The Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis advocates a reversed U-shaped association between different pollutants and per capita income. EKC postulates that speedy growth certainly results in environmental degradation due to glut use of natural resources and emission of pollutants. The study used carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, economic growth, energy consumption, and the annual growth rate of population to investigate the EKC hypothesis in India and China for the period of 1971–2013. Furthermore, to explore the long-run and short-run relationship among competing variables, the autoregressive distributed lag model (ARDL) is used. Granger causality test is used to investigate the long-run and short-run causality between variables under study. The results support the EKC hypothesis in India and China, in both long-run and short-run, and inverse U-shaped association is found between CO2 emission and economic growth. Unidirectional causality seen in both countries in terms of economic growth and CO2 emissions. In addition, the coefficient of economic growth in a short-run model provides the evidence that there has been a gradual decline in environmental degradation (downward sloping of EKC) and the quality of the environment is gradually improving in China. Based on the findings, the study suggests that environmental policymakers, especially in India, should seriously address the issue of CO2 emissions as it has a tendency to move faster in the coming years.
AhmedK., & LongW. (2012). Environmental Kuznets curve and Pakistan: An empirical analysis. Procedia Economics and Finance, 1(12), 4–13. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(12)00003-2
2.
AlamM. M., MuradM. W., NomanA. H. M., & OzturkI. (2016). Relationships among carbon emissions, economic growth, energy consumption and population growth: Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Brazil, China, India and Indonesia. Ecological Indicators, 70, 466–479. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.06.043
3.
Al-MulaliU., SolarinS. A., & OzturkI. (2016). Investigating the presence of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis in Kenya: An autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) approach. Natural Hazards, 80(3), 1729–1747. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-2050-x
4.
ArrowK., BolinB., CostanzaR., DasguptaP., FolkeC., HollingC. S., … PimentelD. (1995). Economic growth, carrying capacity and the environment. Science, 268, 520–521.
5.
AslanidisN., & IranzoS. (2009). Environment and development: Is there a Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions?Applied Economics, 41(6), 803–810. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840601018994
6.
AylorM. S. C. T. (1995). Is free trade good for the environment ?American Economic Association, 91(4), 877–908.
7.
BaruaA., & HubacekK. (2009). An empirical analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve for water pollution in India. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 9(1–2), 50–68. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-57849133237&partnerID=40
8.
ChenJ., & HuangY. (2013, December). The study of the relationship between carbon dioxide (CO2) emission and economic growth. Journal of International and Global Economic Studies, 6(2), 45–61.
9.
ChindoS., AbdulrahimA., WaziriS. I., HuongW. M., & AhmadA. A. (2015). Energy consumption, CO2 emissions and GDP in Nigeria. GeoJournal, 80(3), 315–322. Retrived from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-014-9558-6
10.
CongregadoE., Feria-GallardoJ., GolpeA. A., & IglesiasJ. (2016). The environmental Kuznets curve and CO2 emissions in the USA. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(18), 18407–18420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6982-9
11.
DickeyD., & FullerW. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimates for Autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 427–431.
12.
DindaS. (2004). Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: A survey. Ecological Economics, 49(4), 431–455. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.02.011
13.
EngleR. F., & GrangerC. W. J. (1987). Co-integration and error-correction: Representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251–276.
14.
FarhaniS., ChaibiA., & RaultC. (2014). A study of CO2 emissions, output, energy consumption, and trade (Working Paper No. 2014-056). Retrieved from http://v6.ipag.fr/wp-content/uploads/recherche/WP/IPAG_WP_2014_056.pdf
15.
GaleottiM., LanzaA., & PauliF. (2006). Reassessing the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: A robustness exercise. Ecological Economics, 57(1), 152–163. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.031
16.
Global Energy Statistical Yearbook (2016). Global Energy Data. Retrieved from https://yearbook.enerdata.net/
17.
GökmenoğluK., & TaspinarN. (2016). The relationship between Co2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth and FDI: The case of Turkey. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 25(5), 706–723. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2015.1119876
18.
GrossmanG. M., & KruegerA. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, No. 3914, pp. 1–57. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3386/w3914
19.
HarbaughW. T., LevinsonA., & WilsonD. M. (2016). Reexamining the empirical evidence for an environmental Kuznets curveThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(3), 541–551.
20.
HossainS. (2012, November). An econometric analysis for CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, foreign trade and urbanization of Japan. Low Carbon Economy, 3, 92–105. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4236/lce.2012.323013
21.
HungM., & ShawD. (2006). Economic growth and the environmental Kuznets curve in Taiwan: A simultaneity model analysis. In BoldrinM. (Eds.), Long-run growth and economic development: From theory to empirics (pp. 1–25). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
22.
HussainM., JavaidM. irfan, & DrakeP. R. (2012). An econometric study of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, energy consumption, and economic growth of Pakistan. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 6(4), 518–533. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/17506221211282019
23.
IbrahiemD. M. (2015). Renewable electricity consumption, foreign direct investment and economic growth in Egypt: An ARDL approach. Procedia Economics and Finance, 30(15), 313–323. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01299-X
24.
JalilA., & MahmudS. F. (2009). Environment Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: A cointegration analysis for China. Energy Policy, 37(12), 5167–5172. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.044
25.
JayanthakumaranK., & LiuY. (2012). Openness and the environmental Kuznets curve: Evidence from China. Economic Modelling, 29(3), 566–576. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2011.12.011
26.
KhedV. D. (2016). Nexus of economic growth and environmental degradation in India environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) approach. Journal of Poverty, Investment and Development, 20, 5–8.
27.
LeeS.-J., & YooS.-H. (2016). Energy consumption, CO2 emission, and economic growth: Evidence from Mexico. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 11(8), 711–717. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2012.726695
28.
ManagiS., & JenaP. R. (2008). Environmental productivity and Kuznets curve in India. Ecological Economics, 65(2), 432–440. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.011
29.
Mohammed AlbimanM., Nassor SuleimanN., Omar BakaH. (2015). The relationship between energy consumption, CO2 emissions and economic growth in Tanzania. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 9(3), 361–375. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/IJESM-05-2014-0006
30.
MukherjeeS., & KathuriaV. (2006). Is economic growth sustainable? Environmental quality of Indian States after 1991. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 9(1). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJSD.2006.010937”10.1504/IJSD.2006.010937
31.
NarayanP. K., & NarayanS. (2010). Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: Panel data evidence from developing countries. Energy Policy, 38(1), 661–666. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.005
32.
OhlanR. (2015). The impact of population density, energy consumption, economic growth and trade openness on CO2 emissions in India. Natural Hazards, 79(2), 1409–1428. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1898-0
33.
OhlanR. (2016). Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and economic growth in India. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2016.1190801
34.
OzturkI., & Al-MulaliU. (2015). Investigating the validity of the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Cambodia. Ecological Indicators, 57, 324–330. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.05.018
35.
OzturkI., & UddinG. S. (2012). Causality among carbon emissions, energy consumption and growth in India. Ekonomska Istrazivanja/Economic Research, 25(3), 752–775. Retrieved from http://oet.unipu.hr/index.php?id=1068\nhttp://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eoh&AN=1342361&site=eds-live&scope=site
36.
PanayotouT. (1993). Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development. ILO Working Papers. Retrieved from Retrieved from http://ideas.repec.org/p/ilo/ilowps/292778.html
37.
PaoH. T., & TsaiC. M. (2011). Multivariate granger causality between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, FDI (foreign direct investment) and GDP (gross domestic product): Evidence from a panel of BRIC (Brazil, Russian Federation, India, and China) countries. Energy, 36(1), 685–693. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.09.041
38.
PengH., TanX., LiY., & HuL. (2016). Economic growth, foreign direct investment and CO2 emissions in China: A panel granger causality analysis. Sustainability, 8(233), 1–13. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3390/su8030233
39.
PesaranM. H., & ShinY. (1999). An autoregressive distributed lag modeling approach to cointegration analysis. In StromS. (Ed.), Econometrics and economic theory in 20th century: The ragnar frisch centennial symposium (Chapter 11). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40.
PesaranM. H., ShinY. & SmithR. J. (2001). Bound testing approaches to the analysis of level relationship. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16, 289–326. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jae.616
41.
RaniR., & KumarN. (2017). Does Nuclear Energy Consumption Improve Environment? Empirical Evidence From India. Nature Environment and Pollution Technology, 16(4), 1075–1079.
42.
RaniR., & KumarN. (2018). Causality between economic growth, carbon dioxide emissions, oil and coal consumption: empirical evidence from India. International Journal of Global Energy Issues, 41(5–6), 308–322.
43.
SabooriB., & SulaimanJ. (2013, November). CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries: A cointegration approach. Energy, 55, 813–822. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.04.038
44.
SabooriB., SulaimanJ. B., & MohdS. (2012). An empirical analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions in Indonesia: The role of energy consumption and foreign trade. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 4(2), 243–251. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v4n2p243
45.
SaidiK., & HammamiS. (2015). The impact of CO2 emissions and economic growth on energy consumption in 58 countries. Energy Reports, 1, 62–70. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2015.01.003
46.
Saint-PaulG. (1994). Discussion of ‘Pollution and Growth: What do We Know? In GoldinI., & WinterA. L. (Eds.), The economics of sustainable development (pp. 47–50). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
47.
SeldenT. M., & SongD. (1994). Environmental quality and development: is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emissions?Journal of Environmental Economics and management, 27(2), 147–162. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1994.1031
48.
ShahbazM., LeanH. H., & ShabbirM. S. (2012). Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Pakistan: Cointegration and granger causality. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(5), 2947–2953. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.015
49.
ShahbazM., LoganathanN., ZeshanM., & ZamanK. (2015). Does renewable energy consumption add in economic growth? An application of auto-regressive distributed lag model in Pakistan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 44, 576–585. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.017
50.
SongT., ZhengT., & TongL. (2008). An empirical test of the environmental Kuznets curve in China: A panel cointegration approach. China Economic Review, 19(3), 381–392. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2007.10.001
51.
SternD. I., & CommonM. S. (2001). Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for sulfur?Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 41, 162–178. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.2000.1132
52.
SternD. I., CommonM. S., & BarbierE. B. (1996). Economic growth and environmental degradation: The environmental Kuznets curve and sustainable development. World Development, 24(7), 1151–1160. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(96)00032-0
53.
TiwariA. K., ShahbazM., & HyeQ. M. A. (2013). The environmental Kuznets curve and the role of coal consumption in India: cointegration and causality analysis in an open economy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 18, 519–527.
54.
VidyarthiH. (2013). Energy consumption, carbon emissions and economic growth in India. World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 10, 278–287. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/WJSTSD-07-2013-0024
55.
VidyarthiH. (2014). An econometric study of energy consumption, carbon emissions and economic growth in South Asia: 1972–2009. World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustaninable Development, 11(3), 182–195. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/WJSTSD-08-2013-0037
56.
WangS. X., FuY. B., & ZhangZ. G. (2015). Population growth and the environmental Kuznets curve. China Economic Review, 36, 146–165. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2015.08.012
57.
Wolde-RufaelY. (2005). Energy demand and economic growth: The African experience. Journal of Policy Modeling, 27(8), 891–903. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2005.06.003
58.
World Bank Indicators (2016). The World Bank. NW Washington, DC, USA. Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/
59.
World Energy Outlook (2015). WEO-Related Reports. Paris, France: International Energy Agency. Retrieved from https://www.iea.org/weo/
