Higher education is all about people and management. The success of the higher educational institutions revolves largely around the quality of the research and the faculty. This emphasizes the need of a strong financial base to deliver a quality education to students. In the present scenario, which is characterized by intense information flow, dynamism, progress, growth, and continuous challenging environment, the higher educational institutions hold an important place. The present study focuses on exploring the relationship between human capital management and human resource development (HRD) climate. For the research purpose, two universities, University of Jammu and University of Kashmir, have been taken. The model derived by applying a confirmatory factor analysis in the present research study depicts a linkage between human capital management and HRD climate, and if applied in the institutions of higher education by customizing according to their needs and requirements, it would help in attaining the vision as perceived by Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry for 2030 in attaining overall excellence in higher education sector in India. So, it is very important to develop research focused universities with community participation which could deliver high quality research output and research focused graduates and lead to creating a NALANDA for the new millennia.
AgarwalT. (2002). Innovative human resource practices and HRD climate: A comparison of automobile and IT industries. In PareekU.Osman-GaniR. & RaoT. V. (Eds.), Human resource development in Asia (pp. 3–10). New Delhi: Oxford & IBH.
2.
AmaratungaD. & BaldryD. (2002). Moving from performance measurement to performance management. Facilities, 20(5/6), 217–223.
3.
ArmstrongM. & BaronA. (2002). Strategic HRM: The key to improved business performance. In Handbook of human resource management practice (pp. 215–439). Kogan: CIPD Publishing.
4.
AthreyaM. B. (1988). Integrated HRD system-intervention strategies. In RaoT. V.VermaK. K.KhandelwalA. K. & AbrahamE. (Eds.), Alternative approaches and strategies of human resources development (p. 378). Jaipur: Rawat Publications.
5.
BrockD. M. (1997). Strategy, autonomy, planning mode and effectiveness: A contingency study of business schools. International Journal of Education Management, 11(6), 248–259.
6.
ChenS. H.YangC. C. & ShiauJ. Y. (2006). The application of balanced scorecard in the performance evaluation of higher education. The TQM Magazine, 18(2), 190–205. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09544780610647892
7.
CullenJ.JoyceJ.HassallT. & BroadbentM. (2003). Quality in higher education: From monitoring to management. Quality Assurance in Education, 11(1), 5–14.
8.
DelkerS. G. B. (2003). Balanced scorecard: An instrument of change for facilities services. A project presented to the faculty of California State University, San Bernardino.
9.
FICCI (2014). Higher education in India: Moving towards global relevance and competitiveness: FICCI Higher Education Summit 2014. New Delhi: FICCI.
10.
GarverM. S. & MentzerJ. T. (1999). Logistics research methods: employing structural equation modeling to test for construct validity. Journal of business logistics, 20(1), 33.
11.
González–RomáV.PeiróJ. M.LloretS. & ZornozaA. (1999). The validity of collective climates. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 72(1), 25–40.
12.
HammondK.HarmonH.WebsterR. & RayburnM. (2004). University strategic marketing activities and business school performance. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 22(7), 732–741.
13.
HardjonoT. W. (1995). Ritmiek en Organisiatie Dynamiek [Rhythmics and Organizational Dynamics]. Deventer, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
14.
HooperD.CoughlanJ. & MullenM. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Articles, 2.
15.
HuL. & BentlerP. M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling, 6(1), 1–55.
16.
JainV. K. (2013). Competency mapping in Indian industries: A case study. International Journal of Emerging Research in Management & Technology, 2(10), 10–21. 9–21.
17.
KarathanosD. & KarathanosP. (2005). Applying the balanced scorecard to education. Journal of Education for Business, 80(4), 222–230.
18.
KingR. (1995). What is higher education for? Strategic dilemmas for the twenty first century university. Quality Assurance in Education, 3(4), 14–20.
19.
MarrewijkM. & TimmersJ. (2002). Human capital management: New possibilities in people management. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2–3), 171–184.
20.
MashhadiM. M.MohajeriK. & NayeriM. D. (2008). A quality oriented approach towards strategic positioning in higher education institutions. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 37(1), 338–342.
21.
MedskerG. J.WilliamsL. J. & HolahanP. J. (1994). A review of current practices for evaluating causal models in organizational behavior and human resources management research. Journal of Management, 20(2), 439–464.
22.
MishraP. & BhardwajG. (2002). Human resource development climate: An empirical study among private sector managers. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 38(1), 66.
23.
NMC Horizon Report (2017). Higher education edition, in partnership, Deloitte Global Human Capital Trends. ISBN 978-0-9977215-7–7.
24.
PapenhausenC. & EinsteinW. (2006). Insights from the balanced scorecard: Implementing the balanced scorecard at a college of business. Measuring Business Excellence, 10(3), 15–22.
25.
PillaiP. R. (2008). Influence of HRD climate on the learning orientation of bank employees. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 43(3), 406–418.
26.
RaoT. V. (1992). HRD in Voltas. In PareekU. & RaoT. V. (Eds.), Designing and managing human resource systems (pp. 352–354). New Delhi: Oxford & IBH.
27.
RaoT. V. (1999a). Evaluating the human resource function for business improvement. New Delhi: Response Books Pvt. Ltd.
28.
RaoT. V. (1999b). HRD audit. New Delhi: Response Books (A Division of SAGE Publications).
29.
RaoT. V. (2008). HRD Score Card 2500: Based on HRD Audit. SAGE Publications India.
30.
RaoT. V. & AbrahamE. (1986). Human resource development climate in Indian organisations. In: RaoT. V. & PereiraD. F. (Eds.), Recent experiences in human resources development (pp. 70–98). New Delhi: Oxford & IBH.
31.
RigdonE. E. (1996). CFI versus RMSEA: A comparison of two fit indexes for structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 3(4), 369–379.
32.
SaraswatiS. (2010). Human resources development climate: An empirical study. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 1(2), 174–179.
33.
SolkheA. & ChaudharyN. (2011). HRD climate and job satisfaction: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Computing and Business Research, 2(2), 1–20.
34.
SrimannarayanaM. (2001). HRD climate in a software organization. HRD Newsletter, 2(3), 6–14.
35.
SrimannarayanaM. (2008). Human resources development climate in India. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 44(2), 248–255.
36.
SrimannarayanaM. (2009). Measurement of human resource activities in India. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 45(2), 265–276.
37.
StewartA. C. & Carpenter-HubinJ. (2001). The Balanced Scorecard. Project Management Journal, 32(1), 158–167.
38.
StewartT. & RuckdeschelC. (1998). Intellectual capital: The new wealth of organizations. Performance Improvement, 37(7), 56–59.
39.
SutherlandT. (2000). Designing and implementing an academic scorecard. Accounting Education News, 15, 11–15.
40.
UmashankerV. & DuttaK. (2007). Balanced scorecards in managing higher education institutions: An Indian perspective. International Journal of Education Management, 21(1), 54–67.
41.
VenkateswaranK. P. S. (1997). A note on HRD climate. Vikalpa, 22(1), 51–53.
42.
WilsonB. (1996). Quality in Universities, Sir Robert Menzies Oration, 4 October 1995. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 18(2), 149–158.
43.
WilsonC.HagartyD. & GauthierJ. (2004). Results using the balanced scorecard in the public sector. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 6(1), 53–64.
