Unethical pro-organizational behavior (UPB), a phenomenon that has emerged through corporate misconduct worldwide, stands as a challenge to organizational and societal sustainability. Despite its impact, the influence of gender on UPB and other related psychological variables remains underexplored. This study tries to understand the role of gender, particularly on how UPB, often related to masculine traits, is affected by psychological ownership and psychological contract (relational). Given the predominantly patriarchal society of India, this study gains relevance as ethical decision-making might be affected by traditional gender roles, where nurturance, frequently associated with women, might have a say. A sample of 300 employees working as sales executives, team leads, and managers from various Ed-tech institutes in India were selected and employed the UPB scale, psychological contract scale, and psychological ownership scale. The data were then subjected to correlation, regression, t-test, and moderation using SPSS-24 and Hayes Process Macro. Results revealed a significant association between UPB, psychological ownership, and psychological contract, where the latter two significantly predicted UPB. A significant gender difference was found among all three variables, where the relationship between psychological ownership and UPB was significantly higher among males. These findings are then explained using various theoretical and historical antecedents and ultimately shedding light on what needs to be done for its alleviation.
AggarwalU., & BhargavaS. (2010). Predictors and outcomes of relational and transactional psychological contract. Psychological Studies, 55(3), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-010-0033-2
2.
AliyuM. O., & IsiakaB. S. (2019). Promoting ethical behaviours in Nigerian public universities: The effect of psychological ownership. Kelaniya Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.4038/kjhrm.v14i1.50
3.
AlqhaiwiZ. O. (2024). A bright side to unethical pro-organizational behavior: Improving work performance by satisfying psychological needs. Journal of Business Research, 184, 114879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114879
4.
AndersonN., & SchalkR. (1998). The psychological contract in retrospect and prospect. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 637–647. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3100280
5.
AndiappanM. (2022). Causing harm but doing good: Recognizing and overcoming the burden of necessary evil enactment in healthcare service professions. Health Services Management Research, 36(2), 153–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/09514848221109833
6.
AzimA. M. M., HassanM. S., ZaidD. S., & DaudM. A. (2020). The influence of supervisor support, organizational trust on workplace deviant behavior: Do psychological contract matter?International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 10(2), 116–132.
7.
BemS. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88(4), 354. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v10-i2/6895
8.
BlauP. M. (1964). Justice in social exchange. Sociological Inquiry, 34(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1964.tb00583.x
9.
CascioJ., & PlantE. A. (2015). Prospective moral licensing: Does anticipating doing good later allow you to be bad now?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 110–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.09.009
10.
CharnessG., & GneezyU. (2012). Strong evidence for gender differences in risk taking. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83(1), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.06.007
11.
ChaudharyR., SinghA., & SrivastavaS. (2023). Does workplace spirituality promote ethical voice: Examining the mediating effect of psychological ownership and moderating influence of moral identity. Journal of Business Ethics, 195, 779–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05558-y
12.
ChengY. (2021). The effect of psychological contract combined with stress and health on employees’ management behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.667302
13.
CorkeryM. (2016, September8). Wells Fargo fined $185 million for fraudulently opening accounts. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/09/business/dealbook/wells-fargo-fined-for-years-of-harm-to-customers.html
14.
CurtisG. (2008, December4). The financial crisis and the collapse of ethical behavior. The Big Picture. https://ritholtz.com/2008/12/the-financial-crisis-and-the-collapse-of-ethical-behavior/
15.
DadaboyevS. M. U., PaekS., & ChoiS.-W. (2023). Do gender, age and tenure matter when behaving unethically for organizations: Meta-analytic review on organizational identity and unethical pro-organizational behavior. Baltic Journal of Management, 19, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/bjm-12-2022-0480
16.
DanilwanY., IsnainiD. B. Y., & PratamaI. (2020). Psychological contract violation: A bridge between unethical behavior and trust. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(7). https://doi.org/10.31289/jbi.v1i1.1057
17.
De CremerD., & VandekerckhoveW. (2017). Managing unethical behavior in organizations: The need for a behavioral business ethics approach. Journal of Management & Organization, 23(3), 437–455. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2016.4
18.
DevikaJ. (2024). Caregiver vs citizen? (pp. 322–334). Routledge EBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032638478-31
19.
DimitriouC. K., & DucetteJ. P. (2018). An analysis of the key determinants of hotel employees’ ethical behavior. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 34, 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2017.12.002
20.
EaglyA. H., & WoodW. (2012). Social role theory. In Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 458–476). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249222.n49
21.
EckerdS., HillJ., BoyerK. K., DonohueK., & WardP. T. (2013). The relative impact of attribute, severity, and timing of psychological contract breach on behavioral and attitudinal outcomes. Journal of Operations Management, 31(7–8), 567–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2013.06.003
22.
EyounK., ChenH., AyounB., & KhliefatA. (2020). The relationship between purpose of performance appraisal and psychological contract: Generational differences as a moderator. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 86(1), 102449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102449
23.
FatimaT., & ElbannaS. (2023). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) implementation: A review and a research agenda towards an integrative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 183(1), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05047-8
24.
FreeseC., & SchalkR. (2008). How to measure the psychological contract? A critical criteria-based review of measures. South African Journal of Psychology, 38(2), 269–286. 10.1177/008124630803800202
25.
GardnerD. G., PierceJ. L., & PengH. (2020). Social exchange and psychological ownership as complementary pathways from psychological contract fulfillment to organizational citizenship behaviors. Personnel Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-12-2019-0688
26.
GigolT. (2021). Gender differences in engagement in unethical pro-organizational behavior—Two studies in Poland. Sustainability, 13, 39. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13010039
27.
GuptaS., WalkerE. D.II, & SwansonN. J. (2011). Ethical behaviour of graduate business students: An examination of the effect of age, gender, GPA, and work experience. Southern Journal of Business and Ethics, 3, 137–151.
28.
HakimD., & EwingJ. (2015). Volkswagen’s soft-ware was ‘illegal defeat device,’ German regulator ways. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/24/business/international/volkswagens-softwareuse-was-illegal-german-regulator-rules.html
29.
HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Publications.
30.
HerreraJ., & Heras-RosasC. D. L. (2021). The organizational commitment in the company and its relationship with the psychological contract. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 609211. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.609211
31.
HoggM. A. (2016). Social identity theory (pp. 3–17). Springer International Publishing.
32.
HottenR. (2015, December10). Volkswagen: The scandal explained. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-34324772
33.
HsuL. C. (2022). The role of cognitive and affective trust on promoting unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies, 10(3), 600–616. https://doi.org/10.4236/jhrss.2022.103036
34.
HulugallaN., SekiM., YamadaK., & KakinakaM. (2024). Unethical behaviours, leadership, and gender in the village development programme: The case of rural Sri Lanka. Public Management Review, 27(3), 836–869. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2024.2382254
35.
IshakN. K., HaronH., & IsmailI. (2019). Ethical leadership, ethical climate and unethical behaviour in institutions of higher learning. KnE Social Sciences, 408–422. 10.18502/kss.v3i22.5064
36.
IshtiaqM., & ZebM. (2020). Psychological contract and employee engagement; The mediating role of job-stress, evidence from Pakistan. Business & Economic Review, 12(2), 83–108. https://doi.org/10.22547/BER/12.2.4
37.
JafriH. (2016). Influence of psychological ownership on psychological contract breach. International Journal of Indian Psychology, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.25215/0302.128
38.
JeskeD., & AxtellC. M. (2018). The nature of relationships in e-internships: A matter of the psychological contract, communication and relational investment. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 34(2), 113–121. https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2018a14
39.
JiangH., ChenY., SunP., & YangJ. (2017). The relationship between authoritarian leadership and employees’ deviant workplace behaviors: The mediating effects of psychological contract violation and organizational cynicism. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 732. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00732
40.
JiangW., LiangB., & WangL. (2022). The double-edged sword effect of unethical pro-organizational behavior: The relationship between unethical pro-organizational behavior, organizational citizenship behavior, and work effort. Journal of Business Ethics, 183(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-05034-5
41.
JnaneswarK., & RanjitG. (2021). Organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviour: The mediating role of psychological ownership. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 9(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-01-2021-0012
42.
KennedyJ. A., KrayL. J., & KuG. (2017). A social-cognitive approach to understanding gender differences in negotiator ethics: The role of moral identity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 138, 28–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.11.003
43.
KnappJ. R., SmithB. R., & SprinkleT. A. (2014). Clarifying the relational ties of organizational belonging: Understanding the roles of perceived insider status, psychological ownership, and organizational identification. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 21(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051814529826
44.
KUG., KennedyJ., & KrayL. (2017, March8). Are women more ethical than men?Greater Good. https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/are_women_more_ethical_than_men
45.
KumarU. P. S., JaiswalC., KumarN., AhmadM., & SureshS. (2024). Understanding cognitive pathways of unethical pro-organizational behaviour: Insights from socio-cognitive theories and counteractive interventions. In Principles and clinical interventions in social cognition (pp. 325–343). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-1265-0.ch019
46.
LandsheerJ. A., & Van Den WittenboerG. (2015). Unbalanced 2 x 2 factorial designs and the interaction effect: A troublesome combination. PLoS One, 10(3), e0121412. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121412
47.
LasthuizenK., & BadarK. (2023). Ethical reasoning at work: A cross-country comparison of gender and age differences. Administrative Sciences, 13(5), 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13050136
48.
LawlerE. J., & YoonJ. (1996). Commitment in exchange relations: Test of a theory of relational cohesion. American Sociological Review, 61(1), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096408
49.
LeeH. W., & LiuC. H. (2009). The relationship among achievement motivation, psychological contract and work attitudes. Social Behaviour and Personality: An International Journal, 37(3), 321–328. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2009.37.3.321
MarwahaK. (2017). Corporate governance and whistle blowing in India: Promises or reality?International Journal of Law and Management, 59(3), 430–441. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlma-12-2015-0064
52.
MathiesenK., & NeslenA. (2018, February14). VW scandal caused nearly 1m tonnes of extra pollution, analysis shows. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/sep/22/vw-scandal-caused-nearly-1m-tonnes-of-extra-pollution-analysis-shows
McleanB., & ElkindP. (2003). The smartest guys in the room: The amazing rise and scandalous fall of Enron. Portfolio.
55.
NarcikaraE. B. (2017). Psychological ownership in family business in the light of social identity theory. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 7(9), 520–545. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/zabhn
NevilleL., & FiskG. M. (2019). Getting to excess: Psychological entitlement and negotiation attitudes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(4), 555–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-9557-6
58.
NingN., & ZhaoyiL. (2017). Psychological contract breach, organizational disidentification, and employees’ unethical behavior: Organizational ethical climate as moderator. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 45(9), 1409–1424. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.6708
59.
PanQ. (2023). Study on the effect of psychological contract on employee knowledge sharing in virtual platforms. In SHS web of conferences (Vol. 152, p. 04007). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202315204007
60.
PierceJ. L., KostovaT., & DirksK. T. (2001). Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 298–310. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378028
61.
PierceJ. L., KostovaT., & DirksK. T. (2003). The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology, 7(1), 84–107. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.1.84
62.
PierceJ. L., RubenfeldS. A., & MorganS. A. (1991). Employee ownership: A conceptual model of process and effects. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 121–144. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4279000
63.
PohlS., BertrandF., & ErgenC. (2016). Psychological contracts and their implications for job outcomes: A social exchange view. Military Psychology, 28(6), 406–417. https://doi.org/10.1037/mil0000127
64.
RanY., & ZhouH. (2023). High-commitment work systems, organizational psychological ownership, and unethical pro-organizational behavior: A nonlinear mediation model. Current Psychology, 43(13), 11526–11537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05409-z
65.
RimplerA., KiersH. A. L., & RavenzwaaijD. van. (2025). To interact or not to interact: The pros and cons of including interactions in linear regression models. Behavior Research Methods, 57(3). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-025-02613-6
66.
RolisonJ. J., & ShentonJ. (2020). How much risk can you stomach? Individual differences in the tolerance of perceived risk across gender and risk domain. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 33(1), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2144
67.
RousseauD. M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Sage Publications.
68.
RousseauD. M. (2004). Psychological contracts in the workplace: Understanding the ties that motivate. Academy of Management Perspectives, 18(1), 120–127. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2004.12689213
69.
SafariA., & AlbaumG. (2019). Transactional or relational exchange theory in B2C marketing: An agenda for a different type of relational exchange theory. Journal of Customer Behaviour, 18(2), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1362/147539219x15633616548579
70.
Santa Clara University. (2015). Men & women; Justice & compassion. https://www.scu.edu/ethics/ethics-resources/ethical-decision-making/men–women-justice–compassion/
71.
ScheinerC. W., BaccarellaC. V., BessantJ., & VoigtK. I. (2018). Participation motives, moral disengagement, and unethical behaviour in idea competitions. International Journal of Innovation Management, 22(06), 1850043. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919618500433
72.
SebastianS., GeorgeA. P., & AishwaryaN. (2019). Psychological contract and organisational commitment of the employees in Indian aviation sector. Asian Journal of Management, 10(2), 109. https://doi.org/10.5958/2321-5763.2019.00018.0
73.
SeçkinS. N., & ÇobanR. (2018). A research on work life quality, psychological contract and psychological ownership relationship in the context of social exchange theory. Yorum-Yönetim-Yöntem, 6, 7–17.
74.
ShuklaA. (2019). Soldier or actor? The role of psychological ownership as a marker for genuine citizenship behaviour. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 27(1), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-08-2017-1214
75.
SimhaA., & ParboteeahK. P. (2020). The big 5 personality traits and willingness to justify unethical behavior—A cross-national examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 167, 451–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04142-7
76.
SprottD. E., CzellarS., & SpangenbergE. R. (2009). The importance of a general measure of brand engagement on market behaviour: Development and validation of a scale. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(1), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.46.1.92
77.
StearneyL. M. (1994). Feminism, ecofeminism, and the maternal archetype: Motherhood as a feminine universal. Communication Quarterly, 42(2), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379409369923
78.
The Glass Hammer. (2014, September16). Ethics at work: Are women generally more ethical than men in the workplace?https://theglasshammer.com/2014/09/ethics-at-work-are-women-generally-more-ethical-than-men-in-the-workplace/
79.
UmphressE. E., BinghamJ. B., & MitchellM. S. (2010). Unethical behavior in the name of the company: The moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(4), 769–780. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019214
80.
WangH., ZhangY., LiP., & HenryS. E. (2023). You raise me up and I reciprocate: Linking empowering leadership to organizational citizenship behavior and unethical pro-organizational behavior. Applied Psychology, 72(2), 718–742. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12398
81.
WigginsJ. (2018). Can consumers perceive collective psychological ownership of an organization?In Psychological ownership and consumer behavior (pp. 177–194). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77158-8_11
82.
YıldızB., AlpkanL., AteşH., & SezenB. (2015). Determinants of constructive deviance: The mediator role of psychological ownership. International Business Research, 8(4), 107–107.
83.
ZhangY., LiuG., ZhangL., XuS., & CheungM. W. L. (2021). Psychological ownership: A meta-analysis and comparison of multiple forms of attachment in the workplace. Journal of Management, 47(3), 745–770. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320917195
84.
ZhangY., WaldmanD. A., HanY., & LiX. (2015). Paradoxical leader behaviours in people management: Antecedents and consequences. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 538–566. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.1060
85.
ZhangM., ZhaoL., & ChenZ. (2021). Research on the relationship between high-commitment work systems and employees’ unethical pro-organizational behavior: The moderating role of balanced reciprocity beliefs. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 776904. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.776904
86.
ZhaoH., XuY., & WangX. (2022). Greenwashing in workplace: The influencing mechanism of psychological contract fulfillment and the moderating role of ethical work climate. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 48(3), 420–433. https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480221109551
