
MunirK., & AmeerA. (2018). Effect of economic growth, trade openness, urbanization, and technology on environment of Asian emerging economies. Management of Environmental Quality, 29(6), 1123–1134. 10.1108/MEQ-05-2018-0087
49.
NasrollahiZ., HashemiM., BameriS., & TaghvaeeV. M. (2020). Environmental pollution, economic growth, population, industrialization, and technology in weak and strong sustainability: Using STIRPAT model. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22, 1–18. 10.1007/s10668-018-0237-5
50.
NeaguO. (2019). The link between economic complexity and carbon emissions in the European Union countries: A model based on the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) approach. Sustainability, 11(17), 1–27.
51.
NosheenM., AbbasiM. A., & IqbalJ. (2020). Analyzing extended STIRPAT model of urbanization and CO2 emissions in Asian countries. Environment Science Pollution Research, 27, 45911–45924. 10.1007/s11356-020-10276-3
52.
NyoniT. (2019). Predicting total population in India: A Box-Jenkins Arima approach (MRPA Paper No. 92436). https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/92436/1/MPRA_paper_92436.pdf
53.
PalD., & MitraS. K. (2017). The environmental Kuznets curve for carbon dioxide in India and China: Growth and pollution at crossroad. Journal of Policy Modeling, 39(2), 371–385.
54.
PantaleoneF. (2020). STIRPAT model and Environmental Kuznets Curve: Empirical analysis on Italian regions. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347466766_STIRPAT_model_and_Environmental_Kuznets_Curve_empirical_analysis_on_Italian_regions
55.
PebleyA. (1998). Demography and the environment. Journal of Demography, 54(4), 377–389.
56.
PesaranM. H., & ShinY. (1999). An autoregressive distributed lag modeling approach to cointegration analysis. In StromS. (Ed.), Econometrics and economic theory in the 20th century: The Ragnar Frisch centennial symposium. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/econometrics-and-economic-theory-in-the-20th-century/an-autoregressive-distributedlag-modelling-approach-to-cointegration-analysis/0A3624D5C624BED6E2A963190403653A
57.
PesaranM. H., ShinY., & SmithR. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level of relationship. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326
58.
PorriniD. (2016). The choice between economic policies to face greenhouse consequences. In MoysB. L. & PousJ. (Eds.), Greenhouse gases. InTech. 10.5772/62255
59.
RamseyJ. B. (1969). Tests for specification errors in classical linear least-squares regression analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological), 31(2), 350–371.
60.
SajeevA. (2018). Macroeconomic effects of petroleum pricing in India [Doctoral Research Work, University of Delhi].
61.
SajeevA., & KaurS. (2020). Environmental sustainability, trade and economic growth in India: Implications for public policy. International Trade, Politics and Development, 4(2), 141–160. 10.1108/ITPD-09-2020-0079
62.
ShahbazM. (2019). Globalization-emissions nexus: Testing the EKC hypothesis in next-11 countries (MPRA Paper 93959). University Library of Munich. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/93959/1/MPRA_paper_93959.pdf
63.
ShahbazM., ChaudharyA. R., & OzturkI. (2017). Does urbanization cause increasing energy demand in Pakistan? Empirical evidence from STIRPAT model. Energy, 122(C), 83–93. 10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.080
64.
ShahbazM., LoganathanN., MuzaffarA. T., AhmedK., & JabranM. A. (2015). How urbanization affects CO2 emissions in Malaysia? The application of STIRPAT model (MPRA Paper 68422). University Library of Munich. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/213979168.pdf
65.
ShahbazM., MallickH., MahalickM.K., & SadorskyP. (2016). The role of globalization on the recent evolution of energy demand in India: Implications for sustainable development. Energy Economics. 55, 52–68.
66.
SikdarC., & MukhopadhyayK. (2016). Impact of population on carbon emission: Lessons from India. Asia-Pacific Development Journal, 23(1), 105–132.
SinghaniaM., & SainiN. (2021). Demystifying pollution haven hypothesis: Role of FDI. Journal of Business Research, 123, 516–528. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.007
69.
SinhaA., & ShahbazM. (2018). Estimation of environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emission: Role of renewable energy generation in India. Renewable Energy, 119(C), 703–711.
70.
TachieA. K., XingleL., DaudaL., MensahC. N., Appiah-TwumF., & Adjei MensahI. (2020). The influence of trade openness on environmental pollution in EU-18 countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 27(28), 35535–35555. 10.1007/s11356-020-09718-9
71.
TaşdemirF. (2022). Development, trade openness, and pollution: Is there any threshold? In DinçerH. & YükselS. (Eds.), Sustainability in energy business and finance. Springer. 10.1007/978-3-030-94051-5_10
72.
TenawD., & BeyeneA. D. (2021). Environmental sustainability and economic development in sub-Saharan Africa: A modified EKC hypothesis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 143(C). 10.1016/j.rser.2021.110897
73.
ThioE., TanM., LiL., SalmanM., LongX., SunH., & ZhuB. (2022). The estimation of influencing factors for carbon emissions based on EKC hypothesis and STIRPAT model: Evidence from top 10 countries. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24, 11226–11259. 10.1007/s10668-021-01905-z
74.
TiwariA. K., ShahbazM., & HyeQ. M. (2013). The environmental Kuznets curve and the role of coal consumption in India: Cointegration and causality analysis in an open economy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 18, 519–527. 10.1016/j.rser.2012.10.031
75.
TorrasM., & BoyceJ. (1998). Income, inequality, and pollution: A reassessment of the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecological Economics, 25(2), 147–160. 10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00177-8
76.
TsiantikoudisS., ZafeiriouE., KyriakopoulosG., & ArabatzisG. (2019). Revising the environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation: An empirical study for Bulgaria. Sustainability, 11(16), 4364. 10.3390/su11164364
77.
UdembaE. N., & PhilipL. D. (2022). Policy insight from renewable energy, foreign direct investment (FDI), and urbanization towards climate goal: Insight from Indonesia. Environment Science Pollution Research, 29, 54492–54506. 10.1007/s11356-022-19599-9
78.
VillanthenkodathM. A., GuptaM., SainiS., & SahooM. (2021). Impact of economic structure on the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis in India. Economic Structures, 10, Article 28. 10.1186/s40008-021-00259-z
79.
VitaG. D. (2008). Is the discount rate relevant in explaining the environmental Kuznets curve?Journal of Policy Modeling, 30(2), 191–270.
80.
WangP., WuW., ZhuB., & WeiY. (2013). Examining the impact factors of energy-related CO2 emissions using the STIRPAT model in Guangdong Province, China. Applied Energy, 106(C), 65–71.
81.
World Population Review. (2022). https://worldpopulationreview.com/countries/india-population
82.
XiangC., CheX., ZhuB., ZhaoJ., & XieR. (2018). Will developing countries become pollution havens for developed countries? An empirical investigation in the Belt and Road. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 624–632. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.291
83.
YorkR., RosaE. A., & DietzT. (2003). STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: Analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts. Ecological Economics, 46(3), 351–365. 10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00188-5
84.
ZafarK. (2020). ARDL: Analysis of the relationship among exports, FDI, current account deficit and economic growth in Pakistan. Iranian Economic Review, 24(2), 393–414.
85.
Zambrano-MonserrateM., LaraC. C., & UrgilésR. (2016). Is there an inverted U-shaped curve? Empirical analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve in Singapore. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 25(1–2), 145–162. 10.1080/16081625.2016.1245625
86.
ZhangJ. (2021). Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis on CO2 emissions: Evidence for China. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(3), 93. 10.3390/jrfm14030093
