This study aims to examine how Buddhist mindfulness meditation influences the ethical temperament of its practitioner at the workplace. By adopting a constructivist grounded theory approach, we found six elements of Buddhist mindfulness meditation and three mechanisms underlying the ethical temperament of the participants at the workplace. Our findings suggest that Buddhist mindfulness meditation helps practitioners pursue a spiritual purpose guided by moral principles. Moreover, it helps them to overcome temptations and pressures against moral actions and makes them sensitive to the wellbeing of others. This study advances the literature of Buddhist principles and workplace ethics by identifying the mechanism of ethical behavior at the workplace influenced by mindfulness meditation.
Anālayo. (2010). Satipaţţhāna: The direct path to realization. Windhorse Publications.
2.
BartlettL., MartinA., NeilA. L., MemishK., OtahalP., KilpatrickM., & SandersonK. (2019). A systematic review and meta-analysis of workplace mindfulness training randomized controlled trials. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 24(1), 108.
3.
BreckenridgeJ., & JonesD. (2009). Demystifying theoretical sampling in grounded theory research. Grounded Theory Review, 8(2). http://groundedtheoryreview.com/2009/06/30/847/
4.
executive.dhamma.org. (n.d.). Carolyn Crowley. Vipassana meditation course for business executives. www.executive.dhamma.org/en/docs/misc/execbrochure.pdf
5.
CharmazK. (1995). The body, identity, and self: Adapting to impairment. Sociological Quarterly, 36(4), 657–680.
6.
CharmazK. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In DenzinN. K. & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd Ed., pp. 509–535). Sage Publications.
7.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications.
8.
CharmazK. (2012). Mixing or adding methods? An exploration and critique. In DenzinN. K. & GiardinaM. D. (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and the politics of advocacy (pp. 123–143). Left Coast Press.
ComerD. R., & VegaG. (2011). The relationship between the personal ethical threshold and workplace spirituality. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 8(1), 23–40.
11.
CompsonJ., & MonteiroL. (2016). Still exploring the middle path: A response to commentaries. Mindfulness, 7(2), 548–564.
12.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience (Vol. 1990). Harper & Row.
13.
DavidsonR. J., & KaszniakA. W. (2015). Conceptual and methodological issues in research on mindfulness and meditation. American Psychologist, 70(7), 581.
14.
DhimanS. (2008). Cultivating mindfulness: The Buddhist art of paying attention to attention. Interbeing, 2(2), 35–52.
15.
Digha Nikaya 22. (2013). Maha-satipatthana Sutta: The Great Frames of Reference (DN 22), translated from the Pali by Thanissaro Bhikkhu. Access to Insight (BCBS Edition), November30, 2013. http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/dn/dn.22.0.than.html
16.
EmmonsR. A. (2000). Spirituality and intelligence: Problems and prospects. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 10(1), 57–64.
17.
FestingerL. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance (Vol. 2). Stanford University Press.
18.
GilpinR. (2008). The use of Theravāda Buddhist practices and perspectives in mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. Contemporary Buddhism, 9(2), 227–251.
19.
GrossmanP., & Van DamN. T. (2011). Mindfulness, by any other name…: trials and tribulations of sati in western psychology and science. Contemporary Buddhism, 12(1), 219–239.
20.
GubaE. G., & LincolnY. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Handbook of qualitative research (Vol. 2, pp. 163–194, 105). Sage Publications.
21.
HoodR. W.Jr (2013). Methodological diversity in the psychology of religion and spirituality.
22.
Kabat-ZinnJ. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: Past, present, and future.
23.
KeownD. (2013). Buddhism: A very short introduction (Vol. 3). Oxford University Press.
24.
LindahlJ. R. (2015). Why right mindfulness might not be right for mindfulness. Mindfulness, 6(1), 57–62.
25.
McGheeP., & GrantP. (2017). The transcendent influence of spirituality on ethical action in organizations. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 14(2), 160–178.
26.
MilgramS. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. Harper Colophon Books.
27.
MonteiroL. M., MustenR. F., & CompsonJ. (2015). Traditional and contemporary mindfulness: Finding the middle path in the tangle of concerns. Mindfulness, 6(1), 1–13.
28.
MorseJ. (2000). Determining sample size. Qualitative Health Research, 10, 3–5.
29.
NanamoliB., & BuddhaghosaB. (2003). Visuddhimagga: The path of purification.
30.
PayuttoP. A. (2011). The brief Introduction of the Buddha-Dhamma. Phli-Dhamma Publishing.
31.
PayuttoP. A. (2016). Buddha-Dhamma: The extended version. Dhamma in Trend.
32.
PopeC., & MaysN. (2009). Critical reflections on the rise of qualitative research. BMJ, 339, b3425.
33.
PrimeauxP., & VegaG. (2002). Operationalizing Maslow: Religion and flow as business partners. Journal of Business Ethics, 38(1), 97–108.
34.
PurserR., & LoyD. (2013). Beyond mcmindfulness. Huffington Post, 1(7), 13.
35.
PurserR. E. (2015). Clearing the muddled path of traditional and contemporary mindfulness: A response to Monteiro, Musten, and Compson. Mindfulness, 6(1), 23–45.
36.
RawlinsonA. (1998). The book of enlightened masters: Western teachers in Eastern traditions. Open Court.
37.
RestJ. R. (1994). Background: Theory and research. In Moral development in the professions (pp. 13–38). Psychology Press.
38.
SayadawV. M. (1985). Brahmavihara Dhamma. U Min Swe tr. Republic of the Union of Burma.
39.
SchwandtT. A. (1994). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In Handbook of qualitative research (Vol. 1, pp. 118–137). Sage Publications.
40.
SobalJ. (2001). Sample extensiveness in qualitative nutrition education research. Journal of Nutrition Education, 33, 184–192.
41.
SpohnW. C. (1997). Spirituality and ethics: Exploring the connections. Theological Studies, 58(1), 109–123.
42.
StraussA., & CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research. Sage Publications.
43.
SuriyankietkaewS., & KantamaraP. (2019). Business ethics and spirituality for corporate sustainability: A Buddhism perspective. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 16(3), 264–289.
44.
TheraN. (1962). The heart of Buddhist meditation. Weiser.
45.
ThomsonS. B. (2010). Sample size and grounded theory. Journal of Administration and Governance, 5(1), 45–52.
46.
TitmussC. (2013). The Buddha of mindfulness. The politics of mindfulness.
47.
TreviñoL. K., WeaverG. R., & ReynoldsS. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32(6), 951–990.
48.
Van GordonW., ShoninE., GriffithsM. D., & SinghN. N. (2015). There is only one mindfulness: Why science and Buddhism need to work together. Mindfulness, 6(1), 49–56.
VitellS. J., BingM. N., DavisonH. K., AmmeterA. P., GarnerB. L., & NovicevicM. M. (2009). Religiosity and moral identity: The mediating role of self-control. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(4), 601–613.
51.
VuM. C., & GillR. (2018). Is there corporate mindfulness? An exploratory study of Buddhist-enacted spiritual leaders’ perspectives and practices. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 15(2), 155–177.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
