This article is based on a comprehensive investigation of the lived experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersexual, and asexual plus (LGBTQIA+) individuals working in diverse fields within the urban Indian context. The study contributes to the mainstream discourse on diversity and inclusion (D&I) from the gender lens. It reveals how organizational policies, societal attitudes, and cultural norms in India influence the identity, family, and peer relationships, educational and workplace environments, support systems, and coping mechanisms of LGBTQIA+ professionals. Utilizing a qualitative research approach, data were obtained from interviews published on the “Feminism in India” website. Thematic analysis revealed seven themes, shedding light on the marginalization and challenges faced by LGBTQIA+ communities, including the exclusion of trans individuals within feminist spaces and inadequate representation in Pride events. This research investigates nascent experiences within social and professional contexts and narrows down the focus to the LGBTQIA+ community in India. In this study, intersectionality theory is integrated to explain how sexual orientation merges with gender, caste, class, and religion to establish workplace inclusion, equity, and belonging. The themes identified in the study reveal that it is the social, personal, and structural relationships that influence the lives of LGBTQIA+ persons in urban India. Organizations and policymakers can only minimize discrimination and support positive development upon understanding these experiences.
AroraL., BhujangP. M., & SivakamiM. (2022). Understanding discrimination against LGBTQIA+ patients in Indian hospitals using a human rights perspective: An exploratory qualitative study. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters, 29(2), 2104678.
2.
BaasM. (2023). Queer India “on paper”–decriminalization, recognition and visibility of sexual diversity. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 42(5), 610–624.
3.
BanerjeeD., & RaoT. S. (2021). “The graying minority”: Lived experiences and psychosocial challenges of older transgender adults during the COVID-19 pandemic in India, a qualitative exploration. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, 604472.
4.
BlanckP., HyseniF., & WiseF. A. (2021). Diversity and inclusion in the American legal profession: Discrimination and bias reported by lawyers with disabilities and lawyers who identify as LGBTQ+. American Journal of Law & Medicine, 47(1), 9–61.
5.
BowlingJ., DodgeB., BanikS., RodriguezI., MengeleS. R., HerbenickD., Guerra-ReyesL., SandersS., DangeA., & AnandV. (2016). Perceived health concerns among sexual minority women in Mumbai, India: An exploratory qualitative study. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 18(7), 826–840.
6.
BraunV., & ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
7.
Bryant-LeesK. B., & KiteM. E. (2021). Evaluations of LGBT job applicants: Consequences of applying “out”. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 40(7), 874–891.
8.
ClarkA. F., SuhJ., & BaeK. B. (2022). Protected, but not included? The role of workplace inclusion for sexual and gender minorities in the federal service. Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs, 8(3), 323–348.
9.
ColganF., WrightT., CreeganC., & McKearneyA. (2009). Equality and diversity in the public services: Moving forward on lesbian, gay and bisexual equality?Human Resource Management Journal, 19(3), 280–301.
10.
CrenshawK. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics (p. 139). University of Chicago Legal Forum.
11.
CunninghamG. B. (2011). The LGBT advantage: Examining the relationship among sexual orientation diversity, diversity strategy, and performance. Sport Management Review, 14(4), 453–461.
12.
DennissenM., BenschopY., & van Den BrinkM. (2020). Rethinking diversity management: An intersectional analysis of diversity networks. Organization Studies, 41(2), 219–240.
13.
EganM. (2018). LGBTI staff, and diversity within the Australian accounting profession. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 9(5), 595–614.
14.
FletcherL., & MarvellR. (2023). Furthering transgender inclusion in the workplace: Advancing a new model of allyship intentions and perceptions. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(9), 1726–1756.
15.
FontanaE. (2020). Managing diversity through transgender inclusion in developing countries: A collaborative corporate social responsibility initiative from Bangladesh. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(6), 2548–2562.
16.
Fosch-VillarongaE., PoulsenA., SøraaR. A., & CustersB. H. M. (2021). A little bird told me your gender: Gender inferences in social media. Information Processing & Management, 58(3), 102541.
17.
GisondiM. A., KeyesT., ZuckerS., & BumgardnerD. (2023). Teaching LGBTQ+ health, a web-based faculty development course: Program evaluation study using the RE-AIM framework. JMIR Medical Education, 9(1), e47777.
18.
GoldbergA. E. (2023). LGBTQ-parent families: Diversity, intersectionality, and social context. Current Opinion in Psychology, 49, 101517.
19.
HaleyC. M., MacriD., PerezH. L., & SchwartzS. B. (2022). LGBTQ+ and dental education: Analyzing the present and recommendations for the future. Journal of Dental Education, 86(9), 1191–1197.
20.
Holmes IVO. (2010). Redefining the way we look at diversity: A review of recent diversity and inclusion findings in organizational research. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 29(1), 131–135.
21.
HossainM., AtifM., AhmedA., & MiaL. (2020). Do LGBT workplace diversity policies create value for firms?Journal of Business Ethics, 167(4), 775–791.
22.
IgboanugoS., YangJ., & BigelowP. (2022). Building a framework for an inclusive workplace culture. The International Journal of Information, Diversity, & Inclusion, 6(3), 52–67.
23.
IsraelT., BettergarciaJ. N., DelucioK., AvellarT. R., HarknessA., & GoodmanJ. A. (2017). Reactions of law enforcement to LGBTQ diversity training. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 28(2), 197–226.
24.
JinD., ChenH., & QiR. (2024). Diversity, equity and inclusion in employee-queer customer interactions in the hospitality service setting: Including multiple stakeholders’ perspectives. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 36(6), 1991–2010.
25.
JohnstonD., & MalinaM. A. (2008). Managing sexual orientation diversity: The impact on firm value. Group & Organization Management, 33(5), 602–625.
26.
JohriS., CarnevaleM., PorterL., ZivianA., KourantidouM., MeyerE. L., SeeversJ., & SkubelR. A. (2021). Pathways to justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion in marine science and conservation. Frontiers in Marine Science, 8, 696180.
27.
KaplanS. (2022). “Bringing your full self to work”: Fashioning LGBTQ bankers on Wall Street. Anthropology of Work Review, 43(1), 5–15.
28.
KattaS., BadgerA., GrahamM., HowsonK., Ustek-SpildaF., & BertoliniA. (2020). (Dis) embeddedness and (de) commodification: COVID-19, Uber, and the unravelling logics of the gig economy. Dialogues in Human Geography, 10(2), 203–207.
29.
KotilogluS. (2023). Exploring how organizational performance feedback influences corporate social responsibility (CSR): The moderating role of LGBT inclusion. Journal of Strategy and Management, 16(2), 378–394.
30.
KrutkowskiS., Taylor-HarmanS., & GuptaK. (2020). De-biasing on university campuses in the age of misinformation. Reference Services Review, 48(1), 113–128.
31.
LaVoiN. M., & GlassfordS. L. (2022). “This is our family”: LGBTQ Family narratives in online NCAA DI coaching biographies. Journal of Homosexuality, 69(10), 1631–1654.
32.
Le BlancR. G., & JacksonS. J. (2007). Sexuality as cultural diversity within sport organisations. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 2(1–2), 119–133.
33.
LeeC. (2020). Courageous leaders: Promoting and supporting diversity in school leadership development. Management in Education, 34(1), 5–15.
34.
LundinM., & BombaciS. (2023). Making outdoor field experiences more inclusive for the LGBTQ+ community. Ecological Applications, 33(5), e2771.
35.
MasonP. (2005). Visual data in applied qualitative research: Lessons from experience. Qualitative Research, 5(3), 325–346.
36.
NarrainA. (2004). The articulation of rights around sexuality and health: Subaltern queer cultures in India in the era of Hindutva. Health and Human Rights, 142–164.
37.
NoronhaE., BishtN. S., & D’CruzP. (2022). From fear to courage: Indian lesbians’ and gays’ quest for inclusive ethical organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 177(4), 779–797.
38.
PattonM. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage Publications.
39.
PeralesF., AblazaC., & ElkinN. (2022). Exposure to inclusive language and well-being at work among transgender employees in Australia, 2020. American Journal of Public Health, 112(3), 482–490.
40.
PhilipJ., & SoumyajaD. (2019). Workplace diversity and inclusion: Policies and best practices for organisations employing transgender people in India. International Journal of Public Policy, 15(3–4), 299–314.
41.
PulcherS., GuerciM., & KöllenT. (2020). Unions as institutional entrepreneurs: The contribution of unions to the diffusion and adaptation of LGBT diversity initiatives. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 33(3), 477–490.
42.
PulcherS., GuerciM., & KöllenT. (2022). When stakeholders claim differently for diversity management: Adopting lesbian, gay and bisexual-inclusive practices in Italy. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 60(4), 815–840.
43.
RennstamJ., & SullivanK. R. (2018). Peripheral inclusion through informal silencing and voice—A study of LGB officers in the Swedish police. Gender, Work & Organization, 25(2), 177–194.
44.
RhodesC. (2017). Ethical praxis and the business case for LGBT diversity: Political insights from Judith Butler and Emmanuel Levinas. Gender, Work & Organization, 24(5), 533–546.
45.
RileyD. M. (2008). LGBT-friendly workplaces in engineering. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 8(1), 19–23.
46.
RobertsS. P. (2020). The intersection of professionalism gay men, bodies and power. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 33(3), 491–501.
47.
SchnellA., GodleyJ., & BridelW. (2023). Attitudes towards LGBTQ+ inclusion in Canadian Figure Skating. The Open Sports Sciences Journal, 16(1).
48.
SpurdensB., & BloyceD. (2022). Beyond the rainbow: A discourse analysis of English sports organisations LGBT+ equality diversity and inclusion policies. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 14(3), 507–527.
49.
StraussA. L., & CorbinJ. M. (1997). Grounded theory in practice. Sage Publications.
50.
SuenY. T., ChanR. C., & BadgettM. L. (2021). The experiences of sexual and gender minorities in employment: Evidence from a large-scale survey of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex people in China. The China Quarterly, 245, 142–164.
51.
TayarM. (2017). Ranking LGBT inclusion: Diversity ranking systems as institutional archetypes. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration, 34(2), 198–210.
52.
ThomasC., MacMillanC., McKinnonM., TorabiH., Osmond-McLeodM., SwavleyE., ArmerT., & DoyleK. (2021). Seeing and overcoming the complexities of intersectionality. Challenges, 12(1), 5.
53.
ThomasG., & MacnabN. (2022). Intersectionality, diversity, community and inclusion: Untangling the knots. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 26(3), 227–244.
54.
ThompsonS., RohwerderB., & MukherjeeD. (2023). Disability, religion, and gender: Exploring experiences of exclusion in India through an intersectional lens. Social Inclusion, 11(4), 314–325.
55.
UN Women. (2018). Turning promises into action: Gender equality in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. UN. http://www.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/sdg-report
56.
WalserJ., FletcherT., & MagrathR. (2022). Fan attitudes towards sexual minorities in German men’s football. Leisure Studies, 41(3), 356–371.
57.
WangJ., GundersonM., & WicksD. (2018). The earnings effect of sexual orientation: British evidence from worker-firm matched data. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 56(4), 744–769.
