The article examines the corruption–growth relationship in a non-linear framework using panel fixed effects (FE) and system generalized methods of moments (SGMM) model for over 110 countries for the period 1984–2009. The results reveal that the least corrupt countries enjoy higher growth rates, whereas highly corrupt countries experience low growth. Furthermore, corruption has a positive and significant effect on economic growth up to a certain level and thereafter it reduces growth. The results are robust under various methodology and an alternative measure of corruption.
AcemogluD.NaiduS.RestrepoP. & RobinsonJ. A. (2015). Chapter 21—Democracy, redistribution and inequality. In AnthonyAtkinson B. & François Bourguignon (Eds), Handbook of Income Distribution (Vol. 2, pp. 1885–1966). Elsevier.
2.
AcemogluD. & VerdierT. (1998). Property rights, corruption and the allocation of talent: A general equilibrium approach. Economic Journal, 108(450), 1381–1403.
3.
AidtT.DuttaJ. & SenaV. (2008). Governance regimes, corruption and growth: Theory and evidence. Journal of Comparative Economics, 36(2), 195–220.
4.
ArellanoC.BulirA.LaneT. & LipschitzL. (2009). The dynamic implications of foreign aid and its variability. Journal of Development Economics, 88(1), 87–102.
5.
ArellanoM. & BondS. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and its application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297.
6.
BardhanP. (1997). Corruption and development: A review of issues. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(3), 1320–1346.
7.
BaumC. F.SchafferM. E. & StillmanS. (2003). Instrumental variables and GMM: Estimation and testing. The Stata Journal, 3(1), 1–31.
8.
BlundellR. & BondS. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143.
9.
BondS. R.HoefflerA. & TempleJ. (2001). GMM estimation of empirical growth models (CEPR Discussion Paper No. 3048). London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
10.
BrunettiA.KisunkoG. & WederB. (1998). Credibility of rules and economic growth: Evidence from a worldwide survey of the private sector. The World Bank Economic Review, 12(3), 353–384.
11.
ChervinM. & SwederS. V. (2010). Economic growth and the volatility of foreign aid (Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper No. 10-002/2). Amsterdam: Tinbergen Institute.
12.
GuptaS.MelloL. D. & SharanR. (2001). Corruption and military spending. European Journal of Political Economy, 17(4), 749–777.
13.
HuntingtonS. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
14.
KaufmanD. & WeiS.-J. (1999). Does ‘grease money’ speed up the wheels of commerce? (NBER Working Paper No. 7093). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
15.
KlitgaardR. (1988). Controlling corruption. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
16.
KnackS. & KeeferP. (1995). Institutions and economic performance: Cross-country tests using alternative institutional measures. Economics & Politics, 7(3), 207–227.
17.
LeffN. (1964). Economic development through bureaucratic corruption. American Behavioural Scientist, 8(3), 8–14.
18.
MauroP. (1995). Corruption and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 681–712.
19.
MauroP. (1997). Why worry about corruption? (IMF Economic Issue Report No. 6). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
20.
MauroP. (1998). Corruption and the composition of government expenditure. Journal of Public Economics, 69(2), 263–279.
21.
MendezF. & SepulvedaF. (2006). Corruption, growth and political regimes: Cross country evidence. European Journal of Political Economy, 22(1), 82–98.
22.
MéonP. & SekkatK. (2005). Does corruption grease or sand the wheels of growth?Public Choice, 122(1–2), 69–97.
23.
MéonP.-G. & WeillL. (2008). Is corruption an efficient grease? (BOFIT Discussion Paper No. 20/2008). Finland: The Bank of Finland, Institute for Economies.
24.
MoP. H. (2001). Corruption and economic growth. Journal of Comparative Economics, 29(1), 66–79.
25.
MurphyK. M.ShleiferA. & VishnyR. W. (1991). The allocation of talent: Implications for growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 503–530.
26.
MyrdalG. (1968). Asian drama: An inquiry into the poverty of nations. New York, NY: Twentieth Century Fund.
27.
PelligriniL. & GerlaghR. (2004). Corruption’s effect on growth and its transmission channels. Kyklos, 57(3), 429–456.
28.
RajanR. G. & SubramanianA. (2008). Aid and growth: What does the cross-country evidence really show?The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(4), 643–665.
29.
RockM. T. & BonnettH. (2004). The comparative politics of corruption: Accounting for the East Asian paradox in empirical studies of corruption, growth and investment. World Development, 36(2), 999–1017.
30.
Rose-AckermanS. (1978). Corruption: A study in political economy. New York, NY: Academic Press.
31.
ShleiferA. & VishnyR. W. (1993). Corruption. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 599–617.
32.
SvenssonJ. (2005). Eight questions about corruption. Journal of Economics Perspectives, 19(3), 19–42.
33.
SwaleheenM. (2011). Economic growth with endogenous corruption: An empirical study. Public Choice, 146(1–2), 23–41.
34.
TanziV. (1998). Corruption around the world: Causes, consequences, scope, and cures. International Monetary Fund Staff Papers, 45(4), 559–594.
