From an investor’s perspective, this study examines the impact of geopolitical risk (GPR) on stock returns in Vietnam, an emerging market characterized by high sensitivity to global shocks. Using monthly data for all listed companies between January 2010 and December 2023, we employ a panel fixed effects model as the primary specification to control for unobserved firm heterogeneity. The results reveal a statistically significant negative relationship between GPR and stock returns, indicating that geopolitical uncertainty erodes investor confidence and market performance. Consistent with the risk–return trade-off, firms more sensitive to GPR (higher GPR β) exhibit higher expected returns, reflecting investors’ demand for compensation for elevated risk. Robustness checks using pooled OLS confirm the stability of the findings. By focusing on an emerging market context, this study contributes novel evidence on how geopolitical shocks shape financial outcomes and highlights the importance of integrating GPR measures into risk assessment and investment strategies.
AgorakiM.-E. K., KouretasG. P., LaopodisN. T. J. E., & StudiesP. (2022). Geopolitical risks, uncertainty, and stock market performance. Economic and Political Studies, 10(3), 253–265.
2.
AmihudY., & NohJ. (2021). Illiquidity and stock returns II: Cross-section and time-series effects. The Review of Financial Studies, 34(4), 2101–2123.
3.
AysanA. F., DemirE., GozgorG., & LauC. K. M. (2019). Effects of the geopolitical risks on Bitcoin returns and volatility. Research in International Business and Finance, 47, 511–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2018.09.011
4.
BaurD. G., & SmalesL. A. (2020). Hedging geopolitical risk with precious metals. Journal of banking & Finance, 117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2020.105823
5.
BeckT., & LevineR. (2004). Stock markets, banks, and growth: Panel evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 28(3), 423–442.
6.
BekaertG., HarveyC. R., & LundbladC. J. (2007). Liquidity and expected returns: Lessons from emerging markets. Review of Financial Studies, 20(6), 1783–1831. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhm030
7.
BenkraiemR., GoutteS., SaadiS., ZhuH., & ZhuS. (2022). Investor heterogeneity and negative skewness in stock returns: Evidence from institutional investors. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 81, 101690.
8.
BhowmikR., & WangS. (2020). Stock market volatility and return analysis: A systematic literature review. Entropy, 22(5), 522.
9.
BouoiyourJ., SelmiR., HammoudehS., & WoharM. E. (2019). What are the categories of geopolitical risks that could drive oil prices higher? Acts or threats?Energy Economics, 84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104523
ChenZ., DaZ., HuangD., & WangL. (2023). Presidential economic approval rating and the cross-section of stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 147(1), 106–131.
12.
ChoiS.-Y. (2022). Evidence from a multiple and partial wavelet analysis on the impact of geopolitical concerns on stock markets in North-East Asian countries. Finance Research Letters, 46, 102465. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102465
13.
ColonF., KimC., KimH., & KimW. (2021). The effect of political and economic uncertainty on the cryptocurrency market. Finance Research Letters, 39, 101621.
14.
FiorilloP., MelesA., PellegrinoL. R., & VerdolivaV. (2024). Geopolitical risk and stock price crash risk: The mitigating role of ESG performance. International Review of Financial Analysis, 91, 102958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.102958
15.
HuttonA. P., MarcusA. J., & TehranianH. (2009). Opaque financial reports, R2, and crash risk. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(1), 67–86.
16.
HuynhT. T., & KhoaB. T. (2025a). Determinants of Vietnam’s VN-Index: Analyzing the interplay of global and domestic factors using machine learning. In YaseenS. G. (Ed.), Applied artificial intelligence in business: Systems, tools and techniques (pp. 15–29). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-90271-0_2
17.
HuynhT. T., & KhoaB. T. (2025b). Regional asymmetry in financial markets: Pricing of skewness risk in the Thai stock market. PLoS One, 20(11), e0336697. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0336697
18.
JiaS., YangL., & ZhouF. (2022). Geopolitical risk and corporate innovation: Evidence from China. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 66, 100772.
19.
JiaoJ.-W., YinJ.-P., XuP.-F., ZhangJ., & LiuY. (2023). Transmission mechanisms of geopolitical risks to the crude oil market: A pioneering two-stage geopolitical risk analysis approach. Energy, 283, 128449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.128449
20.
KhoaB. T., & HuynhT. T. (2021). Is it possible to earn abnormal return in an inefficient market? An approach based on machine learning in stock trading. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2021, 2917577. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2917577
PhanD. H. B., & NarayanP. K. (2021). Country responses and the reaction of the stock market to COVID-19: A preliminary exposition. In AgorakiM. K., KouretasG. P., & LaopodisN. T. (Eds.), Research on pandemics (pp. 6–18). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003208858-2
23.
PhanD. H. B., TranV. T., & IykeB. N. (2022). Geopolitical risk and bank stability. Finance Research Letters, 46, 102453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102453
24.
Santa‐ClaraP., & ValkanovR. (2003). The presidential puzzle: Political cycles and the stock market. The Journal of Finance, 58(5), 1841–1872.
25.
VoD. H., TranM. P.-B., & CaoP. T.-H. (2024). Return spillover of Vietnam’s sectors in response to US uncertainties. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 10(3), e25143.
26.
VoX. V. (2016). Foreign ownership and stock market liquidity-evidence from Vietnam. Afro-Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting, 6(1), 1–11.
27.
ZhangY., HeJ., HeM., & LiS. (2023). Geopolitical risk and stock market volatility: A global perspective. Finance Research Letters, 53, 103620.
28.
ZhangY., ZhangY., RenX., & JinM. (2024). Geopolitical risk exposure and stock returns: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 64, 105479.
