Kinabalu Geopark is located in Sabah, Malaysia, Borneo, and it will be the second Geopark landmark in Malaysia. The study aimed to explore the implications of the development of Kinabalu Geopark to community well-being. The central research question is: “How does Kinabalu Geopark development enhance and promote community well-being from the perspectives of policymakers?” This study employs a qualitative research approach guided by an interpretivist paradigm by interviewing 15 policymakers. Findings indicated three key themes of community well-being, (i) economic well-being, (ii) social well-being, and (iii) criticality of engagement initiatives. Economic well-being refers to how the development of Kinabalu Geopark would help to strengthen the local economy by providing more employment and business opportunities. Social well-being relates to how communities will benefit from the social stability and strong relationships formed by government sectors, local community leaders, and society. Then, engagement initiative by the policymakers is crucial to ensure the projects’ success, community leadership, and community-wide engagement activities are essential. As a result of efforts to maintain geological characteristics and natural resources, geopark development may not only give prospects for local economic and social growth, but it may also expand educational programs, research, and development for scientific and tourism objectives.
AbdullahM. I. U. (2019). Kinabalu geopark: Locals can go on with daily activities, assures geologist. New Straits Times. https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2019/06/495434/kinabalu-geopark-locals-can-go-daily-activities-assures-geologist
2.
AgarwalaM., AtkinsonG., FryB. P., HomewoodK., MouratoS., RowcliffeJ. M., WallaceG., & Milner-GullandE. J. (2014). Assessing the relationship between human well-being and ecosystem services: A review of frameworks. Conservation and Society, 12(4), 437–449.
3.
AndersonR. E. (2017). Community functioning that fosters sustainable well-being. InPhillipsR. & WongC.(Eds.), Handbook of community well-being research (pp. 3–10). Springer.
4.
ArnsteinS. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planner, 35(4), 216–224.
5.
BagulP., & BaharA. (2009). Success of ecotourism sites and local community participation in Sabah. Victoria University of Wellington.
6.
BeauchampE., WoodhouseE., ClementsT., & Milner-GullandE. J. (2018). “Living a good life”: Conceptualizations of well-being in a conservation context in Cambodia. Ecology and Society, 23(2).
7.
BramstonP., PrettyG., & ChipuerH. (2002). Unravelling subjective quality in life: An investigation of individual and community determinants. Social Indicators Research, 59(3), 261–274.
8.
BraunV., & ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
9.
ChanP. Y. (2016). Community participation in heritage management: A case in Macau. Master dissertation, Columbia University.
10.
ChenY., CottamE., & LinZ. (2020). The effect of resident-tourist value co-creation on residents’ well-being. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 44, 30–37.
11.
CorbinJ., & StraussA. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). SAGE Publication.
12.
Council on Social Work Education (CSWE). (2016). Working definition of economic well-being.
13.
Daily Express. (2019). Tourism among Sabah’s fastest growing sectors. https://www.dailyexpress.com.my/news/132728/tourism-among-sabah-s-fastest-growing-sectors/
14.
DalyJ., KellehearA., & GliksmanM. (1997). The public health researcher: A methodological approach. Oxford University Press.
15.
DawT. M., CoulthardS., CheungW. W. L., BrownK., AbungeC., GalafassiD., PetersonG. D., McClanahanT. R., OmukotoJ. O., & MunyiL. (2015). Evaluating taboo trade-offs in ecosystem services and human well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(22), 6949–6954.
16.
DolnicarS., YanamandramV., & CliffK. (2012). The contribution of vacations to quality of life. Annals of Tourism Research, 39(1), 59–83.
17.
DousinO. (2017). Work-life balance practices in the healthcare industry: The case of East Malaysia(Doctoral dissertation, RMIT University).
18.
DousinO., CollinsN., & KlerB. K. (2021). The experience of work-life balance for women doctors and nurses in Malaysia. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 60(2).
ElkingtonJ., & RowlandsI. H. (1999). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Alternatives Journal, 25(4), 42.
21.
FarsaniN. T., CoelhoC., & CostaC. (2011). Geotourism and geoparks as novel strategies for socio-economic development in rural areas. International Journal of Tourism Research, 13(1), 68–81.
22.
FryB. P., AgarwalaM., AtkinsonG., ClementsT., HomewoodK., MouratoS., RowcliffeJ. M., WallaceG., & Milber-GullandE. J. (2017). Monitoring local well-being in environmental interventions: A consideration of practical trade-offs. Oryx, 51(1), 68–76.
23.
GioiaD. A., CorleyK. G., & HamiltonA. L. (2012). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31.
24.
Global Geoparks Network. (2014). Guidelines and criteria for national geoparks seeking UNESCO’s assistance to join the global geoparks network (GGN). http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/SC/pdf/Geoparks_Guidelines_Jan2014.pdf
25.
GohH. C. (2021). Strategies for post-Covid-19 prospects of Sabah’s tourist market–Reactions to shocks caused by pandemic or reflection for sustainable tourism?Research in Globalization, 3 (2–4), 100056.
26.
GursoyD., JurowskiC., & UysalM. (2002). Resident attitudes: A structural modeling approach. Annals of Tourism Research, 29(1), 79–105.
27.
HalimS. A., & IshakN. A. (2017). Examining community engagement in heritage conservation through geopark experiences form the Asia Pacific region. Kajian Malaysia, 35(Supp.1), 11–38.
28.
HalimS. A., KomooI., SallehH., & OmarM. (2011). The geopark as a potential tool for alleviating community marginality. Shima: The International Journal of Research into Island Cultures, 5(1), 94–113.
29.
IbrahimM. S. N., HalimS. A., & IshakM. Y. (2019). The impacts of tourism development on community well-being in Langkawi: The case of Kampung Padang Puteh, Mukim Kedawang. Journal of Marine and Island Cultures, 8(2), 61–88.
30.
JoffeH. (2012). Chapter 15: Thematic analysis in qualitative research methods in mental health and psychotherapy. InHarperD. & ThompsonA.(Eds.), A guide for students and practitioners (pp. 209–223). Wiley-Blackwell.
31.
KohE., FakfareP., & PongwatA. (2020). The limits of Thai hospitality–perceived impact of tourism development on residents’ well-being in Chiang Mai. International Journal of Tourism Cities, 8(1), 187–209.
32.
LeeJ. S., & KimT. (2015). Searching for meaning of community well-being. InLeeS., KimY., & PhillipsR.(Eds.), Community well-being and community development (pp. 9–23). Springer.
33.
LeeT. H. (2013). Influence analysis of community resident support for sustainable tourism development. Tourism Management, 34, 37–46.
34.
MilesM. B., & HubermanA. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
35.
MyersM. D. (2019). Qualitative research in business and management. SAGE Publications.
36.
MySabah.com. (2020). Sabah Tourism Statistics. https://mysabah.com/sabah-tourism-statistics/#:∼:text=Total%20number%20of%20tourist%20arrivals%20in%20year%202020%3A%20977%2C460
37.
NunkooR., & SoK. K. F. (2016). Residents’ support for tourism: Testing alternative structural models. Journal of Travel Research, 55(7), 847–861.
38.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Designing qualitative studies. Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
39.
RavallionM. (2003). The debate on globalization, poverty and inequality: Why measurement matters. International Affairs, 79(4), 739–753.
40.
Sabah Tourism Board. (2019). General information – About us. https://www.sabahtourism.com/about-us/?locale=en.
41.
Sabah Tourism Board. (2021). Places to go: West coast division. https://www.sabahtourism.com/division/west-coast/
42.
SirgyM. J., RahtzD. R., CicicM., & UnderwoodR. (2000). A method for assessing residents’ satisfaction with community-based service: A quality-of-life perspective. Social Indicators Research, 49, 279–316.
43.
SungH. (2016). The influence and role of arts on community well-being. (Doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University).
44.
SungH. K., & PhillipsR. G. (2018). Indicators and community well-being: Exploring a relational framework. International Journal of Community Well-being, 1(1), 63–79.
45.
Sustainability Definition. (2021). The 3 Ps of sustainability. https://sustainabilitydefinition.org/the-3-ps-of-sustainability/#:∼:text=
46.
The Borneo Post. (2018). Geo tourism another new product in Sabah. https://www.pressreader.com/malaysia/the-borneo-post-sabah/20181006/281608126380379
47.
The Star. (2019). Tourism contributes RM42bil to economy. https://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2019/08/24/tourism-contributes-rm42bil-to-economy
48.
TononG. (2017). Community well-being and national well-being: The opinion of young people. InPhillipsR. & WongC.(Eds.), Handbook of community well-being research (pp. 523–530). Springer.
49.
Utusan Borneo Online. (2019). Jumlah pendaki Gunung Kinabalu meningkat sebanyak tujuh peratus. https://www.utusanborneo.com.my/2019/08/18/jumlah-pendaki-gunung-kinabalu-meningkat-sebanyak-tujuh-peratus
50.
VeenhovenR. (2006). How do we assess how happy we are? Tenets, implications and tenability of three theories. First draft paper presented at conference on ‘New Directions in the Study of Happiness: United States and International Perspectives’, University of Notre Dame, USA, October 22–24.
51.
VoigtC., & PforrC. (2013). Wellness tourism: A destination perspective. Routledge.
52.
WirutomoP., SudjatmikoI. G., SedaF. S. S. E., SetyawatiL., SuleemanE., YasmineD. I., PeraY. H. T., & GunawanF. F. (2018). The social well-being survey in Indonesia. The Senshu Social Well-being Review, 5, 117–135.
53.
ZourosN., & MartiniG. (2003). Introduction to the European geoparks network. Proceedings of the 2nd European Geoparks Network Meeting. Lesvos3–7 October 2001, 17–21.
