Present study is an attempt to measure technology readiness of Indian customers towards self checkout service (SCS) through mobile app at retail stores at Hyderabad, India. Self-checkout services (SCS), a key offering of self service technology (SST), ‘is the technological enablement of customers to make payments and complete a checkout, after shopping, with little or no interaction with a service employee.’ Researchers also studied correlations between technology readiness, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and likelihood to use SCS. For the purpose of the study TRI 2.0 developed by Parasuraman and Colby (2015) was used along with items of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, adapted from Davis (1989), and items of ‘likelihood to use’ adapted from Bitner, Ostrom and Meuter (2002). The findings of the study reveal that respondents’ technology readiness was moderate with respect to mobile based SCS. Significant positive correlations were found between: technology readiness and perceived ease of use, perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and likelihood to use, perceived usefulness and likelihood to use. Further the respondents were categorised in to five technology segments as sceptics, explorers, pioneers, avoiders and hesitators.
AlparP. (1992). Automation of banking functions and its managerial implications. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 39(4), 378–385.
2.
AndresonJ. C.GerbingD. W. (1992). Assumptions and comparative strengths of the two step approach comment on Fornell and Yi. Sociological Methods and Research, 20(3), 321–333.
3.
AronA.AronE. (1999). Statistics for psychology (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4.
BitnerM. J.OstromA. L.MeuterM. L. (2002). Implementing successful self-service technologies. The Academy of Management Executive, 16(4), 96–108.
5.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods and Research, 21(2), 230–258.
6.
CarminesE. G.McIverJ. P. (1981). Analyzing models with unobserved variables. In BornstedtG. W.BorgattaE. F. (Eds.), Social measurement: Current issues (pp. 65–115). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications.
7.
CurranJ. M.MeuterM. L. (2005). Self-service technology adoption: Comparing three technologies. Journal of Services Marketing, 19(2), 103–113.
8.
DabholkarP. A. (1994). Incorporating choice into an attitudinal framework: Analyzing models of mental comparison processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 100–109.
9.
DabholkarP. A. (1996). Consumer evaluations of new technology-based self-service options: An investigation of alternative models of service quality. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(1), 29–51.
10.
DavisF. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
11.
ElliottK. M.HallM. C.MengJ. G. (2013). Consumers’ intention to use self-scanning technology: The role of technology readiness and perceptions toward self-service technology. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 17(1), 129.
12.
ElliottK. M.MengJ.HallM. C. (2008). Technology readiness and the likelihood to use self-service technology: Chinese vs. American consumers. Marketing Management Journal, 18(2), 20–31.
13.
FieldA. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed., Introducing Statistical Methods). London, UK: SAGE Publications.
14.
GustafssonA.EkdahlF.EdvardssonB. (1999). Customer focused service development in practice: A case study at Scandinavian airlines system (SAS). International Journal of Service Industry Management, 10(4), 344–358.
15.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E.TathamR. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Pearson Education.
16.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E.TathamR. L. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.
17.
HsiehC. T. (2005). Implementing self-service technology to gain competitive advantages. Communications of the IIMA, 5(1), 9.
18.
HungW.MichaelC. (2012). Determinants and consequences of consumer satisfaction with self-service technology in a retail setting. Managing Service Quality, 22(2), 128–144.
19.
India Brand Equity Foundation (IBEF). (2017). India at a glance. New Delhi: An Initiative of the Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India. Retrieved from https://www.ibef.org/download/Retail-January-2017.pdf
20.
KaiserH. (1974). An index of factor simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36.
21.
KallweitK.SpreerP.ToporowskiW. (2014). Why do customers use self-service information technologies in retail? The mediating effect of perceived service quality. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21(3), 268–276.
22.
KauffmanR. J.LallyL. (1994). A value platform analysis perspective on customer access information technology. Decision Sciences, 25(5–6), 767–794.
23.
KelleyM. R. (1994). Productivity and information technology: The elusive connection. Management Science, 40(11), 1406–1425.
24.
KellyP.LawlorJ.MulveyM. (2010). A review of key factors affecting consumers’ adoption and usage of self-service technologies in tourism. Paper presented at the THRIC Conference, Shannon, 15–16, June, Dublin Institute of Technology, Dublin, Ireland.
25.
KlemL. (2000). Structural equation modeling. In GrimmL. G.YarnoldP. P. (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 227–260). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
26.
KlineR. (2005). The principles and practices of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
27.
LeeH. J.FairhurstA. E.LeeM. Y. (2009). The importance of self-service kiosks in developing consumers’ retail patronage intentions. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 19(6), 687–701.
28.
LiljanderV.GillbergF.GummerusJ.Van RielA. (2006). Technology readiness and the evaluation and adoption of self-service technologies. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 13(3), 177–191.
29.
LinC. H.ShihH. Y.SherP. J. (2007). Integrating technology readiness into technology acceptance: The TRAM model. Psychology & Marketing, 24(7), 641–657.
30.
McDonaldR. P.HoM. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64–82.
31.
MeuterM. L.BitnerM. J. (1998). Self-service technologies: Extending service frameworks and identifying issues for research. In GrewalDhruvPechmannConnie (Eds.), AMA Winter Educator’s Conference Proceedings: Marketing Theory and Applications, Vol. 9 (pp. 12–19). Chicago: American Marketing Association.
32.
MeuterM. L.BitnerM. J.OstromA. L.BrownS. (2005). Choosing among alternative service delivery modes: An investigation of customer trial of self-service technologies. Journal of Marketing, 69(2), 61–83.
33.
MeuterM. L.OstromA. L.BitnerM. J.RoundtreeR. (2003). The influence of technology anxiety on consumer use and experiences with self-service technologies. Journal of Business Research, 56(11), 899–906.
34.
MickD. G.FournierS. (1998). Paradoxes of technology: Consumer cognizance, emotions, and coping strategies. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(2), 123–143.
35.
NunnallyJ. C. (1967). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
36.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
37.
NunnallyJ. C.BernsteinI. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
38.
OrelF. D.KaraA. (2014). Supermarket self-checkout service quality, customer satisfaction, and loyalty: Empirical evidence from an emerging market. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21(2), 118–129.
39.
ParasuramanA. (2000). Technology Readiness Index (TRI) a multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal of Service Research, 2(4), 307–320.
40.
ParasuramanA.ColbyC. L. (2001). Techno-ready marketing: How and why your customers adopt technology. New York, NY: Free Press.
41.
ParasuramanA.ColbyC. L. (2015). An updated and streamlined technology readiness index: TRI 2.0. Journal of Service Research, 18(1), 59–74.
42.
ParasuramanA.AssociatesRockbridge Inc. (2014). Rockbridge introduces Technology Readiness Index 2.0 in recent paper published in the Journal of Service Research. Retrieved from https://rockresearch.com/technology-readiness-index-journal-of-service-research/lable
43.
ParasuramanA.ZeithamlV. A.BerryL. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.
44.
ProencaJ. F.RodriguesM. A. (2011). A comparison of users and non-users of banking self-service technology in Portugal. Managing Service Quality, 21(2), 192–210.
45.
RamS. (1987). A model of innovation resistance. Advances in Consumer Research, 14(1), 208–212.
46.
RoehrichG. (2004). Consumer innovativeness: Concepts and measurements. Journal of Business Research, 57(6), 671–677.
47.
VuckovacD.FritzenP.FuchsK. L.IlicA. (2017). From Shopping Aids to Fully Autonomous Mobile Self-checkouts-A Field Study in Retail. In LeimeisterJ. M.BrennerW. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Business computer science (pp. 927–941), St. Gallen.
48.
WangW.HsiehP.ButlerJ. E.HsuS. H. (2008). Innovate with complex information technologies: A theoretical model and empirical examination. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 49(1), 27–36.
49.
ZeithamlV. A.GillyM. C. (1987). Characteristics affecting the acceptance of retailing technologies: A comparison of elderly and nonelderly consumers. Journal of Retailing, 63(1), 49–68.
50.
ZhaoX.MattilaA. S.TaoEvaL.S. (2008). The role of post-training self-efficacy in customers’ use of self-service technologies. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 19(4), 492–505.
