We examine the cost of leaders changing between empowering and directive leadership styles on team outcomes. In a laboratory experiment, we collected data from 240 participants in 80 teams. Confederates enacted different leadership styles and led teams of participants in performing a series of tasks. When leaders changed their style from directive to empowering, teams took time to respond in terms of higher satisfaction with leader and affective commitment. However, when leaders changed their style from empowering to directive, the deterioration of satisfaction with leader and reduction in affective commitment were immediate. Moreover, teams of leaders who had been consistently directive showed higher affective commitment as compared to teams of leaders who had a history of being empowering but later shifted to being directive. First time managers can get inputs on how they should enact their leadership style and be aware that switching between styles may impose long-term costs on the team’s affective commitment and satisfaction with the leader.
AlbrechtS. L., & AndreettaM. (2011). The influence of empowering leadership, empowerment and engagement on affective commitment and turnover intentions in community health service workers: Test of a model. Leadership in Health Services, 24(3), 228–237. https://doi.org/10.1108/17511871111151126
2.
AllenN. J., & MeyerJ. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x
3.
AlmutawaZ., MuenjohnN., & ZhangJ. (2016). The effect of human resource management system on employees’ commitment: The mediating role of the Amo Model. The Journal of Developing Areas, 50(6), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2016.0147
4.
AndersonC., JohnO. P., & KeltnerD. (2012). The personal sense of power. Journal of Personality, 80(2), 313–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00734.x
5.
AntonakisJ., SchriesheimC. A., DonovanJ., Kishore GopalakrishnaP., PellegriniE. K., & RossommeJ. L. (2011). Methods for studying leadership. In J. Antonakis & D. V. Day (Eds.), The nature of leadership (pp. 48–70). http://www.hec.unil.ch/jantonakis/AntonakisChapter03_5013.pdf
6.
ArnoldJ., AradS., RhoadesJ. A., & DrasgowF. (2000). The empowering leadership questionnaire: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors. Journal of Organisatiional Behaviour, 21, 249–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200005)21
7.
BarghJ. A., & PietromonacoP. (1982). Automatic information processing and social perception: The influence of trait information presented outside of conscious awareness on impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(3), 437–449.
8.
BarstowC. (2008). The power differential and the power paradox: Avoiding the pitfalls. Hakomi Forum, 19-20-21, 53–62.
9.
BebbingtonK., MacLeodC., Mark EllisonT., & FayN. (2017). The sky is falling: Evidence of a negativity bias in the social transmission of information. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(1), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.07.004
10.
BlanchardK. H., ZigarmiD., & NelsonR. B. (1993). Situational leadership after 25 years: A retrospective. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 1(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179199300100104
BoselieP. (2010). High performance work practices in the health care sector: A Dutch case study. International Journal of Manpower, 31(1), 42–58. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437721011031685
13.
CarneyD. R., ColvinR. C., & HallJ. A. (2007). A thin slice perspective on the accuracy of first impressions. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 1054–1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.01.004
14.
ChenG., SharmaP., EdingerS., ShapiroD. L., & FarhJ.-L. (2011). Motivating and demotivating forces in teams: Cross-level influences of empowering leadership and relationship conflict. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 541–557. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021886
15.
CialdiniR. B. (2001). Influence—Science and practice (4th ed. C. Merrill et al.). Allyn & Bacon A Pearson Education Company.
16.
CornsJ. (2018). Rethinking the negativity bias. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 9(3), 607–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-018-0382-7
17.
DolatabadiH. R., & SafaM. (2011). The effect of directive and participative leadership style on employees’ commitment to service quality. Journal of Business and Management, 4(2), 31–42.
18.
FiedlerF. E. (1971). Validation and extension of the contingency model of leadership effectiveness: A review of empirical findings. Psychological Bulletin, 76(2), 128–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031454
19.
FongK. H., & SnapeE. (2015). Empowering leadership, psychological empowerment and employee outcomes: Testing a multi-level mediating model. British Journal of Management, 26, 126–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12048
20.
GaoL., JanssenO., & ShiK. (2011). Leader trust and employee voice: The moderating role of empowering leader behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 22(4), 787–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.05.015
21.
GawronskiB., EhrenbergK., BanseR., ZukovaJ., & KlauerK. C. (2003). It’s in the mind of the beholder: The impact of stereotypic associations on category-based and individuating impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00517-6
22.
GiessnerS. R., van KnippenbergD., van GinkelW., & SleebosE. (2013). Team-oriented leadership: The interactive effects of leader group prototypicality, accountability, and team identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(4), 658–667. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032445
23.
HerseyP., BlanchardK. H., & NatemeyerW. E. (1979). Situational leadership, perception, and the impact of power. Group & Organization Management, 4(4), 418–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/105960117900400404
24.
HughesJ. H. J. (2007). The ability-motivation-opportunity framework for behavior research in IS. In 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’07), pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2007.518
25.
HumborstadS. I. W., & GiessnerS. R. (2018). The thin line between empowering and Laissez-Faire leadership: An expectancy-match perspective. Journal of Management, 44(2), 757–783. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315574597
26.
ItoT. A., & CacioppoJ. T. (2005). Variations on a human universal: Individual differences in positivity offset and negativity bias. Cognition and Emotion, 19(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930441000120
27.
ItoT. A., LarsenJ. T., SmithN. K., & CacioppoJ. T. (1998). Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorisation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(4), 887–900.
28.
KahaiS., SosikJ., & AvolioB. (1997). Effects of leadership style and problem structure on work group process and outcomes in an electronic meeting system environment. Personnel Psychology, 50(1), 121–146.
KimM., & BeehrT. A. (2018). Empowering leadership: Leading people to be present through affective organizational commitment?International Journal of Human Resource Management. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1424017
31.
LeeJ. (2005). Effects of leadership and leader-member exchange on commitment. Leadership and Organisation Development Journal, 26(8), 655–672. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940810894747
32.
LeeJ., LeeH., & ParkJ. (2014). Exploring the impact of empowering leadership on knowledge sharing, absorptive capacity and team performance in IT service. Information Technology & People, 27(3), 336–386. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-10-2012-0115
33.
LorinkovaN. M., PearsallM. J., & SimsH. P. (2013). Examining the differential longitudinal performance of directive versus empowering leadership in teams. Academy of Management Journal, 56(2), 573–596.
34.
MartinS. L., LiaoH., & CampbellE. M. (2013). Directive versus empowering leadership: A field experiment comparing impacts on task proficiency and proactivity. Academy of Management Journal, 56(5), 1372–1395. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0113
35.
McgrawK. O. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 30–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.30
36.
McLeod, S.A. (2019, July 10). What does effect size tell you? Simply psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/effect-size.html
37.
NeubergS. L., & FiskeS. T. (1987). Motivational influences on impression formation: Outcome dependency, accuracy-driven attention, and individuating processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 431–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.431
38.
OffermannL. R., KennedyJ. K., & WirtzP. W. (1994). Implicit leadership theories: Content, structure and generalizability. Leadership Quarterly, 5(1), 43–58.
39.
O’TooleJ. (1995). Leading change: The argument for values-based leadership. Random House.
40.
RaubS., & RobertC. (2010). Differential effects of empowering leadership on in-role and extra-role employee behaviors: Exploring the role of psychological empowerment and power values. Human Relations, 63(11), 1743–1770. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726710365092
41.
RozinP., & RoyzmanE. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(4), 296–320.
42.
ShuW., & ChengC. (2012). How to improve consumer attitudes toward using credit cards online: An experimental study. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11, 335–351. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2012.01.003
43.
SimsH. P., FarajS., & YunS. (2009). When should a leader be directive or empowering? How to develop your own situational theory of leadership. Business Horizons, 52(2), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2008.10.002
44.
SkowronskiJ. J., & CarlstonD. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105(1), 131–142.
45.
SrivastavaA., BartolK. M., & LockeE. A. (2006). Empowering leadership in management teams: Effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1239–1251. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.23478718
46.
ThompsonG., & GlasøL. (2018). Situational leadership theory: A test from a leader-follower congruence approach. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 39(5), 574–591. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-01-2018-0050
47.
TuckeyM. R., BakkerA. B., & DollardM. F. (2012). Empowering leaders optimize working conditions for engagement: A multilevel study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025942
48.
VroomV. H., & YettonP. W. (1973). Leadership and decision making. University of Pittsburgh Pre. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412979351.n42
49.
WeirJ. (2005). Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 19(1), 231–240.
50.
XieS. Y., FlakeJ. K., & HehmanE. (2019). Perceiver and target characteristics contribute to impression formation differently across race and gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000160
51.
YuklG. (2012, November). Effective leadership behavior: What we know and what questions need more attention. Academy af Management Perspectives, 26(4), 66–85. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0088
52.
ZaccaroS. J. (2007). Trait-based perspectives of leadership. The American Psychologist, 62(1), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.62.1.6
53.
ZhangX., & BartolK. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process management. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2010.48037118
